NCT06977789

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare Holter versus S patch in a group of elderly patients who are referred to the Geriatrics service in Changi General Hospital for falls from Accident and Emergency department, clinic and wards. The investigator hope to assess the feasibility, adherence and patient acceptability as an alternative to Holter monitoring. The investigator also hope to learn if S-Patch EX monitoring system can be as effective or equivalent to Holter in the monitoring of arrhythmias and the possibility of deploying it for longer term monitoring of arrhythmias. Participants who consented to be in this study will be offered S patch and Holter consecutively. Holter will be worn for 24 hours and S patch will be worn for 72 hours. The order which Holter or S patch will be worn first will be determined via randomisation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
73

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 3, 2020

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 25, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

April 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Participant's Compliance

    An events diary and questionnaire to evaluate their preference between Holter and the S-Patch recorder. The hours of recording from both devices will also be captured in both devices report.

    From date of randomization until the day participant completed both device monitoring, assessed up to 4 days.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Device sensitivity and specificity

    72 hours for S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex and 24hours for Holter

  • Durability of the device

    72 hours for S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex and 24hours for Holter

Study Arms (2)

Group A (Holter for 24 hour follow by S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Holter for 24 hour follow by S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours

Device: S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch ExDevice: Holter

Group B (S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours follow by Holter for 24hour).

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours follow by Holter for 24hour

Device: S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch ExDevice: Holter

Interventions

S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours

Group A (Holter for 24 hour follow by S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours)Group B (S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours follow by Holter for 24hour).
HolterDEVICE

Holter for 24 hours

Group A (Holter for 24 hour follow by S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours)Group B (S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours follow by Holter for 24hour).

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 120 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 60 to 120 year old inclusive
  • Refer for Holter testing as part of clinical care
  • Participants with symptoms suspected to be due to bradyarrhythmia. This could include, but not limited to unwitnessed fall, syncope, near syncope.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who are already known to have significant bradyarrhythmia who would benefit from a permanent pacemaker.
  • Patients unable to tolerate Holter monitoring.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Changi General Hospital

Singapore, Singapore, 529889, Singapore

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BradycardiaArrhythmias, Cardiac

Interventions

Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ElectrocardiographyHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisElectrodiagnosisMonitoring, AmbulatoryMonitoring, Physiologic

Study Officials

  • Yeo Colin

    Changi General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2025

First Posted

May 18, 2025

Study Start

July 3, 2020

Primary Completion

July 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 25, 2023

Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations