Telemedicine Enabling Patients in Self-care Behaviors
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to see if monthly telemedicine computer visits (visits using the computer) improve the time it takes to identify and treat an arrhythmia. The second purpose is to see if monthly telemedicine computer visits improves the participant's understanding of the arrhythmia and improves how the participant feels with daily activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2021
CompletedSeptember 22, 2021
September 1, 2021
1.5 years
February 28, 2020
September 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time of recognition of an arrhythmia
Patient recognition of a probable arrhythmia
Up to 6 months
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia by medical staff- at what point is the diagnosis present.
Up to 6 months
Time to treatment initiation of arrhythmia
The time- what point in time is the treatment plan innitiated
Up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in self efficacy in medication use score as measured by the Medication Self Efficacy Tool (MUSE) survey
Baseline, 6 months
Change in functioning self efficacy score as measured by the 13 Item Shortened Function Self-efficacy Scale (FSES)
Baseline, 6 months
Change in self-efficacy of arrhythmia management score as measured by the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmias (ASTA) survey
Baseline, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Standard of care group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDiscuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
Telemedicine group
EXPERIMENTALDiscuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
Interventions
Visits every 6 months is standard of care.
Review details of medication indication and use, activity recommendations and changes, and knowledge of arrhythmia changes and activities which are helpful with arrhythmia changes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Read and speak English
- years of age or older
- Have a cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis
- Are willing to participate in the study and answer a pre and post survey.
You may not qualify if:
- Any difficulty in understanding the study
- Does not have internet or a cell phone data plan
- Any life threatening arrhythmias
- Objection to working with nurse practitioners and physician assistants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Related Publications (20)
Anderson, T, Bansler, J., Kensing, F. & Moll, J., Aligning concerns in telecare: Three concepts to guide the design of patient centered e-health, Computer supported cooperative work, 3 (6), 1181-1214, 2018.
BACKGROUNDDalouk K, Gandhi N, Jessel P, MacMurdy K, Zarraga IG, Lasarev M, Raitt M. Outcomes of Telemedicine Video-Conferencing Clinic Versus In-Person Clinic Follow-Up for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005217. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005217.
PMID: 28916510BACKGROUNDDixon DL, Dunn SP, Kelly MS, McLlarky TR, Brown RE. Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Amiodarone Monitoring Services on Improving Adherence to Amiodarone Monitoring Recommendations: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):230-6. doi: 10.1002/phar.1697. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
PMID: 26846446BACKGROUNDEstrada JC, Darbar D. Clinical use of and future perspectives on antiarrhythmic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;64(12):1139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0555-x. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
PMID: 18762931BACKGROUNDGoldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli GV, Olshansky B, Singh B, Collard HR, Murphy E; Practice Guidelines Sub-committee, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (HRS). A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.07.020. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
PMID: 17765636BACKGROUNDHarden M, Nystrom B, Kulich K, Carlsson J, Bengtson A, Edvardsson N. Validity and reliability of a new, short symptom rating scale in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 15;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-65.
PMID: 19604399BACKGROUNDHoneyman, E., Ding, H., Varnfield, M., & Karunanithi, M. Mobile health applications in cardiac care. Interventional cardiology, 6.2, 227-241, 2014.
BACKGROUNDKlein-Wiele O, Faghih M, Dreesen S, Urbien R, Abdelghafor M, Kara K, Schulte-Hermes M, Garmer M, Gronemeyer D, Hailer B. A novel cross-sector telemedical approach to detect arrhythmia in primary care patients with palpitations using a patient-activated event recorder. Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):422-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0033. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PMID: 27320955BACKGROUNDLamarche L, Tejpal A, Mangin D. Self-efficacy for medication management: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jul 20;12:1279-1287. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S165749. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30050290BACKGROUNDLowres N, Redfern J, Freedman SB, Orchard J, Bennett AA, Briffa T, Bauman A, Neubeck L. Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events for people with Atrial Fibrillation (CHOICE-AF): A pilot study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Feb;15(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1474515114549687. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
PMID: 25187121BACKGROUNDLopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Peiro S. Effectiveness of pacemaker tele-monitoring on quality of life, functional capacity, event detection and workload: The PONIENTE trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Nov;16(11):1188-1195. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12612. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
PMID: 26635263BACKGROUNDRyan P. Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change: background and intervention development. Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):161-70; quiz 171-2. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181a42373.
PMID: 19395894BACKGROUNDRyan P, Papanek P, Csuka ME, Brown ME, Hopkins S, Lynch S, Scheer V, Schlidt A, Yan K, Simpson P, Hoffman R; Striving to be Strong Team. Background and method of the Striving to be Strong study a RCT testing the efficacy of a m-health self-management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
PMID: 29894865BACKGROUNDSuter P, Suter WN, Johnston D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag. 2011 Apr;14(2):87-92. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0013. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
PMID: 21241182BACKGROUNDSutton, B. D'Oranzio, Gopinethannair, R. Developing a robust monitoring program in your practice: Clinical, economic, and workflow considerations. Electrophysiology Lab Digest, 13 (2), 2013.
BACKGROUNDTarakji, K. For arrhythmia patients, virtual visits hold plenty of virtues. Electrophysiology consult QD, 12 (2), 2016.
BACKGROUNDTovel H, Carmel S. Function Self-Efficacy Scale-FSES: Development, Evaluation, and Contribution to Well-Being. Res Aging. 2016 Aug;38(6):643-64. doi: 10.1177/0164027515596583. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
PMID: 26239228BACKGROUNDVarma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Love C; TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circulation. 2010 Jul 27;122(4):325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
PMID: 20625110BACKGROUNDVarma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PMID: 23211231BACKGROUNDWalfridsson, Ulla. ASTA, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweeden, 2012.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen Fasing
University of Michigan
- STUDY CHAIR
Hakan Oral, MD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Nurse Practioner
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2020
First Posted
March 5, 2020
Study Start
February 26, 2020
Primary Completion
August 10, 2021
Study Completion
September 20, 2021
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share