Efficacy of Flow Ball Phonation in Professional Voice Users
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of flow ball phonation on the voice of professional voice users and elite vocal performers, both with and without functional voice disorders. Given the substantial vocal demands inherent to this population and their reliance on the voice for occupational purposes, this intervention may represent a valuable approach for the prevention and/or treatment voice disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2028
May 7, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.6 years
April 28, 2025
April 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Flexible Strobovideolaryngoscopy
Laryngeal function determined with the Voice-Vibratory Assessment with Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) rating form (Poburka et al., 2017).
baseline (before the intervention) and 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention)
Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI)
DSI: A higher index indicates a better voice quality. The index ranges from -5 to +5 for severely dysphonic to normal voices. A more negative index indicates a worse voice quality. Values \> +5 are possible in subjects with excellent vocal capacities. A DSI = +1.6 is the threshold separating normophonic from dysphonic persons.
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI)
A lower AVQI indicates a better voice quality. The index ranges from 0 to 10 for normal to severely dysphonic voices. An AVQI of 2.95 is the threshold separating normophonic from dysphonic persons.
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)
The CAPE-V will be used to provide an auditory-perceptual evaluation of the voice quality. This visual analogue scale will examine the voice based on the parameters grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain, instability, pitch and loudness.
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Voice Handicap Index
VHI: A lower index indicates less impact of the voice impairment on the quality of life. The VHI ranges from 0 to 120.
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Maximum phonation time (MPT)
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Fundamental frequency (fo)
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Jitter
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Shimmer
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Noise to Harmonics Ratio (NHR)
baseline (twice before the intervention), 3 weeks (immediately after the intervention), 3 weeks follow-up, 3 months follow-up
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Flow Ball
EXPERIMENTALStraw Phonation
EXPERIMENTALSham Intervention
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Participants receive an intensive intervention using the Flow Ball device over 3 weeks (a total of 5 hours), consisting of weekly: * 1 in-person guided session of 30 minutes * 2 guided online sessions of 15 minutes each (via teleconsult) * On the remaining 4 days of the week, participants perform independent training at home: 5 minutes, twice daily. This training is recorded using the app 'MyMedicoach'
Participants receive an intensive intervention using a straw over 3 weeks (a total of 5 hours), consisting of weekly: * 1 in-person guided session of 30 minutes * 2 guided online sessions of 15 minutes each (via teleconsult) * On the remaining 4 days of the week, participants perform independent training at home: 5 minutes, twice daily. This training is recorded using the app 'MyMedicoach'
Participants receive an intensive intervention over 3 weeks (a total of 5 hours), consisting of weekly: * 1 in-person guided session of 30 minutes * 2 guided online sessions of 15 minutes each (via teleconsult) * On the remaining 4 days of the week, participants perform independent training at home: 5 minutes, twice daily. This training is recorded using the app 'MyMedicoach' The sham intervention uses breathing exercises through the Flow Ball, no phonation will be involved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All genders
- All ethnicities
- years
- Diagnosis of a functional voice disorder
- Professional voice users
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of an organic voice disorder
- Current participation in voice therapy
- Previous phonosurgical interventions
- Pregnancy
- Smoking
- Nasal or ear diseases
- Neurological disorders
- OBJECTIVE 2: PREVENTION
- All genders
- All ethnicities
- years
- Professional voice users
- Current or previous diagnosis of a voice disorder
- Current or previous participation in voice therapy
- Previous phonosurgical interventions
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, East-Flanders, 9000, Belgium
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evelien D'haeseleer
University Ghent
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2025
First Posted
May 7, 2025
Study Start
May 8, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2028
Last Updated
May 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share