Comparative Study of LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation.
Comparative Study of Working With the LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation and Improvement of Quality of Life in Adult Stroke Patients. Randomised Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of robotic technology for the treatment of gait in neurological pathologies has provided different results in scientific evidence. In patients with some types of acquired brain damage, such as stroke, the use of Lokomat® therapy can bring improvements in aspects such as gait speed and balance, among other parameters and report greater functional recovery in subacute patients with greater deterioration. Similarly, the use of another technological element such as the C-Mill® reports improvements in various aspects of ambulation and balance in gait treatments for stroke patients. Likewise, the impact on the person's recovery is not only beneficial for gait rehabilitation, but also improves the perception of well-being, which can be positive in the process of readaptation to daily life. The effect of both treatments for gait rehabilitation in adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life in the neurorehabilitation clinic will be studied. adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life at the Lescer neurorehabilitation clinic Lescer, Madrid (Spain). Participants will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 25, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2026
ExpectedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 months
November 13, 2025
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
quality of life scale
QoL39 scale. 0 minimum - 100 maximum (higher scores mean a better outcome).
12 weeks
Spasticity index
Tardieu scale 0 min - 5 max (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Lokomat
EXPERIMENTALTo compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs. stroke with the Lokomat® tool.
C-Mill
ACTIVE COMPARATORExoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of stroke (haemorrhagic and/or ischaemic) by a specialist physician. .
- Subjects who are cognitively capable and who sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination \< 24.), or impairment that prevents correct understanding of the correct understanding of the messages and explanatory orders of the treatment and its conditions.
- Diagnosis of concomitant neurological diseases and craniocerebral trauma. cranioencephalic trauma.
- Other diseases that interfere with the gait process (e.g. disabling arthritis or arthrosis, other neurological diseases, other neurological diseases).
- disabling arthritis or osteoarthritis, other concomitant neurological diseases, etc.).
- \- Contraindications of the robotic tools themselves.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37002, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Lefeber N, De Keersmaecker E, Henderix S, Michielsen M, Kerckhofs E, Swinnen E. Physiological Responses and Perceived Exertion During Robot-Assisted and Body Weight-Supported Gait After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Dec;32(12):1043-1054. doi: 10.1177/1545968318810810. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PMID: 30417724RESULTCeledova L, Krsiak M, Janku I. Immunomodulator adamantylamide dipeptide antagonizes benzodiazepine-induced rota-rod deficit in mice. Act Nerv Super (Praha). 1989 Dec;31(4):291-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 2638119RESULTPark J, Kim TH. The effects of balance and gait function on quality of life of stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(1):37-41. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182467.
PMID: 30741699RESULTCallaly EL, Ni Chroinin D, Hannon N, Sheehan O, Marnane M, Merwick A, Kelly LA, Horgan G, Williams E, Harris D, Williams D, Moore A, Dolan E, Murphy S, Kelly PJ, Duggan J, Kyne L. Falls and fractures 2 years after acute stroke: the North Dublin Population Stroke Study. Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):882-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv093. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
PMID: 26271048RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD. Physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2025
First Posted
November 17, 2025
Study Start
December 9, 2025
Primary Completion
February 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 20, 2026
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04