Injection of Tenoxicam Versus Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis
Does Intra-articular Injection of Tenoxicam After Arthrocentesis Heal Outcomes of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection and to compare it with arthrocentesis alone in patients with TMJ-OA. Thirty patients with TMJ-OA who were treated randomly with either arthrocentesis plus tenoxicam injection (TX group) or arthrocentesis alone (control group) were examined. Maximum mouth opening (MMO), visual analog scale (VAS) pain values, and joint sounds were the outcome variables, which were evaluated at pre-treatment and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started May 2019
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2022
CompletedAugust 11, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.5 years
August 5, 2022
August 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain on Tmj (Visual analog scale(VAS) was used.)
Pain scores of Temporomandibular joint on a visual analog scale.To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no pain and best outcome score; 10 means maximum pain and the worst score.
Change from baseline pain on TMJ at six months
Maximum Mouth Opening(MMO) (A ruler was used)
MMO was gaged with a ruler between the incisal edges of the maxillar and mandibular central incisors when the patient open the mouth maximum. The score was written in mm.
Change from baseline maximum mouth opening at six months
Joint sounds (Visual analog scale was used to measure.)
Temporomandibular joint sounds was measured with Visual analog scale (VAS).To measure the VAS value, a 10-cm-long numbered line was created. The patient chose a point on the line, the corresponding value was measured with a ruler, and a score was given. 0 means no sounds and best outcome score; 10 means maximum sound and the worst score.
Change from baseline joint sounds at six months
Study Arms (2)
Tenoxicam
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Tenoxicam group (n:16) received both arthrocentesis and a 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnly arthrocentesis was given to patients in the control group
Interventions
After arthrocentesis procedure, 2-ml injection of tenoxicam (Oksamen-L, Mustafa Nevzat İlaç Sanayi, Istanbul, Turkey) to the temporomandibular joint
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical and radiological diagnosis of TMJ-OA
- years of age and older
- Sufficient clinical data at baseline and follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled systemic disease
- Neurological disease
- Previous TMJ surgery
- Malignant disease in the head and neck region
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ataturk University
Erzurum, 25240, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Bayramoglu Z, Yavuz GY, Keskinruzgar A, Koparal M, Kaya GS. Does intra-articular injection of tenoxicam after arthrocentesis heal outcomes of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis? A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02852-z.
PMID: 36890529DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zeynep Bayramoglu
Ataturk University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2022
First Posted
August 11, 2022
Study Start
May 3, 2019
Primary Completion
November 7, 2021
Study Completion
April 21, 2022
Last Updated
August 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share