NCT07007650

Brief Summary

With the changes in medical models and improvements in people's quality of life, parturients have higher demands for childbirth, making the alleviation and elimination of labor pain an important aspect of modern obstetrics. Intrathecal labor analgesia has been widely adopted in clinical practice to relieve pain. However, current studies mainly focus on parturients who are just beginning to receive labor analgesia, while for those experiencing prolonged analgesia, medical institutions still use traditional formulations, lacking relevant guidelines or expert consensus. In such cases, prolonged waiting and anxiety may lower the pain tolerance of parturients, leading to an increased need for higher concentrations of local anesthetics. To address this clinical gap, this study aims to explore the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in prolonged labor analgesia and has designed a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide evidence for improving the analgesic regimen for this group of parturients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 14, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Labor AnalgesiaRopivacaine ConcentrationProlonged PainMaternal-Neonatal Safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score

    The pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at four time points: T0 (at the time of pump fluid change) T1 (0.5 hours after the pump fluid change) T2 (1 hour after the pump fluid change) T3 (when full cervical dilation is achieved/in case of emergency cesarean section).

    From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Modified Bromage score

    From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

  • Mode of delivery

    At the end of delivery

  • Neonatal Apgar score

    10 minutes after the delivery of the fetus

  • nausea and vomiting questionnaire

    From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

Study Arms (2)

high concentration ropivacaine group

EXPERIMENTAL

The combination of 0.12% ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil

Drug: High-concentration Ropivacaine

Low concentration ropivacaine group.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The combination of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil

Drug: Low concentration ropivacaine group

Interventions

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

high concentration ropivacaine group

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Low concentration ropivacaine group.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsThis study is open to women who are planning a vaginal delivery and voluntarily accepting labor analgesia.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA II
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • No contraindications for epidural puncture and voluntarily accepting labor analgesia
  • Maternal participants changing the first pump fluid

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications for epidural labor analgesia
  • Serious heart, brain, liver, or kidney diseases
  • Mental abnormalities
  • Neurological diseases
  • Maternal request for management of breakthrough pain before changing the pump fluid

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chengdu Jinjiang District Women & Children Health Hospital,

Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Jian Z, Longqing R, Dayuan W, Fei J, Bo L, Gang Z, Siying Z, Yan G. Prolonged duration of epidural labour analgesia decreases the success rate of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1112-1117. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2067353.

  • Ni JX, Feng JL, Yao SJ, Ni LF, Song SB, Song CZ, Qian XW, Mei Z, Yu J. Determination of the Dose-Response Relationship of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Mar 6;16:609-618. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S346842. eCollection 2022.

  • Tan HS, Reed SE, Mehdiratta JE, Diomede OI, Landreth R, Gatta LA, Weikel D, Habib AS. Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study. Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137.

  • Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0909254. No abstract available.

Related Links

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A double-blind design is a research method aimed at eliminating bias between participants and researchers. In this design, participants are randomly assigned to different intervention groups (such as different concentrations of ropivacaine), and neither the participants nor the researchers responsible for evaluating the results are aware of the specific group allocations. This ensures the objectivity and reliability of the research findings, avoiding the influence of subjective expectations or observational biases on data interpretation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Anesthesiology Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2025

First Posted

June 6, 2025

Study Start

June 14, 2025

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 10, 2025

Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

For our study "Effects of Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine on Prolonged Labor Analgesia," we have decided not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD). This decision is due to privacy concerns, data security requirements, ethical approval limitations, legal restrictions, and the study's design which did not accommodate data sharing. We believe this aligns with ethical standards and operational capabilities.

Locations