Sedentary Activities and Passive-to-Intense Effects on Neuro-Cognitive States
SAPIENS
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prolonged sedentary behavior is linked to poorer metabolic health, yet its effect on cognitive load and brain function remains unclear. Evidence indicates that "mentally active" sedentary tasks (e.g., reading) may support cognition, whereas "mentally passive" tasks (e.g., scrolling social media) may impair it. The cognitive demands associated with these behaviors across the general population are still poorly defined. This project will compare the acute neurophysiological and perceptual responses elicited by mentally active versus passive sedentary tasks across various age groups and in individuals with specific health conditions (i.e., obesity), clarifying how these behaviors differ in the cognitive load they impose. Neuro-cognitive, physiological, and perceptual responses will be assessed with a multimodal battery that includes portable electroencephalography combined with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (EEG + fNIRS; MUSE), eye-tracking (Pupil Core), alertness and visual fatigue via critical flicker fusion testing (CFFT; Lafayette Instrument), autonomic balance through heart-rate variability (HRV) recorded with a Polar H10 monitor, and the self-reported cognitive load assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). We hypothesise that mentally passive sedentary activities will elicit a lower cognitive load than mentally active tasks. By comparing different age groups and health conditions within a single protocol, the study will generate an initial set of group-specific data; subsequent independent studies can build on these findings to explore moderation effects in greater depth. Collectively, the results will provide both the theoretical rationale and the empirical evidence needed to sustain the "mentally active" versus "mentally passive" terminology in sedentary-behaviour research, with the ultimate aim of improving mental and cognitive health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2026
ExpectedJuly 25, 2025
July 1, 2025
10 months
July 6, 2025
July 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Electroencephalography-derived cortical activity (EEG)
This outcome will be evaluated using a portable EEG system (MUSE Athena), which will evaluate four types of brain waves-alpha (8-12 Hz), gamma (31-90 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz)-along with two wave ratios: theta/alpha and beta/alpha.
Day 1 and 2
Hemodynamic Response (fNIRS)
This outcome will be evaluated using a portable functional near-infrared spectroscopy system (fNIRS) in the MUSE headband, assessing changes in oxyhemoglobin (HbO) and deoxyhemoglobin (HbR) concentrations in the prefrontal cortex.
Day 1 and 2
Eye-Tracking Metrics
This outcome will be evaluated using a validated portable eye tracker (Pupil Core) to assess eye metrics.
Day 1 and 2
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
This outcome will be evaluated using a chest strap device connected wirelessly to a tablet (Polar H10). Changes in HRV and heart rate are analyzed as a physiological marker (autonomic balance).
Day 1 and 2
Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold (Flicker Fusion)
This outcome will be evaluated using the Flicker Fusion System (Lafayette Instrument Company) with the "coincident" stimulus to determine the critical flicker fusion threshold (Hz).
Day 1 and 2
Self-Reported Cognitive Load (NASA-TLX)
The Self-Reported Cognitive Load is measured using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive load. Capturing subjective workload across six dimensions: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, effort, performance, and frustration.
day 2
Study Arms (3)
Baseline Cognitive Condition
ACTIVE COMPARATORMaximum Cognitive Load Condition
ACTIVE COMPARATORExperimental Mentally Active and Mentally Passive Sedentary Activities
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants will perform a working memory task (through N-back 1-to-3) to evaluate the upper limit of cognitive demand.
Participants will engage in 7 activities, presented in a randomly assigned order across two separate days, to assess their impact on cognitive load: 1. playing a videogame (Tetris ®) 2. listening a podcast (including a final question) 3. watching a documentary (including a final question) 4. reading a document extract (including a final question) 5. watch a reality show extract (including a final question) 6. listening music, they like it 7. scrolling their Tik-Tok/Instagram
Participants will sit quietly for 5 minutes to establish baseline spontaneous neurophysiological parameters.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 5 to 17 years, attending school.
- Adults aged 18 and above, without an upper age limit.
- Participants with and without specific health conditions, such as obesity.
- Ability to perform sedentary activities and comprehend instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe visual impairments affecting reading or text visualization.
- Use of conventional glasses and history of migraine or epilepsy (due to preventive request for the flicker fusion test)
- Current use of medications that significantly influence cognitive function (unless the health condition being evaluated requires it).
- Other conditions interfering with cognitive or neurophysiological assessments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Viña del Mar, Chile
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Doble-blind. Both participants and the statistician were blinded to the intervention condition; however, the assessors administering the activities were not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2025
First Posted
July 25, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07