State of the Art Immediate Implant Placement in the Premaxilla
A Clinical Study on Immediate Implant Placement in the Premaxilla With Flapless Guided Surgery, Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation and Immediate Provisionalization
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to learn how well immediate implant placement works in the front upper jaw (premaxilla) when using flapless guided surgery, hard and soft tissue augmentation, and immediate provisional crowns. It will also learn about the safety and esthetic results of this treatment approach. The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary: How much buccal bone thickness remains one year after implant placement 1mm below the implant shoulder? Secondary:
- How do patients rate pain, healing, and esthetics after treatment?
- Are there any complications over the course of five years?
- How much buccal bone thickness remains one year after implant placement 3mm and 5mm below the implant shoulder?
- Marginal bone loss at one-year and five-year follow-up?
- Peri-implant health at one-year and five-year follow-up?
- Soft tissue changes at one-year and five-year follow-up? Researchers will compare treatment results in patients with intact bone sockets to those with damaged (non-intact) sockets. Participants will:
- Receive a dental implant and temporary crown on the same day as the tooth extraction
- Undergo guided, flapless surgery with bone and soft tissue grafting
- Take antibiotics and anti-inflammatories for 4 days after surgery
- Visit the clinic at 1 week, 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years for follow-up exams
- Have X-rays, digital scans, and photos taken to measure bone and soft tissue changes
- Answer questions about pain and esthetic satisfaction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2032
November 18, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.6 years
June 23, 2025
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Buccal bone thickness -1 (mm)
Buccal bone thickness at 1 mm below the implant shoulder at one-year follow-up as assessed on a three-dimensional radiograph.
moment of enrollment and 1-year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Patient reported outcomes
one week after surgery
Pink Esthetic Score
enrollment, 1-year, 5-year
Buccal bone thickness -3 and -5 (mm)
enrollment and 1-year
Marginal bone loss
1-, 5-year
Peri-implant health
1-, 5-year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Immediate implant placement
EXPERIMENTALState of the art immediate implant placement with socket grafting and soft tissue augmentation.
Interventions
Immediate implant placement with socket grafting and soft tissue augmentation. In cases with a buccal dehiscence \>3mm only this technique is applied. In cases with a buccal dehiscence between 4-6mm a collagen membrane is applied prior to socket grafting. In cases with a buccal dehiscence \> 6 mm, a collagen membrane is also applied and a mixture of C-DBBM and autogenous bone chips (1:1 ratio) is used as grafting material.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 20 years old
- Good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25%
- Presence of one or more incisors, cuspids or premolars in the maxilla that need to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present
- At least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveoli as assessed on a three-dimensional radiograph to ensure primary implant stability
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy (will be explicitly asked)
- Systemic diseases
- Smoking; suppuration
- \> 1 mm gingival asymmetry between the failing teeth and contralateral teeth
- Failing teeth outside the bone envelop as assessed on a three-dimensional radiograph
- Untreated periodontal disease; untreated caries lesions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (2)
Ghent University
Ghent, East Flanders, 9000, Belgium
Bv Dr. Cosyn
Zottegem, East Flanders, 9620, Belgium
Related Publications (6)
Pitman J, Christiaens V, Callens J, Glibert M, Seyssens L, Blanco J, Cosyn J. Immediate implant placement with flap or flapless surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50(6):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13795. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
PMID: 36843361BACKGROUNDIckroth A, Christiaens V, Pitman J, Cosyn J. A Systematic Review on Immediate Implant Placement in Intact Versus Non-Intact Alveolar Sockets. J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 3;14(7):2462. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072462.
PMID: 40217911BACKGROUNDFurhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
PMID: 16307569BACKGROUNDBotticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x.
PMID: 15367183BACKGROUNDAssaf JH, Assaf DD, Antoniazzi RP, Osorio LB, Franca FM. Correction of Buccal Dehiscence During Immediate Implant Placement Using the Flapless Technique: A Tomographic Evaluation. J Periodontol. 2017 Feb;88(2):173-180. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160276. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PMID: 27620655BACKGROUNDBarone A, Toti P, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Saverio M, Covani U. Esthetic Outcome of Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets by Clinicians with or without Experience: A Medium-Term Retrospective Evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):1397-1406. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4646.
PMID: 27861667BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- As this prospective study concerns a surgical intervention, patients and treating clinicians can not be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2025
First Posted
July 23, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2032
Last Updated
November 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11