Bradyarrhythmia
21
2
2
12
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
92% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 37/100
4.8%
1 terminated out of 21 trials
92.3%
+5.8% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
42%
5 of 12 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 12 completed trials
Clinical Trials (21)
Conduction System Pacing International Registry (CONSPIRE)
PReventive Effect Of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus righT vEntricular paCing on All Cause deaTh, Heart Failure Progression, and Ventricular dysSYNChrony in Patients With Substantial Ventricular Pacing (PROTECT-SYNC): Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Predictive Factors of a Successful Implant of the CapsureFix MRI Model 5086
Analysis of the Acceptance and Changes to Parameters Programming Suggested by the TherapyGuide Function
Comparison of Holter vs S-Patch for Arrhythmia Detection in Older Falls Patient
ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing
Bi-ventricular Epicardial Activation in Left Bundle Area Pacing: a Comparison Study
Preliminary Research Evaluation for Ambulatory Leadless Electrocardiogram Recorder Trial
Glycopyrrolate Prophylaxis for Prevention of Bradyarrhythmia During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Myocardial Micro-damage in Relation to Active and Passive Fixation Pacemaker Electrodes
Mechanical and Electrical Dyssynchrony During His-Bundle Pacing Versus His-Bundle Area Right Ventricular Pacing
Temporary Transvenous Pacemaker Placement by Intracavitary Electrocardiogram Monitoring
The Safety and Efficacy of FFR Protocol in NTUH System
Safety and Efficacy Study of IPG Patient With Home Monitoring
COVIDAR - Arrhythmias in COVID-19
Micra Accelerometer Sensor Study 2
Left Ventricular Capture Management Study
Clinical Outcome of Pacemaker paTIents According to Pacing Modality and Primary INDications OPTI-MIND 2
Clinical Outcome of Pacemaker paTIents According to Pacing Modality and Primary INDications
Right Versus Left Apical Transvenous Pacing for Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function Study