Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients
EPERC
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2026
CompletedMarch 27, 2026
August 1, 2025
2.9 years
July 18, 2020
February 14, 2026
March 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acute Pain Assessed by Numeric Pain Score
The patient will be asked to verbalize their numeric pain score on the day of hospital discharge. Pain is measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. Note: The timing of hospital discharge varies by patient as these are polytrauma patients.
Hospital discharge (up to 1 month)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
30-day Mortality
1 month after hospital discharge
Number of Participants Requiring ICU Admission
1 month after hospital discharge
Length of Hospital Stay
Up to 1 month
Use of Narcotic Equivalents
Hospital discharge (up to 1 month), 1 month, 3 months, 12 months after hospital discharge
Number of Participants With a Rib-specific Readmission Within 30 Days of Discharge
1 month after hospital discharge
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Image-guided percutaneous ICN (pICN): Group A
EXPERIMENTALPatients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are \>= 65 years of age will be randomized to percutaneous image-guided cryoneurolysis (pICN) group within 72 hours of presentation.
Standard-of Care : Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are \>= 65 years of age will be randomized to standard-of-care group within 72 hours of presentation.
Interventions
Patients will be offered a minimally invasive solution known as cryoneurolysis. By directly applying a cold cryoneurolysis probe to the nerves the axon is destroyed, resulting in Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve without distorting epineurial or perineurial tissue. Application of cryoneurolysis will help reduce the amount of narcotics the patient would need to take and instead provide them longer term pain control with minimal risk.
Patients will be provided regular standard of care at the Stanford Hospital with long-term follow-up provided at the Stanford Center for Reconstruction after Chest Wall Injury.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- i) Patients greater than 65 years with any acute rib fracture
- ii) Pain score equal to or greater than 5 with deep inspiration.
- iii) Presenting and admitted to Stanford Emergency Department
You may not qualify if:
- i) Radiographic evidence of metastasis to ribs
- ii) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13
- iii) Patients undergoing SSRF
- iv) Rib fractures located \< 3cm from spinous process
- v) Coagulopathy (INR \>1.5, Pat \< 100)
- vi) Other factors precluding cryoablation at IR attending's discretion
- vii) If only ribs broken are 1,2 or 10,11, 12
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (37)
Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):975-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018.
PMID: 7996614BACKGROUNDFlagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Santaniello JM, Gamelli RL. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):717-23; discussion 723-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.022.
PMID: 16269301BACKGROUNDSharma OP, Oswanski MF, Jolly S, Lauer SK, Dressel R, Stombaugh HA. Perils of rib fractures. Am Surg. 2008 Apr;74(4):310-4. doi: 10.1177/000313480807400406.
PMID: 18453294BACKGROUNDMarasco S, Lee G, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
PMID: 25069400BACKGROUNDFabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. Prolonged pain and disability are common after rib fractures. Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):511-5; discusssion 515-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.12.007.
PMID: 23592156BACKGROUNDGordy S, Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. The contribution of rib fractures to chronic pain and disability. Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):659-62; discussion 662-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
PMID: 24612969BACKGROUNDHolcomb JB, McMullin NR, Kozar RA, Lygas MH, Moore FA. Morbidity from rib fractures increases after age 45. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Apr;196(4):549-55. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01894-X.
PMID: 12691929BACKGROUNDStawicki SP, Grossman MD, Hoey BA, Miller DL, Reed JF 3rd. Rib fractures in the elderly: a marker of injury severity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):805-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52223.x.
PMID: 15086666BACKGROUNDBulger EM, Arneson MA, Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ. Rib fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2000 Jun;48(6):1040-6; discussion 1046-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200006000-00007.
PMID: 10866248BACKGROUNDLiman ST, Kuzucu A, Tastepe AI, Ulasan GN, Topcu S. Chest injury due to blunt trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):374-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00813-8.
PMID: 12614809BACKGROUNDVan Vledder MG, Kwakernaak V, Hagenaars T, Van Lieshout EMM, Verhofstad MHJ; South West Netherlands Trauma Region Study Group. Patterns of injury and outcomes in the elderly patient with rib fractures: a multicenter observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):575-583. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0969-9. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PMID: 29905897BACKGROUNDWitt CE, Bulger EM. Comprehensive approach to the management of the patient with multiple rib fractures: a review and introduction of a bundled rib fracture management protocol. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jan 5;2(1):e000064. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000064. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29766081BACKGROUNDTodd SR, McNally MM, Holcomb JB, Kozar RA, Kao LS, Gonzalez EA, Cocanour CS, Vercruysse GA, Lygas MH, Brasseaux BK, Moore FA. A multidisciplinary clinical pathway decreases rib fracture-associated infectious morbidity and mortality in high-risk trauma patients. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.048.
PMID: 17161098BACKGROUNDde Jong MB, Kokke MC, Hietbrink F, Leenen LP. Surgical Management of Rib Fractures: Strategies and Literature Review. Scand J Surg. 2014 Jun;103(2):120-125. doi: 10.1177/1457496914531928. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMID: 24782038BACKGROUNDShi HH, Esquivel M, Staudenmayer KL, Spain DA. Effects of mechanism of injury and patient age on outcomes in geriatric rib fracture patients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Mar 16;2(1):e000074. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000074. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29766084BACKGROUNDTignanelli CJ, Rix A, Napolitano LM, Hemmila MR, Ma S, Kummerfeld E. Association Between Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures and Mortality Rates Among US Trauma Centers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1316.
