Artificial Intelligence-assisted Colonoscopy in the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in increasing adenoma detection rate and the accuracy in the characterization of colorectal lesions, compared to standard colonoscopy, in a randomized controlled clinical trial setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedJuly 16, 2025
July 1, 2025
1 year
May 22, 2025
July 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with at least one adenoma detected, confirmed by histopathological analysis, during colonoscopy, in the AI group vs. control group
The measure will be expressed as the number and percentage (%) of patients with at least one adenoma detected during colonoscopy and confirmed by histopathological analysis, comparing the AI and non-AI groups (CAD EYE). Detection will be based on the analysis of biopsies performed and processed according to the standard protocol.
7 days after colonoscopy (estimated time for histopathological report release).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of CAD EYE for characterization of lesions as neoplastic (adenoma) or non-neoplastic (hyperplastic), compared to histopathological analysis as the gold standard.
7 days after colonoscopy
Study Arms (2)
Colonoscopy with the aid of artificial intelligence
ACTIVE COMPARATORStratum 1: Patients aged 18 to 44 years Stratum 2: Patients aged 45 to 75 years Stratum 3: Patients aged 76 years or older
Colonoscopy without the aid of artificial intelligence
ACTIVE COMPARATORStratum 1: Patients aged 18 to 44 years Stratum 2: Patients aged 45 to 75 years Stratum 3: Patients aged 76 years or older
Interventions
This single-center, randomized, open-label clinical trial will assess the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy versus standard high-definition colonoscopy in detecting and characterizing colorectal lesions. Conducted over 12 months in São Paulo, Brazil, the study will include 100 adult patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants will be stratified by age and randomized (1:1) after sedation. All lesions will be resected, recorded, and analyzed histologically. The intervention group will also include AI output data (CAD EYE). The primary goals are to evaluate adenoma detection rate (ADR) and AI diagnostic accuracy. Given the global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in developing countries, this study aims to provide real-world data on the impact of AI in CRC screening.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18 years or older, with an elective indication for colonoscopy who sign the informed consent form agreeing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- History of inflammatory bowel disease.
- History of colorectal cancer.
- Personal history of colorectal surgery.
- Contraindication to endoscopic biopsies.
- History of intestinal polyposis syndromes.
- Urgent or emergency cases.
- Presence of severe, decompensated comorbidities, or with a score of 3 or higher according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
- Incomplete colonoscopy that does not reach the cecum.
- Insufficient or inadequate bowel preparation, with a score lower than 6 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
- Patients who do not agree to participate in the study and do not sign the informed consent form (ICF).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
Related Links
- Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, Rabeneck L, Sauer BG, Rex DK. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol \[Internet\]. 2021 Mar;116(3):458-79.
- Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, et al. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. N Engl J Med \[Internet\]. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306
- Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, et al. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology \[Internet\]. 2020 Aug;159(2):512-520.e7.
- Wang P, Liu X, Berzin TM, Glissen Brown JR, Liu P, Zhou C, et al. Effect of a deeplearning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol \[Internet\].
- Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J, Mu G, Shen L, Liu J, et al. Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol \[Internet\]. 2020 Apr;5(4):352-61.
- Liu W-N, Zhang Y-Y, Bian X-Q, Wang L-J, Yang Q, Zhang X-D, et al. Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial-intelligence-aided colonoscopy. Saudi J Gastroenterol \[Internet\]. 2020;26(1):13
- Aihara H, Saito S, Inomata H, Ide D, Tamai N, Ohya TR, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal lesions using 'real-time' numerical color analysis during autofluorescence endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol \[Internet\]. 2013 Apr;25(4):4
- Kominami Y, Yoshida S, Tanaka S, Sanomura Y, Hirakawa T, Raytchev B, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyp histology by using a real-time image recognition system and narrow-band imaging magnifying colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc \[Internet
- Kuiper T, Alderlieste Y, Tytgat K, Vlug M, Nabuurs J, Bastiaansen B, et al. Automatic optical diagnosis of small colorectal lesions by laser-induced autofluorescence. Endoscopy \[Internet\]. 2014 Sep 29;47(01):56-62.
- Rath T, Tontini G, Vieth M, Nägel A, Neurath M, Neumann H. In vivo real-time assessment of colorectal polyp histology using an optical biopsy forceps system based on laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy. Endoscopy \[Internet\].
- Keats AS. The ASA Classification of Physical Status-A Recapitulation. Anesthesiology \[Internet\]. 1978 Oct 1;49(4):233-5.
- Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc \[Internet\]. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92
- Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol \[Internet\]. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51
- Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, Hosobe S, Kusaka H, Kobayashi T, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol \[Internet\]. 1994 Oct 1;47(10):880-5.
- Kimura T, Yamamoto E, Yamano H, Suzuki H, Kamimae S, Nojima M, et al. A Novel Pit Pattern Identifies the Precursor of Colorectal Cancer Derived From Sessile Serrated Adenoma. Am J Gastroenterol \[Internet\]. 2012 Mar;107(3):460- 9
- Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc \[Internet\]. 2003 Dec;58(6):S3-43.
- Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut \[Internet\]. 2002 Jul 1;51(1):130-1.
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform \[Internet\]. 2019 Jul;95:103208
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistente - Endoscopia ICESP
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2025
First Posted
July 15, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We do not plan to share Individual Participant Data (IPD) with other researchers due to privacy concerns and the nature of the study