NCT06535035

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation in participants undergoing dental implant placement. A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 62 participants requiring dental implant placement, divided into two groups of 31 each. Immediately after implant placement, one group received diode laser photobiomodulation, while the SHAM group received sham treatment. Pain and inflammation were assessed at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. In addition, Modified Dental Anxiety (MDA) levels were measured and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to assess oral health-related quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 10, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 29, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

laser; pain, dental implant , quality of life , MDA

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain levels assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS)

    A score of 0 indicated no pain while 10 indicated the worst pain possible

    24h-48h,7 days

  • inflammation evels assessed with the visual analogue scale

    A score of 0 indicated no inflammation while 10 indicated the worst inflammation possible

    24h-48h,7 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS)

    at day 0 and 7 days

  • OHIP-14sp

    at 0 and at 7 days

Study Arms (2)

Group1 laser therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Data collection, informed consent, a complete clinical and oral evaluation, as well as a radiological study with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A surgical intervention was performed with the placement of dental implants. In the experimental group, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was applied immediately after the placement of the implants in a single session with an EPIC X Biolase diode laser (BIOLASE, Inc., USA), voltage 100-240 V, 1.5 A, power 0.5 W, 10-20 J, for 10-30 seconds. It was applied to three points in the area: buccal side, palatal/lingual side, and occlusal side to stimulate the tissue.Pain and inflammation were evaluated using visual analog scales (VAS) from day 0 to 7 days postoperatively. Additionally, MDA levels were measured and the OHIP-14 questionnaire was used to assess oral health-related quality of life

Device: laser therapy After implant surgery, laser therapy (LLLT) was applied

group Sham

SHAM COMPARATOR

data collection, informed consent, a complete clinical and oral evaluation, as well as a radiological study with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Surgical intervention was performed with the placement of dental implants. In the group sham comparate p, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was applied inactive . Pain and inflammation were evaluated using visual analog scales (VAS) from day 0 to 7 days postoperatively. Additionally, MDA levels were measured and the OHIP-14 questionnaire was used to assess oral health-related quality of life

Device: SHAM

Interventions

After implant surgery, laser therapy (LLLT) was applied a single session with an EPIC X Biolase diode laser (BIOLASE, Inc., USA)

Also known as: Experimental
Group1 laser therapy
SHAMDEVICE

After implant surgery, After implant surgery, laser therapy (LLLT) was applied in the same manner but without activating it

Also known as: After implant surgery, laser therapy (LLLT) was applied without activating it
group Sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants who needed dental implant rehabilitation and signed the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with a poor general health status, decompensated chronic diseases, pregnant women, and those with bleeding disorders were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pia Lopez Jornet

Murcia, 30008, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Qu C, Luo F, Hong G, Wan Q. Effects of photobiomodulation therapy on implant stability and postoperative recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;60(5):e712-e721. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.01.014. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

    PMID: 35490059BACKGROUND
  • Heidari M, Paknejad M, Jamali R, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Fekrazad R, Moslemi N. Effect of laser photobiomodulation on wound healing and postoperative pain following free gingival graft: A split-mouth triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2017 Jul;172:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 18.

    PMID: 28549319BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ToothacheSensation DisordersPain

Interventions

Laser TherapyLow-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesFacial PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativePhototherapy

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
During the initial evaluation, data collection, informed consent, a complete clinical and oral evaluation, as well as a radiological study with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were carried out. Subsequently, surgical intervention was performed with the placement of dental implants. In the experimental group, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was applied, while a placebo procedure (SHAM) was used in the control group. Pain and inflammation were evaluated using visual analog scales (VAS) from day 0 to 7 days postoperatively. Additionally, MDA levels were measured and the OHIP-14 questionnaire was used to assess oral health-related quality of life
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Oral Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2024

First Posted

August 2, 2024

Study Start

January 10, 2022

Primary Completion

January 10, 2024

Study Completion

June 10, 2024

Last Updated

August 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations