Multiple Practice Contexts to Reduce Context-dependent Learning in PD
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Context-dependent learning (CDL) is a phenomenon that an individual demonstrates superior motor performance in the environmental context in which a task was originally learned and practiced, while the performance may decrease if carried out in a novel context. It has often been observed that after individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) learned how to walk in a clinical setting, they appear to have difficulty generalizing the learned walking ability back to their home or community. To date, no effective intervention approaches have been designed to resolve this CDL for people with PD. One approach that could potentially reduce CDL is to practice a motor task in multiple contexts. Learning a task in multiple contexts would make the participants less likely to rely on the inconsistent ambient contextual information, and could facilitate the generation of stronger motor program and schema. No studies to date have investigated the effects of multiple practice contexts on reducing CDL in people with PD. It is also not clear the characteristics of the participants who would benefit from this type of intervention. This study aims to investigate the effects of gait training in multiple practice contexts on CDL in individuals with PD. Additionally, this study aims to identify the characteristics of the participants who benefit from the intervention. Sixty-four participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD will be recruited and randomized into 2 groups: Single-room and Two-room groups. The participants will receive 45 minutes of treadmill training and 15 minutes of over-ground gait training for 12 sessions. Throughout the training sessions, the Single-room group will practice walking in the same room, while the Two-room group will receive gait training in 2 distinct rooms. All participants will be assessed by a blinded evaluator before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the intervention. The participants will undergo a series of cognitive, motor behavior, and neurophysiological examinations. Group × time repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the partial eta square (η2) will be calculated to determine the intervention effects on the outcome measures. Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to determine the demographic, cognitive and motor behavior, and neurophysiological characteristics of participants who benefit from the proposed interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Dec 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 16, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.6 years
December 3, 2017
March 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Context-dependent learning
To evaluate context-dependent learning, a finger sequence task has been specially designed. The participants will use an enlarged keyboard to complete the designed computer finger sequence task.
45 mins
10-Meter Walk Test (10-MWT)
The walking ability of the participants with PD will be assessed with the 10-MWT. The participants will be instructed to walk along a 10-meter walkway in their comfortable and fastest walking speed. Gait parameters including velocity, stride length, cadence, strike angle and lift-off angle will be calculated.
5 mins
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
The participants will initially sit on a comfortable chair with hips and knees flexed at 90°. Upon a 'GO' signal, the participants will stand up from the chair, walk for 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The participants will be instructed to complete the task at their preferred/ comfortable speed. Good to excellent test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability have been established in people with PD.
5 mins
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale will be used to examine an individual's confidence level of not falling when performing activities of daily living. The ABC Scale contains 16 different activities performed indoors and outdoors. The participants will be asked to rate their confidence level (range from 0% to 100% of confidence) of not falling for each item. An average score of the 16 items (range from 0% to 100%) will be calculated to determine the participant's confidence level of not falling when performing the activities of daily living. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ABC scale in patients with PD were excellent.
5 mins
Corticomotor excitability
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to evaluate corticomotor excitability. Corticomotor excitability outcomes will include resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoke potential (MEP), cortical silent period (CSP) duration, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). The RMT could reflect the membrane excitability of the corticospinal neurons and the cortical interneurons. Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude is an indicator of the integrity and excitability of the corticospinal tract. The CSP is a period when EMG activity being suppressed for a few hundred milliseconds after the MEP, and has often been used as an indicator of the inhibitory mechanism occurs within the corticospinal tract. The SICI, ICF, and LICI have been identified to be good indicators of intracortical inhibition and facilitation.
45 mins
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
10 mins
The Stroop Color-Word test
5 mins
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
10 mins
Five Times Sit-to-Stand (FTSTS) Test
5 mins
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
10 mins
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Single-room group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants assigned to the Single-room group will receive treadmill training and overground gait training in one room (Room A) throughout the training sessions.
Two-room group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants in the Two-room group will receive treadmill training and overground gait training in 2 rooms (Room A and B) in an alternating order.
Interventions
The participants will be randomized into two different groups, and they will receive treadmill and overground gait training in one or two rooms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- able to follow instructions to perform the tasks (Mini Mental State Examination ≥ 24)
- able to read and hear properly without or with aids (e.g., eyeglasses or hearing aids)
- can walk independently with or without devices
You may not qualify if:
- has other neurological disorders in addition to PD
- has deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implanted in their body
- has a family-history of epilepsy
- has a self-history of seizure
- has unstable medical conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Lee YY, Tai CH, Fisher BE. Training in Varying Environmental Contexts Facilitates Transfer of Improved Gait Performance to New Contexts for Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct;103(10):1917-1923. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
PMID: 35810822DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ya-Yun Lee, PhD
National Taiwan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2017
First Posted
December 11, 2017
Study Start
December 25, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2020
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03