Using of Implants With a Sloped Platform Edge
The Use of Implants With a Sloped Platform Edge in Patients With Ridge Atrophy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An interventional prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in parallel groups. The sample size consisted of 30 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of surgical intervention. The first group received implants with a sloped edge platform (Dentsply Sirona CIS, ASTRA TECH Implant System, registered in Russia on 21/12/2019, No. РЗН 2015/3214). The second group received implants with bone grafting. The assessment in the postoperative period included evaluating the condition of the soft tissues, bone resorption, number of analgesics, duration of the operation, edema, keratinized mucosa width, implant stability quotient, pain severity, and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2024
April 1, 2024
2 years
April 29, 2024
May 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
determination of the level of the marginal bone
This parameter was determined by analyzing radiovisiography performed on the Vatech EzSensor device (Vatech, South Korea) with an X-ray load of 2μSv 6 months after the operation (after completion of prosthetics). The radiographs were studied using X-ray software on a 27-inch monitor (ASUS) with a screen resolution of 2560 × 1440 pixels. The marginal bone level was assessed using a measuring tool built into the program. The reference point for measurement was the implant shoulder on the medial and distal sides.
Day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Secondary Outcomes (27)
Attached mucosa measurement
day 0 (initial value)]
Attached mucosa measurement
day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Evaluation of soft tissue aesthetics
day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)]
Assessment of the quality of life
Day 0 (initial value).]
Assessment of the quality of life
Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value
- +22 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Slope Implant
EXPERIMENTALThe patients received implants with a sloped platform edge.
Implant and guided bone regeneration
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients received implants and guided bone regeneration
Interventions
1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation 2. Placement of the Astra Tech Implant EV Profile (Astra Tech Implant System®; Dentsply Sirona CIS, Sweden) 3. Placement healing abutment 4. Suturing the wound tightly
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Availability of voluntary informed consent to participate in the study.
- The presence of an H1I bone defect according to the Cologne classification.
- Neighboring teeth without hard tissue pathologies and periodontal pathologies.
- Full sanitation of the oral cavity.
- The presence of concomitant pathology in the stage of decompensation;
- Hard smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day);
- Radio and chemotherapy in history over the past 5 years;
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding;
- Taking medications that affect the healing of soft tissues (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, steroid drugs).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy following entrance into the study;
- Patients having poor oral hygiene or not wanting to carry out oral hygiene measures;
- Patients who, for one reason or another, could not complete the entire protocol to the end.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Moscow, Russia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2024
First Posted
May 8, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD sharing is impossible because of the recommendation of the local ethics committee, the provision of data is possible upon receipt of an official request addressed to the chief researcher