Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Epidural Analgesia
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sixteen million babies were born in 2010, approximately half were by cesarean. Labor analgesia should be the first choice for these parturients based on the consideration of security and humanization. However this labor analgesia rate is quite low in China (\<5%) while in western country, this rate is up to 60%. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is the latest technique for labor analgesia which has less neurotoxicity theoretically compared with Continuous Epidural Infusion(CEI) with Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which is used most commonly. In that study, they reported less total local anesthetic consumption, fewer manual bolus doses and greater patient satisfaction with the PIEB technique. In China, multiple factors contribute to the reasons of low labor analgesia rate. From the patient's point of view, worrying about unsatisfied analgesia, and not adapted to the symptoms of motor block, such as inability to move their legs distressing, both are important reasons of refusing labor analgesia and preferring to cesarean delivery. Therefore, in this clinical trial, we plan to find a safer and more effective regimen for labor analgesia in Chineseparturients. This clinical trial is designed to prove PIEB used Ropivacaine is safer and more effective than CEI for labor analgesia in Chinese parturients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 28, 2016
December 1, 2016
8 months
August 11, 2016
December 27, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maternal visual analogue scale (VAS)
a visual analog scale (VAS) with a 10 cm vertical score ranged from "no pain" to "worst possible pain"
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 1 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Maternal modified Bromage scale
At time of initiation of analgesia and hourly thereafter until 2 hours postpartum (approximately 10 hours)
Subject's Satisfaction with labor epidural analgesia
At the time after childbirth
Total ropivacaine and sufentanil consumption
At two hours postpartum
Proportion of parturients requiring additional PCEA boluses
At two hours postpartum
Rate of "very satisfied"and/or "satisfied",Proportion of subjects who has experienced Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain more than 3 scale
At two hours postpartum
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
CEI
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil. The basal infusion of CEI: 10 ml/h, beginning immediately after the initial dose
PIEB 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil.The basal infusion of PIEB1: 5 ml per 30 min, beginning 30 min after the initial dose
PIEB 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial loading dose:10 ml (0.125% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil) Epidural infusion with maintain dose: 0.08% ropivacaine with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil. The basal infusion of PIEB2: 10 ml per 60 min, beginning 60 min after the initial dose
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who agree to join this study
- Age: 22y-40y
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2
- Gestation : 37-41 weeks
- Primipara
- Singleton fetus and head presentation
- In early labor: cervical dilation for 1-3cm
- Requesting labor epidural analgesia
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication for epidural analgesia
- Height less than 150 cm or more than 170 cm
- Morbid obesity (BMI more than 35)
- High-risk pregnancy:(gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, placenta previa, placental abruption, preeclampsia)
- Received parenteral opioids
- Unable to perform motor block evaluation tests
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210004, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2016
First Posted
August 19, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share