NCT07102121

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare post-cementation sensitivity between resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) as luting materials. Conducted at the Prosthodontics Department, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat, the study will enroll 248 patients aged 15-70 with vital abutment teeth, randomly assigned to receive either RMGIC or GIC. Sensitivity will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores above 1 considered indicative of post-operative sensitivity and further categorized for analysis. Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomization will control bias and confounders. Data will be analyzed in SPSS 22 using t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at p≤0.05.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
496

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 3, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 3, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 3, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

July 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

sensitivitycementationpost cementation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Dentinal sensitivity

    Patient-reported sensitivity will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain/sensitivity and 10 indicates the worst possible pain/sensitivity. A VAS score greater than 1 will be considered as post-cementation sensitivity. The scores will also be categorized as: No sensitivity: VAS 0-1 Mild: VAS 2-3 Moderate: VAS 4-7 Severe: VAS 8-10

    At 24 hours, one week, one month, 2 months and three months after cementation

Study Arms (2)

Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will receive fixed prostheses cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) according to manufacturer's instructions. Tooth preparation will be carried out by postgraduate trainees, and cementation will include light curing of RMGIC for 10 seconds using an LED light. Sensitivity will be assessed at 24 hours, one week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post-cementation

Procedure: luting material applaication with Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)

Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will receive fixed prostheses cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC). Tooth preparation and cementation will be performed by the same protocol as the other arm, except no light curing will be involved. Sensitivity levels will be recorded at 24 hours, one week , one month, two months and three months after cementation.

Procedure: luting material applaication with Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)

Interventions

The intervention involves the use of two different types of luting cements-resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC)-for the cementation of fixed dental prostheses. The objective is to compare post-cementation sensitivity between the two materials. All clinical procedures, including tooth preparation, isolation, and cementation, will follow standardized protocols. Sensitivity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 hours and 7 days post-procedure. The study will maintain consistency across both groups, with the only variable being the type of cement used.

Also known as: luting material applaication with Glass Ionomer Cement GIC)
Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC)Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 15 to 70 years
  • Both male and female participants
  • Abutment teeth with vital pulp
  • Sound abutment teeth with no signs of attrition, erosion, or abrasion
  • No history of pulp capping procedures on abutment teeth

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment or who completed it within the last 3 months
  • Use of bleaching or desensitizing agents
  • History of recent periodontal surgery
  • Patients on medications that affect pain perception (e.g., analgesics, carbamazepine)
  • Patients with psychiatric conditions that may affect pain reporting or compliance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dental college

Mingora, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 19130, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp DiseasesToothacheSensation DisordersHypersensitivity

Interventions

Glass Ionomer Cements

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesFacial PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNervous System DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental CementsDental MaterialsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
In this study, masking will be applied to the participants and the outcomes assessor to reduce performance and detection bias. Participants will not be informed about the type of luting cement used during their treatment. The outcomes assessor, responsible for evaluating post-cementation sensitivity, will also be blinded to group allocation to ensure unbiased data collection. However, due to the clinical differences in handling the materials, the care providers and investigators cannot be masked.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study follows a parallel assignment intervention model, where participants are randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. One group will receive resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and the other will receive conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) for luting fixed dental prostheses. Each participant will undergo a standardized clinical procedure including tooth preparation, isolation, and cementation by trained postgraduate trainees. The intervention (type of cement) is applied once, and post-cementation sensitivity will be assessed at 24 hours and 7 days following the procedure. Randomization and stratification will be employed to reduce bias and ensure comparability between groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
saiduCDentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2025

First Posted

August 3, 2025

Study Start

January 25, 2025

Primary Completion

September 3, 2025

Study Completion

September 3, 2025

Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

For ethical issue

Locations