Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Gastrointestinal Tumor Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common disease among the population in Taiwan, with gastrointestinal tumor bleeding accounting for 3-5% of cases. The pathophysiology of gastrointestinal tumor bleeding is unique, involving fragile surface mucosa, abnormal vascular proliferation, and malformation, making endoscopic hemostasis challenging. Conventional endoscopic hemostasis methods such as hemostatic injections, clips, or thermal coagulation have suboptimal success rates below 80%, with recurrence rates exceeding 50%. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that hemostatic powder spraying effectively enhances hemostasis for gastrointestinal ulcers and reduces recurrence rates. Our previous research repurposed tranexamic acid in a powder form to enhance hemostasis for peptic ulcer and applied sucralfate powder to prevent postpolypectomy wound bleeding. Study aim Our research team combines previous experience by using tranexamic acid and sucralfate drug powders to spray onto bleeding gastrointestinal tumors to achieve hemostatic effects. Additionally, tumor-derived exosomes are associated with tumor angiogenesis and growth, so we hypothesize that gastrointestinal tumor bleeding may be linked to VEGF and miR-21 expression within gastrointestinal tumor exosomes. Study method This study is a clinical randomized controlled trial conducted at National Cheng Kung University Hospital. We will recruit 60 patients with gastrointestinal tumor bleeding undergoing endoscopic hemostasis. Patients in the experimental treatment group will receive additional topical administration of 1.5 g of tranexamic acid and 3 g of sucralfate drug powder. Immediate hemostasis and 30-day bleeding recurrence will be observed. Enrolled patients will also provide blood and tumor specimens for exosome analysis, evaluating the predictive effect of extracted tumor exosomes' VEGF and miR-21 on bleeding risk. This study will explore the association between specific tumor exosome expression levels and bleeding, serving as a basis for bleeding risk assessment and innovative therapies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
April 20, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.7 years
April 13, 2026
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
30-day rebleeding
Rebleeding was defined by any of the following criteria: (1) hematemesis or bloody nasogastric tube drainage occurring more than 6 hours after endoscopy; (2) melena recurring after initial normalization of stool color; (3) hematochezia occurring after normalization of stool color or melena; (4) development of tachycardia (heart rate ≥110 beats/min) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg) after at least 1 hour of stable vital signs without other identifiable cause; (5) a hemoglobin drop of ≥2 g/dL following two consecutive stable hemoglobin measurements; (6) tachycardia or hypotension persisting beyond 8 hours after the index endoscopy despite appropriate resuscitation, without alternative explanation, accompanied by ongoing melena or hematochezia; or (7) a persistent hemoglobin decline of \>3 g/dL within 24 hours together with ongoing melena or hematochezia.
30 days
immediate hemostasis
no evidence of further bleeding after 3 minutes of observation during the index endoscopy, with elapsed time measured by a stopwatch.
3 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
rebleeding in need of TAE or surgery
30 days
all cause mortality
30 days
hospitalization day
30 days
Study Arms (2)
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALFor patients in both the standard group and intervention group, epinephrine injection, clipping, and heat coagulation will be applied. The decision for the choice of standard therapy was left to the discretion of the endoscopist in the absence of any recommendations or proof of superiority of one modality over another in the initial endoscopic approach to use in patients presenting with malignant bleeding. For patients in the intervention group, we will additionally deliver 3g of sucralfate powder and 1.5g of tranexamic acid powder through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site after conventional therapy.
Standard group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients in both the standard group and intervention group, epinephrine injection, clipping, and heat coagulation will be applied. The decision for the choice of standard therapy was left to the discretion of the endoscopist in the absence of any recommendations or proof of superiority of one modality over another in the initial endoscopic approach to use in patients presenting with malignant bleeding.
Interventions
For patients in the intervention group, we will additionally deliver 3g of sucralfate powder and 1.5g of tranexamic acid powder through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site after conventional therapy. After endoscopic treatment, 5 minutes of observation time is needed for the immediate hemostasis confirmation. After endoscopic hemostasis, patients with upper gastrointestinal lesions received an intravenous 80-mg bolus of proton pump inhibitors followed by 8 mg/h continuously for at least 72 hours.
Epinephrine injection, clipping, and heat coagulation will be applied. The decision for the choice of standard therapy was left to the discretion of the endoscopist in the absence of any recommendations or proof of superiority of one modality over another in the initial endoscopic approach to use in patients presenting with malignant bleeding.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged ≥ 18 years who accept endoscopy for upper GI tumor bleeding
You may not qualify if:
- patients with no need for endoscopic hemostasis, allergy to sucralfate, tranexamic acid, pregnancy, and patients with hollow organ perforation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, Not Required For This Country, 704, Taiwan
Related Publications (6)
Chiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Kuo TL, Hsieh MT, Kang JW, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Lin MY, Hong TC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Lu MH, Wu MH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Clinical Trial: Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;16(4):e00818. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000818.
PMID: 39836033RESULTChiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Hsieh MT, Shih IC, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Kuo HY, Tsai WC, Lo YN, Yang KC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Tseng HH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Precise application of topical tranexamic acid to enhance endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized controlled study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Nov;98(5):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
PMID: 37356632RESULTCeci C, Atzori MG, Lacal PM, Graziani G. Role of VEGFs/VEGFR-1 Signaling and its Inhibition in Modulating Tumor Invasion: Experimental Evidence in Different Metastatic Cancer Models. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 18;21(4):1388. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041388.
PMID: 32085654RESULTFu M, Gu J, Jiang P, Qian H, Xu W, Zhang X. Exosomes in gastric cancer: roles, mechanisms, and applications. Mol Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1001-7.
PMID: 30876419RESULTWang M, Shu H, Cheng X, Xiao H, Jin Z, Yao N, Mao S, Zong Z. Exosome as a crucial communicator between tumor microenvironment and gastric cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 2024 Mar;64(3):28. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5616. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
PMID: 38240092RESULTZheng Z, Zhai Y, Yan X, Wang Z, Zhang H, Xu R, Liu X, Cai J, Zhang Z, Shang Y, Zhang J, Yin J. Functions and Clinical Applications of Exosomes in Gastric Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2025 Feb 28;21(5):2330-2345. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.98087. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40083701RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2026
First Posted
April 20, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After paper accept
- Access Criteria
- Email PI for information
After paper accept