NCT06981728

Brief Summary

The aim of our study is to investigate whether the analgesic effect of MTPB is non inferior to that of TPVB in trauma patients with multiple rib fractures.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Jun 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress41%
Jun 2025Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 21, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome will be the mean difference in numeric rating pain scores (NRS) between the MTPB and TPVB groups at 24-hour after the block.

    24hour

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • • NRS scores at different times up to 24 hours.

    72hour

  • Time for first analgesic request. • Total 24 hours analgesic consumption.

    24hour

  • • Total 24 hours analgesic consumption.

    24hour

  • • Time for block performance.

    30min

  • • Dermatomal block effect.

    24hour

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

M (MTPB)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Mid-point transverse to pleura block

Procedure: Mid point transverse to pleura block

P (TPVB)

SHAM COMPARATOR

Thoracic paravertebral block

Procedure: Mid point transverse to pleura block

Interventions

TPVB and MTPB was performed at a spinal level midway between the uppermost and the lowest fractured rib, with the patient in a sitting position, and under complete aseptic conditions, a linear ultrasound probe (GE Healthcare-Logiq F6) will be placed oblique parasagittally 3 cm lateral to spinous process used to identify the transverse process, pleura, superior costotransverse ligament, and the paravertebral space at the target vertebral level. After skin and subcutaneous tissue infiltration with 2-3 mL of 2% lignocaine, an 18-gauge Touhy needle was inserted under ultrasound guidance until the needle tip reaches : * the midpoint between the transverse process and the pleura (group M). * the paravertebral space (group P). A bolus dose (0.3mL/kg) of plain bupivacaine 0.5% plus 8 mg of dexamethasone was injected after negative aspiration to blood and air.

Also known as: Thoracic paravertebral block
M (MTPB)P (TPVB)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged between 18 and 70 years, from both genders, who had uni lateral traumatic multiple rib fractures (three or more confirmed by a CT chest scan).

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant head injury/unconsciousness (GCS less than 15).
  • Patients with Pain score \>6.
  • those having significant trauma outside the chest wall, e.g., acute spine or pelvic fracture, severe traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, or abdominal visceral injuries.
  • Obese patients with body mass index ≥ 35.
  • coagulopathy.
  • History of drug allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patient refusal.
  • Local infection at the injection site.
  • Opioid addiction.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rib Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesThoracic Injuries

Study Officials

  • alaa attia, professor

    alaaguhina@aun.edu.eg

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Monira Ismail, professor

    Monira.taha77@med.suez.edu.eg

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • muhamed mamdouh, lecturer

    mamdouh372@med.aun.edu.eg

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
According to computer-generated software randomization (www.randomization.com) table into two groups of 35 each, patients randomly were allocated to Group M or Group P at a ratio of 1:1. * Group M: mid-point transverse to pleura block. * Group P: thoracic paravertebral block. The grouping sequence was put into a sealed opaque envelope, the operator opened the envelope to identify the type of block. Patients were blinded to the grouping assignments. After trial completion, all participants remained unaware of the grouping assignments until un blinding.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2025

First Posted

May 21, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 21, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05