NCT02604589

Brief Summary

Rib fractures are common injuries in accident patients and can be associated with significant pain during recovery. If poorly controlled, pain from splinting due to rib fractures can result in difficulty in breathing leading to incomplete expansion of lung, and even the need to put a patient on a ventilator to help them breathe. Therefore, pain control is critical in managing patients with rib fractures. To date, many studies have shown the effectiveness of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (a slow release of pain medications at the site of injury that prevents the transmission of pain signals). This approach has never been studied in a randomized fashion in rib fracture patients, and has never been compared to patient-controlled narcotic pain medication, commonly used at many hospitals. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the placement of an elastomeric infusion pump (a small, external, wearable balloon used to deliver medication over time) attached to a continuous infusion catheter or "soaker" catheter (a tube which releases the pain medication through tiny holes in it, right at the site of injury) to deliver local anesthetic medication to reduce pain caused by two or more rib fractures.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 12, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

November 2, 2015

Results QC Date

January 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Catheters, IndwellingInfusion PumpsAnesthesia, LocalAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledBupivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Narcotic Use

    Quantity of systemic narcotic used (hydromorphone hydrochloride, Dilaudid) averaged per day over the length of hospital stay, in mg/24 hours.

    3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Time to Improvement in Pulmonary Function

    3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days

  • Time to Improvement in Pain Intensity

    3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days

  • Morbidity

    3 days or hospital length of stay, whichever is longer

  • Mortality

    30 days

  • Hospital Length of Stay

    from randomization to discharge, usually within the range of 5-15 days

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

PCA only

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Procedure: Standard of care - Intravenous Patient Controlled Anesthesia (PCA) 0.1 mg hydromorphone hydrochloride, every 6 minutes. Boluses of 0.1 mg IV hydromorphone for uncontrolled pain up to a maximum of 2.5 mg/hr.

Drug: hydromorphone hydrochloride

Bupivicaine 0.25% (LOW DOSE)

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard PCA infusion 0.1 mg hydromorphone hydrochloride, every 6 minutes. Bolus 0.1 mg hydromorphone for uncontrolled pain up to a maximum of 2.5 mg/hr. Infusion catheter placement. Bupivacaine 0.25% 4 ml/hr total for dual chamber catheter.

Drug: hydromorphone hydrochlorideProcedure: Infusion catheter placementDrug: bupivicaine 0.25%

Bupivicaine 0.5% (HIGH DOSE)

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard PCA infusion 0.1 mg hydromorphone hydrochloride, every 6 minutes. Bolus 0.1 mg hydromorphone for uncontrolled pain up to a maximum of 2.5 mg/hr. Infusion catheter placement. Bupivacaine 0.5% 4 ml/hr total for dual chamber catheter.

Drug: hydromorphone hydrochlorideProcedure: Infusion catheter placementDrug: bupivicaine 0.5%

Interventions

Patient-controlled narcotic analgesia pump

Also known as: Dilaudid
Bupivicaine 0.25% (LOW DOSE)Bupivicaine 0.5% (HIGH DOSE)PCA only

Placement of continuous infusion catheter and elastomeric pump into extrathoracic paraspinous space

Also known as: OnQ pump placement
Bupivicaine 0.25% (LOW DOSE)Bupivicaine 0.5% (HIGH DOSE)

Low Dose analgesia

Also known as: Marciane
Bupivicaine 0.25% (LOW DOSE)

High dose analgesia

Also known as: Marcaine
Bupivicaine 0.5% (HIGH DOSE)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admission to trauma service at Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • Two or more rib fractures in an anatomic pattern feasible for nerve blockade (unilateral or bilateral)
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • Ability to comprehend and endorse an informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients intubated before placement of continuous infusion catheter
  • Any significant concomitant injuries potentially confounding for evaluation of the effectiveness of analgesia (eg., traumatic brain injury)
  • History of an allergic reaction to local anesthetic
  • Use of other regional anesthetics before evaluation (epidural or paravertebral nerve blockade)
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 2.0
  • Inability to obtain informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak

Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rib FracturesAgnosia

Interventions

HydromorphoneBupivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesThoracic InjuriesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

Study terminated early due to lack of enrollment.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rose Callahan
Organization
William Beaumont Hospital

Study Officials

  • Anthony Iacco, MD

    Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak MI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2015

First Posted

November 13, 2015

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

November 1, 2016

Study Completion

November 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 12, 2017

Results First Posted

May 12, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations