NCT02137967

Brief Summary

Formocresol (FC) is the most universally taught and most widely used pulpotomy medicament in the primary teeth. However, concerns have been raised over the use of FC because of its toxicity and potential carcinogenicity. A substitution for FC has been investigated but evidence is lacking to conclude which is the most appropriate technique for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) has been used in root canal irrigant for more than 80 years, and it is at present the most popular irrigant in root canal treatment. Studies have showed that NaOCl is biological compatible and is a very good antimicrobial solution without being a pulpal irritant. Recent studies using sodium hypochlorite as pulpotomy medicament in primary molars showed promising results. In this project, the investigators propose a randomized clinical trial, which will be performed in Pediatric Dentistry Department of the National Taiwan University Hospital, to compare the treatment outcomes between NaOCl and FC in human primary molars needing pulpotomy treatment. The aim of this sudy is to determining weather NaOCl is a suitable replacement for FC in the pulpotomy of human primary molar teeth. To assess this aim, 200 healthy children from 2.5 to 9 year-old, who have at least one primary first or second molars diagnosed to receive pulpotomy treatment will be recruited in this project. The involved teeth will be randomly assigned to the control group (dilute 20% Formocresol (DFC)) or experimental group (2.5% NaOCl). At 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post-treatment, the randomly assigned teeth will be clinically and radiographically evaluated by blinded independent evaluators to the treatment group. The differences will be statistically analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and t-test, using a statistical significance at p\<0.05.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Longer than P75 for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2012

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2014

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of Clinical Findings

    The outcome will be assessed first by clinical findings. We can discriminate the result are successful or not by scoring the clinical finding from 1 to 4 . Criteria for clinical scoring 1. Asymptomatic, clinical score=1 2. Slight discomfort: percussion sensitivity; mobility\>1mm but\<2mm, clinical score=2 3. Minor discomfort :long-lasting chewing sensitivity; gingival swelling; periodontal pocket formation without exudate; mobility\>2mm but\<3mm, clinical score=3 4. major discomfort: Late pathological changes; spontaneous pain; periodontal pocket formation with exudate; sinus tract; mobility≧3 mm; premature tooth loss due to pathology, clinical score=4

    At 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post-treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of Radiographic Findings

    At 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post-treatment

Study Arms (2)

NaOCl pulpotomy

EXPERIMENTAL

Use 2.5% NaOCl as pulpotomy medication

Procedure: NaOCl pulpotomyDrug: 2.5% NaOCl

FC pulpotomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Use 20% Formocresol as pulpotomy medicament

Procedure: FC pulpotomyDrug: 20% Formocresol

Interventions

Use 2.5% NaOCl as pulpotomy medicament for primary molars

NaOCl pulpotomy
FC pulpotomyPROCEDURE

Use 20% Formocresol as pulpotomy medicament for primary molars

FC pulpotomy
NaOCl pulpotomy
FC pulpotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Months - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • healthy, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system class I children
  • age between 2.5 and 9 years old
  • with one or more primary molars need pulpotomy treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • children younger than 2.5 or older than 9 years of age

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pediatric dental department, National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Diseases

Interventions

formocresol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hsiao-Hua Chang, phD

    Assistant Professor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hsiao-Hua Chang, phD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2012

First Posted

May 14, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 14, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations