NCT07020455

Brief Summary

  1. 1.Diagnosis and Indication You have been diagnosed with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) hypermobility and/or dysfunction, characterized by symptoms such as jaw clicking, locking, pain in the joint area, or difficulty in opening and closing the mouth. After clinical and radiographic evaluation, the recommended treatment includes arthrocentesis and prolotherapy, either alone or in combination.
  2. 2.Description of Procedures
  3. 3.Benefits and Expected Outcomes Reduction in TMJ pain and joint clicking
  4. 4.Possible Risks and Complications
  5. 5.Alternatives to the Proposed Procedure
  6. 6.Patient Instructions and Post-Procedure Care Avoid wide mouth opening, yawning, or chewing hard foods for several days

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 13, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

hypermobilitysubluxationprolotherapyarthrocentesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity of TMJ

    Pain intensity of TMJ evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. VAS is designated by an marked horizontal line, 10 mm long, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (intolerable pain), anchored by word identifiers at each end. Patients marked the point on the line that they thought represented their current situation.

    From pre-treatment to the 3rd month after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Maximal interincisal opening (MIO)

    From pre-treatment to the 3rd month after treatment

Other Outcomes (1)

  • TMJ sounds

    From pre-treatment to the 3rd month after treatment

Study Arms (2)

Combined Prolotherapy Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with TMJ hypermobility underwent arthrocentesis for joint pain in addition to prolotherapy.

Drug: prolotherapy solution of 20% dextroseDrug: Arthrocentesis with ringer solution

Traditional Prolotherapy Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prolotherapy was applied to patients with TMJ hypermobility.

Drug: prolotherapy solution of 20% dextrose

Interventions

Polotherapy, it involves injecting an irritant solution into weakened joints, ligaments, or tendons to stimulate collagen production and tissue repair at fibro-osseous junctions.

Combined Prolotherapy GroupTraditional Prolotherapy Group

Integrating arthrocentesis with prolotherapy may enhance therapeutic outcomes by addressing both the mechanical and inflammatory aspects of TMJ hypermobility. This dual-modality technique presents a promising minimally invasive option for clinicians managing patients with joint instability.

Combined Prolotherapy Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 46 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with unilateral or bilateral TMJ hypermobility
  • history of open locking
  • complaints of joint sounds and facial pain
  • treated with combine or traditionally prolotherapy
  • followed for at least 3 months
  • the diagnosis of the patients was confirmed by TMJ radiography

You may not qualify if:

  • patients who underwent discectomy
  • patients with active infection (fever, redness, oedema, loss of function, etc.)
  • pathological findings (tumour, cyst, etc.) in the related area were excluded
  • patients with systemic disorders that could affect the results

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Karadeniz Technical University

Trabzon, Trabzon, 61040, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Comert Kilic S, Gungormus M. Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for the treatment of temporomandibular joint hypermobility? A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;45(7):813-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PMID: 26846795BACKGROUND
  • Dasukil S, Shetty SK, Arora G, Degala S. Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: An Exploratory Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Mar;20(1):115-120. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01328-9. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

    PMID: 33584052BACKGROUND
  • Taskesen F, Cezairli B. Efficacy of prolotherapy and arthrocentesis in management of temporomandibular joint hypermobility. Cranio. 2023 Sep;41(5):423-431. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1861887. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

    PMID: 33326351BACKGROUND
  • Cezairli B, Sivrikaya EC, Omezli MM, Ayranci F, Seyhan Cezairli N. Results of Combined, Single-Session Arthrocentesis and Dextrose Prolotherapy for Symptomatic Temporomandibular Joint Syndrome: A Case Series. J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Oct;23(10):771-777. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0068. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

    PMID: 29017019BACKGROUND
  • Abbadi W, Kara Beit Z, Al-Khanati NM. Arthrocentesis, Injectable Platelet-Rich Plasma and Combination of Both Protocols of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Management: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 Nov 11;14(11):e31396. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31396. eCollection 2022 Nov.

