Comparative Assessment of Arthrocentesis Methods in TMJ Disorders
Clinical Evaluation of Different Arthrocentesis Techniques in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common conditions in society, characterised by symptoms such as pain, limited movement and joint noises, which negatively affect an individual's quality of life. The primary goal of treatment is to restore the physiological functions of the joint by eliminating the aetiological factors. In cases where conservative methods prove ineffective, arthrocentesis, a minimally invasive approach, comes to the fore. Arthrocentesis aims to reduce pain by removing inflammatory mediators and to increase joint mobility. In this study, the intraoperative parameters and clinical outcomes of different arthrocentesis techniques were compared and evaluated in patients with Wilkes stage 2-3 TME disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedApril 9, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 year
December 24, 2025
April 6, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
TMJ Pain
TMJ Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS ranges from a minimum score of 1 to a maximum score of 10, where 1 indicates the best condition (no pain) and 10 indicates the worst condition (maximum pain). Higher scores on the scale represent greater pain severity. Accordingly, an increase in the score reflects a higher level of perceived pain by the patients.
before the procedure, at 1 month and at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Non-Welded Y-Cannula Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1: The first group underwent arthrocentesis using a method developed by Mun et al., involving two 22-gauge needles bent to form a Y-shape with their angles facing each other.
Welded Y-Cannula Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2: The second group underwent arthrocentesis using a method developed by Rahal et al., involving a factory-made Y-shaped cannula.
Interventions
Y-shaped cannula without a source Arthrocentesis performed by simultaneously and concentrically placing two manually Y-shaped bent needles into the joint cavity.
Y-shaped cannula with a source Arthrocentesis performed by simultaneously and concentrically placing two manually Y-shaped bent needles into the joint cavity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with unilateral TME disorders who:
- Are in stages 2-3 of the Wilkes classification
- Have not undergone interventional treatment prior to arthroscopy
- Have undergone conservative treatment prior to arthroscopy without successful results
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with TME irregularities who have undergone interventional treatment (minimally invasive and invasive)
- Patients with bilateral TME disorders
- Patients with incomplete recorded data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ktu Dentistry
Trabzon, Ortahisar, 61000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Senturk MF, Yazici T, Gulsen U. Techniques and modifications for TMJ arthrocentesis: A literature review. Cranio. 2018 Sep;36(5):332-340. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1340226. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PMID: 28618972RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ressearcher assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
August 15, 2025
Study Completion
September 15, 2025
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It will be shared later if required for the confidentiality of the study.