Friction or Frictionless: What is the Most Effective Method for Retracting Anterior Teeth?
Lam Le Nguyên
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of the friction (sliding mechanism with elastomeric chains) and frictionless (T-loop) methods for retracting anterior teeth in Angle Class I malocclusion. Methods: This clinical intervention study examined the duration of maxillary incisor retraction from August 2022 to August 2024 in 42 adult patients who had completed canine retraction. The process involved resolving horizontal and vertical discrepancies, establishing a Class I relationship between the canines, and altering the overbite (the interproximal space between the lateral incisors and canines) until an ideal overbite index of 2 mm was achieved. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was conducted before and after retraction to evaluate alveolar changes and speed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2025
CompletedApril 15, 2025
October 1, 2024
2 years
October 15, 2024
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the effectiveness of the friction (sliding mechanism with elastomeric chains) and frictionless (T-loop) methods for retracting anterior teeth in Angle Class I malocclusion.
This interventional trial enrolled a total of 42 patients, dividing them into two age groups: group 1. Using the friction (sliding mechanism-elastomeric chains) and group 2. Using the frictionless (T-loop). For each patient, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken before and after retraction to evaluate alveolar changes. Study variables measured on CBCT. The palatal plane (PP) represents the magnetic connection between the PNS (posterior nasal spine) and the ANS (anterior nasal spine), V: a vertical reference line perpendicular to the ANS-PNS line, H: a vertical reference line parallel to the ANS-PNS line. Four lines perpendicular to the V line (L0, L1, L2, L3, 2 mm apart). Line L0 passes through the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on the buccal side. Measure the alveolar bone thickness at 3 positions (S1, S2, S3, lingual, and buccal) at T1 and T2.
6 months after enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Group 1. Using the friction
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2. Using the frictionless
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was conducted before and after retraction to evaluate alveolar changes and speed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Angle class I malocclusion on one or both sides
- Without any previous orthodontic treatment
- Indications for fixed appliances, premolar extraction to create space during treatment
- Consented to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of craniofacial traumas, anomalies, congenital defects, or systemic diseases related to osteogenic metabolisms, e.g. diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, osseous diseases
- Patients took anticoagulant drugs that affected bone metabolism (eg., for example, heparin, warfarin, NSAIDs, cyclosporine, glucocorticoids, medroxyprogesterone acetate, etc.)
- Mini screw, and hook failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Can Tho, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Related Publications (1)
Vazquez E. Saquinavir plus ritonavir reduce viral load by 99.9 percent. Posit Aware. 1996 Nov-Dec;7(6):8-9.
PMID: 11363983BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty Odonto-Stomatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2024
First Posted
April 15, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2024
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share