Immersive Functional Virtual Reality in People With Acquired Brain Injury and Unilateral Spatial Neglect
REVINE
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a common and highly disabling condition following acquired brain injury (ABI), significantly impairing individuals' ability to perform daily activities and reducing their autonomy. It frequently affects patients who have suffered a stroke or traumatic brain injury, and it is often associated with worse functional outcomes and increased care needs. Despite advances in neurorehabilitation, conventional assessment and treatment tools for USN have shown limitations in sensitivity and ecological validity. Immersive Functional Virtual Reality (IFVR) is an emerging and promising technology that creates controlled, interactive environments, facilitating both assessment and rehabilitation in a motivating and safe way. The REVINE study explores the feasibility, usability, and preliminary clinical effects of an immersive VR-based intervention tailored to address motor and spatial deficits in adults with ABI and USN. This is a prospective, non-controlled feasibility study using a single-group interrupted time series design. Participants (N=30) will be recruited from two neurorehabilitation services in Catalonia (Spain): the Neurological Rehabilitation and Brain Injury Unit at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and the Outpatient Rehabilitation Service at Consorci Hospitalari de Vic. Eligible participants will be adults with ABI in the subacute or chronic phase, presenting USN (as measured by the Catherine Bergego Scale and the Bells Cancellation Test) and mild-to-moderate upper limb impairment. The intervention consists of 12 supervised individual IFVR sessions (30 minutes/session, 3 times/week for 4 weeks), using the KINESIX system (NeuroGroup XR Inc., Montreal, Canada). A progressive series of gamified tasks will be delivered through immersive VR, targeting spatial exploration and upper limb function, with adjustable difficulty and real-time feedback. Participants will undergo three pre-intervention and three post-intervention evaluations, spaced one month apart. Clinical outcomes include the degree of USN (measured by the Catherine Bergego Scale, the Bells Cancellation Test, and the KINESIX light-reaching test), usability (System Usability Scale), and satisfaction (User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire). Feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, adherence to treatment, session completion times, adverse events, and therapist assistance level. We hypothesize that IFVR will be a viable and well-accepted intervention, with high user satisfaction, minimal adverse effects, and measurable improvements in neglect-related outcomes. This study aims to inform the future design of larger-scale trials and support the integration of IFVR into routine neurorehabilitation settings or home-based telerehabilitation programs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2029
June 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
2.4 years
June 3, 2025
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of the immersive virtual reality intervention
Feasibility will be assessed based on: * Recruitment rate: number of participants enrolled versus eligible. * Consent rate: number of participants agreeing to participate after invitation. * Retention rate: percentage completing all planned assessments. * Adherence: number and percentage of VR sessions completed out of 12. * Adverse events: type, severity, and frequency of VR-related events. * Therapist assistance level: rated on a 7-point Likert scale from full dependence to full independence.
From enrollment to T6 (final follow-up, 5 months after baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
System Usability (System Usability Scale - SUS)
At T4 (first post-intervention evaluation, 3 months after baseline)
User Satisfaction (User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire - USEQ)
At T4 (first post-intervention evaluation, 3 months after baseline)
Change in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (Catherine Bergego Scale)
From T1 (baseline) to T6 (first post-intervention evaluation, 5 months after baseline)
Change in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (Bells Cancellation Test)
From T1 (baseline) to T6 (first post-intervention evaluation, 5 months after baseline)
Change in Spatial Reach (KINESIX Light Reach Test)
From T1 (baseline) to T6 (first post-intervention evaluation, 5 months after baseline)
Study Arms (1)
Arm 1 - Immersive Functional Virtual Reality
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 12 individual IFVR sessions (30 minutes each, 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks) using the KINESIX system. The intervention targets visuospatial attention and upper limb function through progressive, gamified exercises in a controlled virtual environment. Sessions are supervised by a physiotherapist or occupational therapist. In addition to the VR intervention, participants continue their usual care rehabilitation as prescribed at their center.
Interventions
Participants receive 12 sessions (30 minutes each, 3 per week over 4 weeks) of immersive functional virtual reality (IFVR) using the KINESIX system, a CE-certified Class I head-mounted display device. The intervention targets visuospatial attention and upper limb function through progressively challenging, gamified exercises. All sessions are supervised by a physiotherapist or occupational therapist and delivered in a safe, controlled rehabilitation setting. Participants continue receiving usual care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis of acquired brain injury (stroke or traumatic brain injury) in the subacute phase (\>7 days to 6 months) or chronic phase (\>6 months).
- Presence of unilateral spatial neglect, defined as omission of 6 or more bells on the left hemifield in the Bells Cancellation Test.
- Currently receiving care at the Outpatient Rehabilitation Service of the Consorci Hospitalari de Vic or at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, or listed in the historical patient registry of these centers.
- Presence of mild to moderate upper limb impairment, defined as a score \>29 on the Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity scale.
- Medically stable and eligible to begin a rehabilitation program.
- Willing to participate in the study and able to provide signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Delirium and/or behavioral disturbances that prevent the participant from following simple instructions.
- Severe cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score below 18, that interferes with the use of virtual reality.
- Severe visual and/or auditory impairment that prevents the use of immersive VR goggles.
- Severe language comprehension difficulties that interfere with the instructions during the intervention.
- Hypersensitivity that prevents the placement of the VR headset.
- Headache or dizziness induced by the use of VR goggles.
- History of photosensitive epilepsy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Vic - Central University of Catalonialead
- Hospital Vall d'Hebroncollaborator
- Consorci Hospitalari de Vic (CHV)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain, 08035, Spain
Consorci Hospitalari de Vic
Vic, Spain, 08500, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Hategeka C, Ruton H, Karamouzian M, Lynd LD, Law MR. Use of interrupted time series methods in the evaluation of health system quality improvement interventions: a methodological systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):e003567. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003567.
PMID: 33055094BACKGROUNDGammeri R, Iacono C, Ricci R, Salatino A. Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jan 10;16:131-152. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S171461. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32021206BACKGROUNDCorbetta M, Kincade MJ, Lewis C, Snyder AZ, Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1603-10. doi: 10.1038/nn1574. Epub 2005 Oct 23.
PMID: 16234807BACKGROUNDCavedoni S, Cipresso P, Mancuso V, Bruni F, Pedroli E. Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update. Virtual Real. 2022;26(4):1663-1704. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00648-0. Epub 2022 May 30.
PMID: 35669614BACKGROUNDBernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, Krakauer JW, Boyd LA, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Cramer SC. Agreed Definitions and a Shared Vision for New Standards in Stroke Recovery Research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):793-799. doi: 10.1177/1545968317732668.
PMID: 28934920BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Jose Antonio Merchan-Baeza, PhD
University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Josan Merchan-Baeza
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2025
First Posted
June 12, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2029
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the exploratory nature of this feasibility study and the limited sample size. Additionally, the study involves sensitive health data from individuals with acquired brain injury, and the data use has been approved only for internal analysis within the research team under strict confidentiality agreements. No extended consent for data sharing beyond the current project scope has been obtained.