NCT06864260

Brief Summary

The goal of Cancer PRevention through Enhanced EnvironMenT (Cancer PREEMpT) is to test whether a comprehensive intervention that improves the neighborhood built and social environment can reduce community-level cancer risk in persistent poverty (PP) areas. Our overall hypothesis is that enhancements of the living environment (both built and social) will lower cancer risk through several mechanisms. Built environment improvements will impact walkability (through improved lighting, sidewalks, green space) and access to preventive care (through a mobile wellness van and community health workers), which will stimulate health-related behaviors (physical activity, cancer screening). These improvements will also positively impact safety (through blight removal, traffic calming), social cohesion (through opportunities for socialization), and collective efficacy (through improved neighborhood perceptions). Social environment improvements will increase social cohesion (through community-led events) and collective efficacy (through a Community Leadership Academy and community grants), which will improve public safety as well as facilitate health-related behaviors (physical activity, prevention/wellness). Both types of improvements (built and social environment) will help reduce chronic stress, which will lower the PP community's cancer risk.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
24mo left

Started May 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress50%
May 2024Apr 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2025

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2027

Expected
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2028

Last Updated

March 11, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cancerpersistent povertybuilt environmentsocial determinants of healthsocial environmentallostatic loadcollective efficacyperceived stresscancer screeningneighborhood safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Proportion of Participants with High Allostatic Load

    10 indicators that make up allostatic load (AL) score, a measure of the cumulative burden of stress. The AL score is defined as sum score of the number of biomarkers that are above the set threshold, with a high level being 3 or more biomarkers above the threshold.

    baseline, up to 3 years

  • Average Level of Perceived Stress Among Participants

    10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) which asks about the person's feelings and thoughts during the past month and their frequency (0=Never; 1=Almost Never; 2=Sometimes; 3=Fairly Often; 4=Very Often)

    baseline, up to 3 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Average Self-Reported Leisure Time Physical Activity Among Participants

    baseline, up to 3 years

  • Average Healthy Food Access among Participants

    baseline, up to 3 years

  • Cancer screening frequency among participants

    baseline, up to 3 years

  • Average Social Support among Participants

    baseline, up to 3 years

Study Arms (2)

Pre-Intervention Group

NO INTERVENTION

Baseline data will be collected on participants in this arm before community-level built and social environment modifications (intervention) are implemented.

Post-Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Post-intervention data will be collected on participants in this arm (different participants than in the pre-intervention group) after community-level built and social environment modifications (intervention) are implemented.

Other: Built EnvironmentOther: Social Environment

Interventions

Built environment modifications include sidewalks, sidewalk cuts, traffic-calming devices, crosswalks, transit improvements, green space, street trees, beautification, signage, lighting, wellness van

Post-Intervention Group

Neighborhood coalition, Community Leadership Academy (LHSA), community-led events, community health workers

Post-Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Black race
  • English speaker
  • Resident of targeted census tract

You may not qualify if:

  • Non Black race
  • Non-English speaker
  • Not a resident of targeted community

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Rodriquez EJ, Kim EN, Sumner AE, Napoles AM, Perez-Stable EJ. Allostatic Load: Importance, Markers, and Score Determination in Minority and Disparity Populations. J Urban Health. 2019 Mar;96(Suppl 1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00345-5.

    PMID: 30671711BACKGROUND
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6668417BACKGROUND
  • Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1682-91. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d.

    PMID: 16960531BACKGROUND
  • Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.

    PMID: 12900694BACKGROUND
  • Pearlin LI, Bierman A. Current Issues and Future Directions in Research into the Stress Process. In: C.S. A, J.C. P, A. B, eds. Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. Springer; 2013:325-340.

    BACKGROUND
  • Alcaraz KI, Wiedt TL, Daniels EC, Yabroff KR, Guerra CE, Wender RC. Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: A blueprint for practice, research, and policy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):31-46. doi: 10.3322/caac.21586. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

    PMID: 31661164BACKGROUND
  • Gomez SL, Shariff-Marco S, DeRouen M, Keegan TH, Yen IH, Mujahid M, Satariano WA, Glaser SL. The impact of neighborhood social and built environment factors across the cancer continuum: Current research, methodological considerations, and future directions. Cancer. 2015 Jul 15;121(14):2314-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29345. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

    PMID: 25847484BACKGROUND
  • Shariff-Marco S, Von Behren J, Reynolds P, Keegan TH, Hertz A, Kwan ML, Roh JM, Thomsen C, Kroenke CH, Ambrosone C, Kushi LH, Gomez SL. Impact of Social and Built Environment Factors on Body Size among Breast Cancer Survivors: The Pathways Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Apr;26(4):505-515. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0932. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

    PMID: 28154107BACKGROUND
  • Lynch SM, Handorf E, Sorice KA, Blackman E, Bealin L, Giri VN, Obeid E, Ragin C, Daly M. The effect of neighborhood social environment on prostate cancer development in black and white men at high risk for prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237332. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32790761BACKGROUND
  • Frank LD, Saelens BE, Powell KE, Chapman JE. Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1898-914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

    PMID: 17644231BACKGROUND
  • Obeng-Gyasi S, Tarver W, Carlos RC, Andersen BL. Allostatic load: a framework to understand breast cancer outcomes in Black women. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Jul 30;7(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00309-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34330927BACKGROUND
  • Akinyemiju T, Wilson LE, Deveaux A, Aslibekyan S, Cushman M, Gilchrist S, Safford M, Judd S, Howard V. Association of Allostatic Load with All-Cause andCancer Mortality by Race and Body Mass Index in theREGARDS Cohort. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;12(6):1695. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061695.

    PMID: 32604717BACKGROUND
  • McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Sep 27;153(18):2093-101.

    PMID: 8379800BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Interventions

Built Environment

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Environment DesignEnvironmentEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Lori B Bateman, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gabriela R Oates, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (focus groups) data will be collected to assess community-level changes in perceptions and behaviors in targeted census tracts. To measure chronic stress objectively (as a proxy for cancer risk), study staff will draw blood to measure stress biomarkers, which will include 10 indicators of allostatic load. A two-group design with independent, mutually exclusive samples pre- and post-intervention will be utilized.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2025

First Posted

March 7, 2025

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2028

Last Updated

March 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD that underlie results in a publication, after de-identification

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
From 3 months to 5 years after publication date
Access Criteria
Deidentified individual data that supports publication results will be shared beginning 3 months and up to 60 months following publication, provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UAB.

Locations