Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer, SOS5C Trial
Minimally Invasive Molecular Approaches for the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma- R01 Aim 1a Renewal (SOS5C Trial)
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,010
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies how well minimally invasive approaches (an artificial intelligence \[AI\] powered risk tool, nurse navigation, and a sponge on a string \[SOS\] test) work in diagnosing patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer. Esophageal cancer has a poor 5-year survival rate when diagnosed after onset of symptoms. While rising, incidence of esophageal cancer remains too low to screen the entire population. BE is a condition in which the cells lining the lower part of the esophagus have changed or been replaced with abnormal cells that could lead to esophageal cancer. Currently, patients are screened for BE based on certain risk factors (reflux, age \> 50 years, White race, family history of esophageal cancer, obesity, male sex, and smoking), followed by endoscopies and surgery for treatment. These standard procedures may result in under-recognition of BE risk due to inaccurate and difficult to use risk assessment tools, high cost, invasiveness, low access to endoscopy, and sub-optimal recognition of abnormal cells during routing endoscopy. An AI powered risk tool that integrates symptoms, health history, and laboratory values from electronic health record data may more accurately assess BE and esophageal cancer risk that manual assessment. The BE-SOS screening test combines a swallowable cell collection device with assessment of DNA, which may more accurately diagnose abnormal cells. Nurse navigation involves trained personnel assisting individuals through the screening process and completing the follow-up diagnostic test if the screening test is positive. Navigators address cultural, social, access, and logistical barriers to screening. Nurse navigation may increase completion rates of diagnostic procedures following a positive screening test. These minimally invasive approaches may enable higher rates of BE screening than currently being accomplished.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2030
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2030
April 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
4.2 years
September 26, 2025
April 15, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of completed Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening
Assessed as the proportion of patients who complete BE screening. This is determined as the number of patients who complete a sponge on a string (SOS) BE screening test or endoscopy screen, divided by the number of screen eligible patients in each group.
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Negative predictive value of the AI powered BE Risk Tool (Aim 1b)
A randomly selected sample of patients (N=50) with a negative BE risk tool score will undergo a research upper endoscopy to confirm the high estimated negative predicted value of the BE risk tool.
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
BE screening ordered (completed + not completed)
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Successful completion of the SOS BE screen test
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Completion of diagnostic endoscopy following a positive SOS BE screen test
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Rates of BE [with or without dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)]
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Patients flagged for screening by the BE risk tool in the intervention clusters who also meet American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) BE screening guidelines
Baseline (completion of endoscopy)
Study Arms (6)
Arm 1 (T1 SOC, T2-T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster A provide SOC procedures during T1 consisting of the following: 1) Care teams manually assess BE risk for patients, and patients meeting ACG criteria are recommended to undergo BE screening with BE-SOS test followed by endoscopy (only if BE-SOS positive). Family Medicine Care Teams in Cluster A then provide intervention procedures during T2, T3, and T4 consisting of the following: 1) Care teams utilize RN navigators that assist in using the AI powered BE Risk Tool to assess patients' BE risk; 2) Patients with AI powered BE Risk Tool high risk result undergo BE-SOS test with RN navigator assistance; 3) Patients with positive BE-SOS test results then undergo endoscopy with RN navigator facilitation.
Arm 2 (T1 SOC, T2-T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster B provide SOC procedures as in Arm 1 during T1, followed by intervention procedures as in Arm 1 during T2, T3, and T4.
Arm 3 (T1-T2 SOC, T3-T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster C provide SOC procedures as in Arm 1 during T1 and T2, followed by intervention procedures as in Arm 1 during T3 and T4.
Arm 4 (T1-T2 SOC, T3-T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster D provide SOC procedures as in Arm 1 during T1 and T2, followed by intervention procedures as in Arm 1 during T3 and T4.
Arm 5 (T1-T3 SOC, T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster E provide SOC procedures as in Arm 1 during T1, T2, and T3, followed by intervention procedures as in Arm 1 during T4.
Arm 6 (T1-T3 SOC, T4 Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALFamily Medicine Care Teams in Cluster F provide SOC procedures as in Arm 1 during T1, T2, and T3, followed by intervention procedures as in Arm 1 during T4.
Interventions
Undergo BE-SOS test
Undergo BE risk assessment using AI powered BE Risk Tool
Undergo endoscopy
Undergo manual BE risk assessment
Receive RN navigation
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Adult patients 18-85 years old
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A INTERVENTION CLUSTERS: BE Risk Tool Score \> 0.087, indicating a higher risk for BE/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This will be run as a web-based application integrating data from several domains in the electronic health record (EPIC). Output score will range from 0-1.
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A CONTROL CLUSTERS: Meeting American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) screening criteria (gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\]+ \> 2 BE risk factors: Age ≥ 50 years, Male sex, Caucasian race, obesity \[body mass index (BMI) \> 30\], ever smoker, family history of BE/EAC)
- SPECIFIC AIM 1B: A "low risk" BE risk tool score (\< 0.0897)
You may not qualify if:
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: History of Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Prior endoscopy in the last 10 years
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients who are unable to consent
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with a current history of uninvestigated dysphagia
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: History of eosinophilic esophagitis, achalasia
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients on oral anticoagulation including Coumadin, Warfarin unless discontinued for five days prior to the sponge procedure
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients on antiplatelet agents including Clopidogrel, unless discontinued for five days prior to the sponge procedure
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients on oral thrombin inhibitors including Dabigatran and oral factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, unless discontinued for five days prior to the sponge procedure
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with a history of known varices or cirrhosis
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with a history of esophageal or gastric resection for esophageal or gastric carcinoma
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with congenital or acquired bleeding diatheses
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with a history of esophageal squamous dysplasia or esophageal squamous carcinoma
- SPECIFIC AIM 1A: Patients with limited life expectancy (\< 2 years): per provider judgement
- SPECIFIC AIM 1B: History of Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma
- SPECIFIC AIM 1B: Prior endoscopy in the last 10 years
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54701, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prasad G Iyer, MD, MS
Mayo Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2025
First Posted
October 3, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2030
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04