Comparison of Post Cementation Sensitivity Between RMGIC and GIC as Luting Materials in a Randomized Clinical Trial
RMGICvsGIC
1 other identifier
interventional
496
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare post-cementation sensitivity between resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) as luting materials. Conducted at the Prosthodontics Department, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat, the study will enroll 248 patients aged 15-70 with vital abutment teeth, randomly assigned to receive either RMGIC or GIC. Sensitivity will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores above 1 considered indicative of post-operative sensitivity and further categorized for analysis. Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomization will control bias and confounders. Data will be analyzed in SPSS 22 using t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at p≤0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 3, 2025
CompletedSeptember 9, 2025
September 1, 2025
7 months
July 25, 2025
September 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dentinal sensitivity
Patient-reported sensitivity will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain/sensitivity and 10 indicates the worst possible pain/sensitivity. A VAS score greater than 1 will be considered as post-cementation sensitivity. The scores will also be categorized as: No sensitivity: VAS 0-1 Mild: VAS 2-3 Moderate: VAS 4-7 Severe: VAS 8-10
At 24 hours, one week, one month, 2 months and three months after cementation
Study Arms (2)
Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive fixed prostheses cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) according to manufacturer's instructions. Tooth preparation will be carried out by postgraduate trainees, and cementation will include light curing of RMGIC for 10 seconds using an LED light. Sensitivity will be assessed at 24 hours, one week, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months post-cementation
Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive fixed prostheses cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC). Tooth preparation and cementation will be performed by the same protocol as the other arm, except no light curing will be involved. Sensitivity levels will be recorded at 24 hours, one week , one month, two months and three months after cementation.
Interventions
The intervention involves the use of two different types of luting cements-resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC)-for the cementation of fixed dental prostheses. The objective is to compare post-cementation sensitivity between the two materials. All clinical procedures, including tooth preparation, isolation, and cementation, will follow standardized protocols. Sensitivity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 hours and 7 days post-procedure. The study will maintain consistency across both groups, with the only variable being the type of cement used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 15 to 70 years
- Both male and female participants
- Abutment teeth with vital pulp
- Sound abutment teeth with no signs of attrition, erosion, or abrasion
- No history of pulp capping procedures on abutment teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment or who completed it within the last 3 months
- Use of bleaching or desensitizing agents
- History of recent periodontal surgery
- Patients on medications that affect pain perception (e.g., analgesics, carbamazepine)
- Patients with psychiatric conditions that may affect pain reporting or compliance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dental college
Mingora, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 19130, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In this study, masking will be applied to the participants and the outcomes assessor to reduce performance and detection bias. Participants will not be informed about the type of luting cement used during their treatment. The outcomes assessor, responsible for evaluating post-cementation sensitivity, will also be blinded to group allocation to ensure unbiased data collection. However, due to the clinical differences in handling the materials, the care providers and investigators cannot be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- saiduCDentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2025
First Posted
August 3, 2025
Study Start
January 25, 2025
Primary Completion
September 3, 2025
Study Completion
September 3, 2025
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For ethical issue