Subanesthetic Esketamine in Modified ECT for Severe Depression in Adolescents: Clinical and Mechanistic Study
Clinical and Mechanistic Study of Subanesthetic-dose Esketamine in Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy for Adolescents With Severe Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study design was a randomized, double blind, parallel controlled trial.The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if esketamine-assisted modified electroconvulsive therapy (ESK-MECT) works to treat severe depression in adolescents. It will also learn about the safety of ESK-MECT. The sample size was calculated based on the response rate of patients with depression undergoing electroconvulsive therapy(ECT).According to the results of the pilot study,the efficacy rate of subjects receiving adjunctive esketamine was approximately 78%,while the efficacy rate of those receiving only propofol was 63%.The expected superiority difference in remission rates between the two groups was 15%(one-sided)for the power calculation.Assuming a significance level of α=0.05 and a test power of β=0.2,with a 1:1 ratio of sample sizes between the two groups,the total sample size was calculated to be 198 using the PASS software(PASS 2023).Considering a dropout rate of 10%,a total of 220 subjects were required,with 110 subjects in each group.
- 1.experimental group The patients were given intravenous injection of 0.25 mg / kg esketamine, 1.5 mg / kg propofol and 1 mg / kg succinylcholine in turn. After anesthesia, the patients were given electroconvulsive therapy.
- 2.In the control group The patients were given normal saline consistent with esketamine injection volume, 1.5mg/kg of propofol and 1mg / kg of succinylcholine. After anesthesia, the patients were given electroconvulsive therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2026
January 7, 2026
November 1, 2025
12 months
September 24, 2025
January 6, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment response rate
Response is defined as two consecutive HAMD-24 scores ≤ 50% before treatment after receiving MECT treatment. The response rate is calculated as the number of patients who achieved as response divided by the total number of patients receiving MECT.In this study, the 24-item version of HAMD was utilized.
immediately after the end of each MECT procedure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Remission rate of depressive symptoms after MECT treatment
immediately after the end of each MECT procedure
Changes in cognitive function
Immediately after the end of MECT course
The remission rate of suicidal ideation
through treatment completion, an average of 18 days
Changes in psychiatric symptoms
Immediately after the end of MECT course
Wechsler Memory Scale-Chinese-Revision
Immediately after the end of MECT course
Study Arms (2)
Esketamine injection group (0.25mg/kg)
EXPERIMENTALThe main anesthesiologist standing on the right side of the patient gave successive injections of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg), and 1 minute later, injected propofol (1.5mg/kg) for 30 s.After the loss of consciousness, all patients were administered 1 mg/kg of succinylcholine chloride and manually ventilated with a face mask until they regained full consciousness.
Saline injection group(Consistent with esketamine injection volume)
SHAM COMPARATORThe main anesthesiologist standing on the right side of the patient gave successive injections of saline (Consistent with esketamine injection volume), and 1 minute later, injected 1.5mg/kg of propofol in 30s.After the loss of consciousness,all patients were administered 1 mg/kg of succinylcholine chloride and manually ventilated with a face mask until they regained full consciousness.
Interventions
The main anesthesiologist standing on the right side of the patient injects esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) sequentially, and then propofol (1.5 mg/kg) is injected 1 minute later for 30 s.After the loss of consciousness,all patients were administered 1 mg/kg of succinylcholine chloride and manually ventilated with a face mask until they regained full consciousness.
The main anesthesiologist standing on the right side of the patient injects saline (Consistent with esketamine injection volume) sequentially, and then propofol (1.5 mg/kg) is injected 1 minute later, the injection time is 30s.After the loss of consciousness,all patients were administered 1 mg/kg of succinylcholine chloride and manually ventilated with a face mask until they regained full consciousness.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Inpatients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder according to the International Classification of Diseases,11th Revision(ICD-11),and scheduled for Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy(MECT);
- Aged 13 to 17 years,regardless of gender;
- Educational attainment of primary school or higher;
- Normal hearing and vision,including color perception;
- Voluntary participation in the study with signed informed consent;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)physical status classification I-II.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cardiovascular disease,significant arrhythmias,or other cardiac conditions;
- Inability to complete the assessment scales;
- History of substance abuse;
- Received electroconvulsive therapy(ECT)within 6 months prior to the study;
- Severe cerebrovascular disease,severe hypertension,intracranial hypertension,or presence of intracranial electrodes;
- Severe allergy or contraindication to propofol or succinylcholine;
- Comorbid with other psychiatric disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Min Sulead
Study Sites (2)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Su Min
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
November 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 20, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 20, 2026
Last Updated
January 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data(IPD)is detailed information collected from each study participant.There are several reasons why IPD might not be shared: * Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns * Personal Identifiable Information:IPD contains sensitive information like medical history and genetic data.Sharing it without safeguards can violate privacy and lead to issues like discrimination. * Regulatory Requirements:Laws like GDPR require strict handling of personal data.Sharing IPD without proper anonymization and consent can result in legal problems. * Intellectual Property and Commercial Interests * Research Investment:Generating IPD requires significant resources.Researchers may want to control the data to fully exploit it for further research and publications. * Patent and Licensing Issues:Premature sharing of IPD can affect patentability and licensing agreements. * Data Integrity and Misuse * Quality Control:Shared IPD can be misinterpreted by others who lack context,leading