NCT06882018

Brief Summary

Despite efforts for initial training in neonatal resuscitation, health professionals show a decline in post-training skills, requiring continuing training. This randomized controlled pilot study will compare the feasibility and preliminary effects of two educational tools in the field, namely the traditional teaching method (instructor-assisted deliberate practice) and an educational tool developed during the research project that involves repeated peer-guided practice. Both groups will perform the same educational activity using a mobile training station equipped with the equipment necessary for the PPV. Each session will be of 30 minutes and will be repeated three times over a period of three months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 16, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Participant satisfaction with the quality of the educational methods assessed by a questionnaire

    The questionnaire uses a 1 to 4 likert scale with 1 being the highest satisfaction.

    6 months

  • Number of participants that agree to participate

    From 0 to 50, 50 being the better outcome

    6 months

  • Number of participants that terminate the study (retention rate).

    From 0 to 50, 50 being the better outcome

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean difference in performance of VPP as per the Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool (NMVCAT) score

    6 months

  • Mean difference in confidence level of participants

    6 months

  • Propensity to change behaviour score based on the CPD-REACTION questionnaire

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Repeated practice guided by peers

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention group which will use the educational tool during repeated practice guided by peers

Other: Repeated practice guided by peers

Instructor-guided deliberate practice

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A control group that will use the traditional method, instructor-guided deliberate practice

Other: Instructor-guided deliberate practice

Interventions

This approach involves repeated, peer-guided practice. Each session will involve two participants, who will support each other using the feedback grid from the first section of the "Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool" developed by DiLabio et al. (2018) to provide feedback on practicing technical skills.

Repeated practice guided by peers

In this group, practice is deliberate (PD) and is led by an instructor. Each session will be supervised by an instructor for two to four participants, and the latter will use the same feedback grid as that used in the intervention group to provide feedback.

Instructor-guided deliberate practice

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Registered or practical nurse working in neonatal intensive care at CHU Sainte-Justine
  • At least one year of experience in neonatology care at CHU Sainte-Justine
  • Completed the initial neonatal resuscitation training

You may not qualify if:

  • Neonatal transport nurses, due to their particular expertise which may introduce bias.
  • Nurse that are instructor for neonatal resuscitation training

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Sainte-Justine, Dept Neonatology

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Ahmed Moussa, MD, MMEd

    St. Justine's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Neonatalogist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2024

First Posted

March 18, 2025

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

July 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations