Comparison of Hyaluronic Acid, Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Prolotherapy in TMJ Arthrocentesis
Comparative Evaluation Of Hyaluronic Acid, Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin, And Dextrose Prolotherapy As Adjuncts To Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis In Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
2 other identifiers
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of different intra-articular adjunctive therapies used with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. TMJ arthrocentesis is a minimally invasive procedure commonly used to reduce pain and improve mandibular function in patients with internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. In this study, patients diagnosed with TMJ disorders were treated with arthrocentesis alone or arthrocentesis combined with intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid, injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), or dextrose prolotherapy. Clinical outcomes including pain intensity, mandibular range of motion, and functional improvement were evaluated at different follow-up periods. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these adjunctive treatments and to determine whether any of these intra-articular approaches provides superior clinical outcomes when used with TMJ arthrocentesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2026
CompletedMarch 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
7 months
March 9, 2026
March 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)
Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to evaluate changes in pain levels after temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis alone or in combination with intra-articular hyaluronic acid, injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), or dextrose prolotherapy. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is presented as a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months
Change in Maximum Mouth Opening
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured clinically in millimeters to evaluate improvement in mandibular mobility after temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis alone or in combination with intra-articular hyaluronic acid, injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), or dextrose prolotherapy.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Jaw Functional Limitation Scale Score (JFLS-8)
Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months (The 1-week assessment was not performed because the questionnaire evaluates symptoms over the preceding month; therefore, a 1-week measurement could cause temporal overlap and affect response interpretation.)
Change in Graded Chronic Pain Scale Score (GCPS 2.0)
Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months (The 1-week assessment was not performed because the questionnaire evaluates symptoms over the preceding month; therefore, a 1-week measurement could cause temporal overlap and affect response interpretation.)
Change in Pain Drawing Score
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months
Study Arms (4)
Arthrocentesis Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group underwent temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis using the standard two-needle technique. No additional intra-articular agent was administered following the lavage procedure. This group served as the control group for comparison with adjunctive intra-articular treatments.
Arthrocentesis + Hyaluronic Acid
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Orthovisc) after the lavage procedure.
Arthrocentesis + Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injection of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), an autologous platelet concentrate prepared from the patient's venous blood.
Arthrocentesis + Dextrose Prolotherapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis followed by intra-articular injection of dextrose solution administered as prolotherapy.
Interventions
Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis was performed using a standard two-needle technique to lavage the superior joint space and remove inflammatory mediators.
Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Orthovisc) into the temporomandibular joint following arthrocentesis.
Autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin prepared from the patient's venous blood and injected intra-articularly into the temporomandibular joint following arthrocentesis.
Intra-articular injection of dextrose solution administered as prolotherapy into the temporomandibular joint following arthrocentesis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain, limited mouth opening, and/or unilateral joint pain
- Patients diagnosed with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint classified as DC/TMD
- Patients who did not respond adequately to conservative treatment modalities
- Patients who underwent temporomandibular joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation
- Individuals aged 18-65 years
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who did not provide informed consent or were unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients whose primary source of pain was myofascial pain dysfunction or cervical-origin pain
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients with a known allergy to any of the injected solutions used in the study
- Patients with systemic joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
- Patients with acute infection in the temporomandibular joint region
- Patients with hematological disorders
- Patients with a history of previous temporomandibular joint surgery
- Patients with tumors or malignant neoplasms involving the temporomandibular joint
- Patients with a history of oral or maxillofacial trauma affecting the temporomandibular joint
- Patients who were unable to cooperate with clinical examination or follow-up procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emel Bulut, DDS, PhD
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2026
First Posted
March 18, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
August 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share