Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients
Local Anesthesia With SleeperOne® Device vs Traditional Syringe for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to assess if there are differences on perceived pain during local anesthesia performed with SleeperOne device or with a traditional syringe in pediatric patients. Patients responding to the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate to the study. After signing the informed consent, they will undergo local anesthesia procedure on first or second primary molars for the subsequent performing of dental filling. The split-mouth design will randomly allocate first or second primary molar from one quadrant to SleeperOne procedure, while the contralateral one will be subdued to local anesthesia with traditional syringe. After the procedure, patients will be asked to assess the perceived pain with a Visual Analogue Scale from a range 0-10. VAS scales will be used to assess sensations of "size" (related to the two instruments), bitter and vomit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 21, 2022
CompletedSeptember 22, 2022
September 1, 2022
14 days
September 3, 2022
September 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain measure
Self-reported pain by the patient immediately after local anesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no pain, 10 - worst possible pain) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no hurt' and 10 being 'hurts worst'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their pain and see a number that matches it.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Size sensation
Baseline
Bitter sensation
Baseline
Vomit sensation
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
SleeperOne
EXPERIMENTALSleeperOne S4 (Revello S.p.A., Verona, Italy) appliance will be used for the administration of local anesthetic.
Traditional anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia will be performed with a traditional syringe (0480-1, ASA Dental, Massarosa, LU, Italy).
Interventions
Local anesthetic injection of articaine 4% + adrenaline 1/100.000 (Septanest, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) with 30G - 9 mm needle (DENTAL HI TEC, ZI de l'Appentière, Mazières-en-Mauges, France).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presence of dental caries requiring filling with local anesthesia on first or second primary molar
- presence of dental caries requiring filling with local anesthesia on the contralateral primary molar
You may not qualify if:
- gingivitis
- dental abscesses, facial traumas/injuries
- drugs (NSAIDS, paracetamol, antibiotics)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatrics - University of Pavia
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Palm AM, Kirkegaard U, Poulsen S. The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):481-4.
PMID: 15646908BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Scribante, DDS, PhD
University of Pavia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2022
First Posted
September 8, 2022
Study Start
September 7, 2022
Primary Completion
September 21, 2022
Study Completion
September 21, 2022
Last Updated
September 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will be available upon motivated request to the Principal Investigator.