    PMID: 36523721BACKGROUND
  • Dagenais S, Wooley J, Hite M, Green R, Mayer J. Acute toxicity evaluation of proliferol: a dose-escalating, placebo-controlled study in swine. Int J Toxicol. 2009 May-Jun;28(3):219-29. doi: 10.1177/1091581809336478.

    PMID: 19546260BACKGROUND
  • Refai H. Long-term therapeutic effects of dextrose prolotherapy in patients with hypermobility of the temporomandibular joint: a single-arm study with 1-4 years' follow up. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;55(5):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

    PMID: 28460873BACKGROUND
  • Gibaly A, Abdelmoiz M, Alghandour AN. Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial). Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 8;28(9):475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z.

    PMID: 39115583BACKGROUND
  • Zhou H, Hu K, Ding Y. Modified dextrose prolotherapy for recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;52(1):63-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

    PMID: 24064304BACKGROUND
  • Ungor C, Atasoy KT, Taskesen F, Cezairli B, Dayisoylu EH, Tosun E, Senel FC. Short-term results of prolotherapy in the management of temporomandibular joint dislocation. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Mar;24(2):411-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827ff14f.

    PMID: 23524704BACKGROUND
  • Nagori SA, Jose A, Gopalakrishnan V, Roy ID, Chattopadhyay PK, Roychoudhury A. The efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy over placebo for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Dec;45(12):998-1006. doi: 10.1111/joor.12698. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

    PMID: 30024045BACKGROUND
  • Foster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, Gerhardt MB, Rodeo SA. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2259-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921.

    PMID: 19875361BACKGROUND
  • Distel LM, Best TM. Prolotherapy: a clinical review of its role in treating chronic musculoskeletal pain. PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6 Suppl 1):S78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.003.

    PMID: 21703585BACKGROUND
  • Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Nov;49(11):1163-7; discussion 1168-70. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90409-f.

    PMID: 1941330BACKGROUND
  • Rabago D, Slattengren A, Zgierska A. Prolotherapy in primary care practice. Prim Care. 2010 Mar;37(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.09.013.

    PMID: 20188998BACKGROUND
  • Mustafa R, Gungormus M, Mollaoglu N. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Temporomandibular Joint Hypermobility Treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):e461-e465. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004480.

    PMID: 29533255BACKGROUND
  • de Farias JF, Melo SL, Bento PM, Oliveira LS, Campos PS, de Melo DP. Correlation between temporomandibular joint morphology and disc displacement by MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20150023. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150023. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

    PMID: 25806865BACKGROUND
  • Majumdar SK, Krishna S, Chatterjee A, Chakraborty R, Ansari N. Single Injection Technique Prolotherapy for Hypermobility Disorders of TMJ Using 25 % Dextrose: A Clinical Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Jun;16(2):226-230. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0944-0. Epub 2016 Jul 25.

    PMID: 28439165BACKGROUND
  • Refai H, Altahhan O, Elsharkawy R. The efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: a preliminary prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):2962-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.128. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

    PMID: 21757278BACKGROUND
  • Torres DE, McCain JP. Arthroscopic electrothermal capsulorrhaphy for the treatment of recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):681-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 7.

    PMID: 22487806BACKGROUND
  • Ates H, Sivrikaya EC. Is the combine prolotherapy more effective than the traditional prolotherapy in patients with temporomandibular joint hypermobility? J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Dec;53(12):2238-2244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.10.008. Epub 2025 Nov 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint DisordersJoint InstabilityJoint Dislocations

Interventions

GlucoseArthrocentesisRinger's Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Craniomandibular DisordersMandibular DiseasesJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesJoint DiseasesMuscular DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HexosesMonosaccharidesSugarsCarbohydratesParacentesisSpecimen HandlingClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisPuncturesTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative TechniquesIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The first group applied prolotherapy, while the other group applied arthrocentesis and prolotherapy together.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DDS

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2025

First Posted

June 13, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2022

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

June 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
2019-2022

Locations