PMID: 32215632BACKGROUNDPieracci FM, Majercik S, Ali-Osman F, Ang D, Doben A, Edwards JG, French B, Gasparri M, Marasco S, Minshall C, Sarani B, Tisol W, VanBoerum DH, White TW. Consensus statement: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines. Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):307-321. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 27912931BACKGROUNDChen Zhu R, de Roulet A, Ogami T, Khariton K. Rib fixation in geriatric trauma: Mortality benefits for the most vulnerable patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jul;89(1):103-110. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002666.
PMID: 32176172BACKGROUNDKulminski AM, Ukraintseva SV, Kulminskaya IV, Arbeev KG, Land K, Yashin AI. Cumulative deficits better characterize susceptibility to death in elderly people than phenotypic frailty: lessons from the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):898-903. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01656.x. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
PMID: 18363679BACKGROUNDFarhat JS, Velanovich V, Falvo AJ, Horst HM, Swartz A, Patton JH Jr, Rubinfeld IS. Are the frail destined to fail? Frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1526-30; discussion 1530-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182542fab.
PMID: 22695416BACKGROUNDAbellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Houles M, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Soto M, Vellas B. The assessment of frailty in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 May;26(2):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.02.002.
PMID: 20497846BACKGROUNDRyb GE, Dischinger PC, Burch CA, Kerns TJ, Kufera J, Andersen D. Frailty and injury causation. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:175-81.
PMID: 23169127BACKGROUNDGalvagno SM Jr, Smith CE, Varon AJ, Hasenboehler EA, Sultan S, Shaefer G, To KB, Fox AD, Alley DE, Ditillo M, Joseph BA, Robinson BR, Haut ER. Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Trauma Anesthesiology Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5):936-951. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209.
PMID: 27533913BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581.
PMID: 27749354BACKGROUNDJanssen TL, Hosseinzoi E, Vos DI, Veen EJ, Mulder PGH, van der Holst AM, van der Laan L. The importance of increased awareness for delirium in elderly patients with rib fractures after blunt chest wall trauma: a retrospective cohort study on risk factors and outcomes. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0248-z.
PMID: 31195982BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Preciado J, Trescot AM. Novel cryoneurolysis device for the treatment of sensory and motor peripheral nerves. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1204229. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
PMID: 27333989BACKGROUNDKeller BA, Kabagambe SK, Becker JC, Chen YJ, Goodman LF, Clark-Wronski JM, Furukawa K, Stark RA, Rahm AL, Hirose S, Raff GW. Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia following pectus excavatum repair: Preliminary outcomes in twenty-six cryoablation patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;51(12):2033-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PMID: 27745867BACKGROUNDHarbaugh CM, Johnson KN, Kein CE, Jarboe MD, Hirschl RB, Geiger JD, Gadepalli SK. Comparing outcomes with thoracic epidural and intercostal nerve cryoablation after Nuss procedure. J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
PMID: 30278932BACKGROUNDVossler JD, Zhao FZ. Intercostal nerve cryoablation for control of traumatic rib fracture pain: A case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2019 Jul 31;23:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100229. eCollection 2019 Oct.
PMID: 31388539BACKGROUNDKoethe Y, Mannes AJ, Wood BJ. Image-guided nerve cryoablation for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;37(3):843-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0718-8. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PMID: 23954965BACKGROUNDByas-Smith MG, Gulati A. Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1033-5. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237290.68166.c2.
PMID: 17000825BACKGROUNDPieracci FM, Leasia K, Bauman Z, Eriksson EA, Lottenberg L, Majercik S, Powell L, Sarani B, Semon G, Thomas B, Zhao F, Dyke C, Doben AR. A multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with severe, nonflail fracture patterns (Chest Wall Injury Society NONFLAIL). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002559.
PMID: 31804414BACKGROUNDMelzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
PMID: 1235985BACKGROUNDMarasco SF, Martin K, Niggemeyer L, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Impact of rib fixation on quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2019 Jan;50(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
PMID: 30442372BACKGROUNDWilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
PMID: 9726257BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUNDLiou RJ, Earley MJ, Forrester JD. Effect of climate on surgical site infections and anticipated increases in the United States. Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 16;12(1):19698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24255-w.
PMID: 36385136DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Single-center study at an ACS Level I trauma center limits generalizability. Lack of blinding and potential placebo effect introduce bias. Only patients \>65 were included, and the prone positioning introduced bias as only healthier individuals were able to tolerate positioning. CT guidance may not reflect outcomes with other modalities. Variable treatment levels, no follow-up physical exam, subjective pain measures, and use of generic (not rib-specific) PROs further limit interpretation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Joseph Forrester
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph D Forrester, MD
Stanford University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nishita Kothary, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2020
First Posted
July 22, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 25, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Results First Posted
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share