Self-controlled Practice on Motor Learning and Motivation in Parkinson's Disease
Effects of Self-controlled Practice on Motor Learning and Motivation in People With Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
observational
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People with Parkinson's disease have been known to have low motivation and motor learning impairment, which might limit the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation, exacerbate motor performance and quality of life, and increase the burden on caregivers. Therefore, enhancing motor learning ability and motivation is crucial for people with PD. According to the OPTIMAL theory, practice under self-controlled conditions has been shown to improve motivation and learning in healthy individuals. However, few studies have explored the effects of self-controlled practice on motor learning and motivation in people with PD and examined the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. This study aims to investigate the effects of self-controlled practice on motor learning and motivation in people with PD, as well as the associated neurophysiological changes. People with PD and age-matched healthy controls without neurological disorders will be recruited. Participants will be pair-matched based on age, gender, and disease severity, and then assigned to either the self-controlled group or the yoked group. The participants will be required to visit the lab for a total of three times in one week: on Day 1 for baseline assessments, neurophysiological evaluation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), practice of the trajectory matching task, motivation evaluation, and exercise education; on Day 2 for additional trajectory matching task practice, motivation evaluation, immediate retention test of the task, neurophysiological evaluation using TMS, and exercise education; and on Day 7 for delayed retention and transfer tests and final TMS assessment. On Days 1 and 2, all participants will practice the trajectory matching task. At the beginning of each trial, a target trajectory will be shown, and participants will be asked to replicate it using a joystick. Feedback will be provided after each trial to indicate accuracy. The self-controlled group will be allowed to choose the story contents they prefer when practicing the task, and the exercise they would like to learn after the task. In contrast, yoked participants will receive the same story and exercise education as their matched counterparts in the self-controlled group. This study will help clarify the effects of self-controlled practice on motor learning and motivation in people with PD, offering a new perspective for clinical interventions and emphasizing the importance of patients actively participating in treatment planning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
August 27, 2025
June 1, 2025
2 years
June 8, 2025
August 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Root mean square error (RMSE)
The accuracy of the overall performance of the target waveform trajectory. The RMSE is the mean difference between the target waveform trajectory and the participant's performed waveform trajectory calculated over their actual movement time. Smaller RMSE value indicates better task performance. With a total of 144 trials practiced during the practice phase on D1 and D2, the RMSE will be averaged every 12 trials as a block for later data analysis and presentation, resulting in a total of 12 practice blocks (B1 to B12), 2 retention test blocks (imme-ret and delay-ret) and 1 transfer test block (xfer).
Day 1 (practice phase), day 2 (practice phase and immediate retention), and day 7 (delayed retention and transfer)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Error estimation (EE) test
Day 2 (immediate retention) and day 7 (delayed retention and transfer)
Motivation evaluation
Day 1 and 2
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment
Day 1, 2, and 7
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Day 1
Apathy Evaluation Scale
Day 1
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
PD self-controlled group
PD participants in the choice condition
PD yoked group
PD participants in the no-choice condition
HC self-controlled group
Healthy controls in the choice condition
HC yoked group
Healthy controls in the no-choice condition
Eligibility Criteria
Participants with PD are idiopathic PD diagnosed by a neurologist. Healthy controls are without any neurological disorders.
You may qualify if:
- age above 20-year-old
- able to follow instructions and the rules of the motor task
- do not have surgery or injury in their upper extremities in the past 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- neurological disorders other than PD
- symptoms of severe tremor in upper extremities
- symptoms of anxiety and depression
- deep brain stimulator or pacemaker implanted in the body
- history of seizure or epilepsy
- unstable medical conditions
- migraines or tinnitus uncontrolled by medication
- pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy
Taipei, Zhongzheng Dist., 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (3)
Lewthwaite R, Chiviacowsky S, Drews R, Wulf G. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1383-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7.
PMID: 25732095BACKGROUNDWulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1382-1414. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9.
PMID: 26833314BACKGROUNDChiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Campos T. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2012 Apr;35(4):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
PMID: 22209649BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy
National Taiwan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2025
First Posted
June 19, 2025
Study Start
July 8, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
August 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share