NCT06994390

Brief Summary

This project protocol investigates the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treating neuropathic pain and improving sleep quality among Brazilian military personnel. Given the high prevalence of chronic pain and sleep disturbances in this population, and the limitations of current pharmacological treatments, our randomized, triple-blinded, sham-controlled trial explores the potential of tDCS as a non-invasive therapeutic intervention. The results of this study could have a significant impact on improving the well-being and performance of military personnel, while also reducing healthcare costs associated with long-term medication use.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
47mo left

Started Mar 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress5%
Mar 2026Mar 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2029

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 29, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial current stimulationneuropathic painsleep

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pain intensity by VAS

    The primary outcome is a reduction in pain intensity by at least 30% (Dworkim et al., 2004; Farrar et al 2001). It will be assessed using the 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which consists of straight lines 100 mm long indicating "no pain" on one end and "worst possible pain or most intense pain possible" on the other (Huskisson, 1974). The VAS is scored by measuring the distance from the "no pain" end of the line. Pain intensity will be assessed daily during the 10day intervention.

    at baseline, at the end of the ten-day treatment and at follow-up, three weeks post-intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    It will be measured at baseline, at the end of the ten-day treatment and at follow-up, three weeks post-intervention.

  • Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

    at baseline, at the end of the ten-day treatment and at follow-up, three weeks post-intervention.

  • the Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue Severity (VAS-F)

    measured at baseline, at the end of the ten-day treatment and at follow-up, three weeks post-intervention.

  • Polysomnographic evaluation - time

    PSG will be measured at baseline and at the end of the ten-day treatment.

  • Polysomnographic evaluation - arousal index

    PSG will be measured at baseline and at the end of the ten-day treatment.

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Addendum for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PSQI-A)

    at baseline and at the end of 10-day treatment

  • the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21)

    at baseline and at the end of 10-day treatment

  • Sociodemografic characteristics - DOB

    at baseline

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Anodal tdcs over the primary motor (M1)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Anode placement will be positioned over M1, using the international 10-20 EEG system (C3/C4 for left or right M1). Cathode placement will be on the contralateral supraorbital area (above the eyebrow) to complete the circuit.

Device: tDCS

Anodal tdcs over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Anode placement positioned over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), using the international 10-20 EEG system (F3/F4 for left or right DLPFC). Cathode placement will be on the contralateral supraorbital area (above the eyebrow) to complete the circuit.

Device: tDCS

sham tdcs over M1 or DLPFC

SHAM COMPARATOR

The sham group will be divided in half of participants with Sham M1 and the other half as Sham DLPFC.

Device: sham intervention

Interventions

tDCSDEVICE

This group will receive single-phase direct current with an intensity of 2 mA up. Electrodes with a size of 35cm² (5 x 7 centimeters) will be used. Electrodes will be placed on the scalp, fixed with elastic bands, and immersed in 10 to 12 mL of saline solution.

Also known as: transcranial direct current stimulation
Anodal tdcs over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)Anodal tdcs over the primary motor (M1)

The device displays will be identical across active and sham groups, and to ensure blinding, an active current will be applied for 30 seconds at the beginning and end of the sham stimulation to mimic the sensation of the current ramp experienced in active stimulation. Stimulations of less than 3 minutes of tDCS do not induce cortical excitability effects, according to Nitsche and Paulus (2000), being safely inactive for the expected results.

sham tdcs over M1 or DLPFC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Military personnel (active and veterans) with chronic pain due to central or peripheral neuropathy and poor sleep quality;
  • Age over 18 years old;
  • Defined chronic NeP according to current guidelines (ICD-10 codes OR DN-4);
  • Pain with an average intensity score above 40/100 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS);
  • Medication stability (chronic pain, depression, anxiety, sleep) for at least six weeks;
  • Patients with bad sleep quality identified by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of 5 or more who do not improve under conventional treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • General contraindications for tDCS: past head trauma, current epilepsy, intracranial ferromagnetic components, pacemaker, implanted microprocessors (i.e., cochlear implants);
  • Pregnancy;
  • Known major psychiatric disorders (as assessed by the DSM-5, e.g., psychosis), history of substance abuse, or work litigation issues;
  • History of chronic refractory migraines;
  • Non-treated moderate to severe sleep apnea defined as apnea/hypopnea index greater than 15 events per hour in baseline polysomnography;
  • Skin conditions such as psoriasis or eczema that involve the scalp (Thair et al, 2017);
  • Cancer-related pain;
  • BMI \>35, due to increased reports of pain associated with increased BMI (Basem, et al., 2021; Stokes et al., 2020);
  • Patients who do not sign informed consent or do not want to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital da Polícia Militar de Goiás

Goiânia, Goiás, 74423-120, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.

    PMID: 16564618BACKGROUND
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.

    PMID: 10990547BACKGROUND
  • Mehta S, McIntyre A, Guy S, Teasell RW, Loh E. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2015 Nov;53(11):780-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.118. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

    PMID: 26193817BACKGROUND
  • Pacheco-Barrios K, Cardenas-Rojas A, Thibaut A, Costa B, Ferreira I, Caumo W, Fregni F. Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Sep;17(9):879-898. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1816168. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

    PMID: 32845195BACKGROUND
  • Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

    PMID: 11690728BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeuralgiaSleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Officials

  • Clarissa Bueno, MD, PhD

    São Paulo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Eline RF Barbosa, MD, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A triple-blinding strategy will be implemented, including participants and outcome assessors, as well as staff responsible for recruitment and statistical analysis. To ensure proper intervention, only the health professional administering the treatment will know each participant's assigned group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The intervention will be carried out into two-weeks daily consecutive sessions of 20 minutes each, with 1 session/day, and a weekend interval. Direct current stimulation will be administered through an electrical stimulator model MicroEstim Genius (NKL), Brusque, Brazil. During the session, the participants will be awake and seated in a comfortable seat. The environment will be air-conditioned, free of visual and auditory stimuli. The sessions will be conducted by a trained health professional. The groups will receive single-phase direct current with an intensity of 2 mA up, according to data presented by Pacheco-Barrios et al. (2021). Electrodes with a size of 35cm² (5 x 7 centimeters) will be used. Electrodes will be placed on the scalp, fixed with elastic bands, and immersed in 10 to 12 mL of saline solution. The electrode montage will be performed for one of two possible targets: anodal stimulation over DLPFC or anodal stimulation over M1, and also sham in both targets.
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2025

First Posted

May 29, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All individual participant data will be available, after de-identification. There will be shared the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, clinical study report, and analytic code.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
after one year of the publication of the main results (2030 March) - for 3 years.
Access Criteria
Data will be shared with researchers upon request for analyses related to the study's objectives, via a secure data repository.

Locations