Hypnosis and Attention in Patients With a Neurological Disease (Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury and Multiple Sclerosis)
HYPNOVA
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This feasibility study investigates the potential of hypnosis as a complementary therapy to improve attentional deficits and fatigue in patients with neurological diseases such as stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients often experience reduced spontaneous visual exploration and impaired functional independence despite current rehabilitation methods. By integrating hypnosis with standard care, and using EEG to monitor brain activity during hypnosis and sham-hypnosis sessions, this trial aims to evaluate the practicality, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of hypnosis in enhancing attention and reducing fatigue.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Nov 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2029
December 1, 2025
November 1, 2025
3.7 years
November 20, 2025
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of the study design and procedures
The primary objective is to evaluate the feasiblity of conducting the study by assessing the recruitment process, including eligibility and consent rates, determining the participant retention rate troughout the intervention period; conducting baseline assessments, identifying reasons for participants drop-out or non-completion, exploring participant adherence to the intervention protocol and follow-up procedures.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Video-oculography during free visual exploration
Change before and after the intervention over the period of 3 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALHypnosis Intervention Participants receive hypnosis sessions designed to improve attention and reduce fatigue.
Control
SHAM COMPARATORSham Hypnosis Control Participants receive sham hypnosis sessions serving as a control condition.
Interventions
Hypnosis sessions designed to improve attentional control and reduce fatigue in patients with neurological conditions (stroke, TBI, MS). The intervention involves guided hypnotic induction and suggestions tailored to enhance cognitive focus and energy management.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ICD-10 Diagnosis of stroke, TBI or MS Admitted to the inpatient and/or outpatient in the Clinic for Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Age 18 years old or older Understanding the German language Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Psychiatric disease
- Scalp or skin conditions that interfere with EEG electrode placement (e.g. open wounds, infections, severe psoriasis) Implanted medical or neurostimulation devices that interfere with EEG electrode placement (e.g. deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, Switzerland
Related Publications (13)
Jensen MP, Barber J, Romano JM, Molton IR, Raichle KA, Osborne TL, Engel JM, Stoelb BL, Kraft GH, Patterson DR. A comparison of self-hypnosis versus progressive muscle relaxation in patients with multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Apr;57(2):198-221. doi: 10.1080/00207140802665476.
PMID: 19234967BACKGROUNDDiamond, S. G., Davis, O. C., Schaechter, J. D., & Howe, R. D. (2006). Hypnosis for rehabilitation after stroke: six case studies. Contemporary hypnosis, 23(4), 173-180.
BACKGROUNDValentine KE, Milling LS, Clark LJ, Moriarty CL. THE EFFICACY OF HYPNOSIS AS A TREATMENT FOR ANXIETY: A META-ANALYSIS. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2019 Jul-Sep;67(3):336-363. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2019.1613863.
PMID: 31251710BACKGROUNDRosendahl J, Alldredge CT, Haddenhorst A. Meta-analytic evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis for mental and somatic health issues: a 20-year perspective. Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1330238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330238. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38268815BACKGROUNDOgez D, Landry M, Caron-Trahan R, Jusseaux AE, Aubin M, Veronneau J, Fournier V, Godin N, Idrissi M, Rainville P, Richebe P. Make me more comfortable: effects of a hypnosis session on pain perception in chronic pain patients. Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 28;15:1362208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1362208. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38481624BACKGROUNDMontgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, Silverstein JH, Bovbjerg DH. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1639-45, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200206000-00052.
PMID: 12032044BACKGROUNDHersche R, Weise A, Michel G, Kesselring J, Bella SD, Barbero M, Kool J. Three-week inpatient energy management education (IEME) for persons with multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: Feasibility of a randomized clinical trial. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Oct;35:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
PMID: 31280074BACKGROUNDLefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
PMID: 31901449BACKGROUNDBode LKG, Sprenger A, Helmchen C, Hauptmann B, Munte TF, Machner B. Combined optokinetic stimulation and cueing-assisted reading therapy to treat hemispatial neglect: A randomized controlled crossover trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;66(5):101713. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101713. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
PMID: 36645965BACKGROUNDRayegani SM, Heidari S, Seyed-Nezhad M, Kiyani N, Moradi-Joo M. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in comparison with routine rehabilitation methods in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024 Sep 12;10(3):20552173241272561. doi: 10.1177/20552173241272561. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
PMID: 39290831BACKGROUNDLiu-Ambrose T, Falck RS, Dao E, Best JR, Davis JC, Bennett K, Hall PA, Hsiung GR, Middleton LE, Goldsmith CH, Graf P, Eng JJ. Effect of Exercise Training or Complex Mental and Social Activities on Cognitive Function in Adults With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236510. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36510.
PMID: 36227593BACKGROUNDAlashram AR. Computerized cognitive rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 May 10:1-10. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2350607. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 38726576BACKGROUNDChiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1139-51. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X.
PMID: 19007738BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study is a double-blind design, where both participants and outcome assessors are blinded to the intervention assignment. Participants will not know whether they are receiving hypnosis or sham hypnosis, minimizing expectancy and placebo effects. Outcome assessors who conduct attentional testing will also be blinded to group allocation to reduce assessment bias. Due to the nature of the intervention, the practitioner administering the sessions may be aware of the condition but will have no role in outcome assessment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2025
First Posted
December 1, 2025
Study Start
November 18, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2029
Last Updated
December 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11