NCT06831695

Brief Summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of craniotomy and craniectomy among patients with posterior fossa lesions. The study aims to determine differences in post-operative complications, hospital stay duration, and patient recovery between the two surgical techniques.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 4, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

CraniotomyCraniectomyNeurosurgeryPosterior FossaBrain Tumors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Incidence of CSF leakage

    Definition: CSF leakage is defined as the presence of clear fluid discharge from the surgical site, confirmed via clinical examination and biochemical analysis of β-2 transferrin. Measurement: Evaluated by clinical assessment at routine follow-ups and imaging studies when indicated.

    Up to 6 months post-surgery

  • Occurrence of pseudomeningocele

    Definition: Pseudomeningocele is defined as an abnormal collection of cerebrospinal fluid in the surgical site, detected through physical examination and confirmed by imaging techniques such as MRI or CT scan. Measurement: Follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery.

    Up to 6 months post-surgery

  • Severity of post-operative headache

    Definition: Post-operative headache will be assessed using the Catalano grading system, categorizing severity from 0 (no headache) to 4 (severe, refractory to medication). Measurement: Self-reported patient evaluations at each follow-up visit.

    Immediately post-surgery, at 3 months, and at 6 months post-surgery

  • Length of hospital stay

    Definition: The total number of days a patient remains hospitalized post-surgery, including any extended stay due to complications. Measurement: Recorded from hospital admission to discharge.

    From immediate post-surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group A: Craniotomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery.

Procedure: Craniotomy

Group B: Craniectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays.

Procedure: Craniectomy

Interventions

CraniotomyPROCEDURE

Intervention: Bone flap replaced after dural closure Additional Information: This procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery.

Group A: Craniotomy
CraniectomyPROCEDURE

Intervention: Bone permanently removed Additional Information: In this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays.

Group B: Craniectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with posterior fossa lesions
  • Age range: 7-70 years
  • Patients with cerebellar hematoma (traumatic or spontaneous)

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous posterior fossa surgery
  • Brainstem hematoma
  • Tumors involving the overlying dura or bone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Interventions

Craniotomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurosurgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Dr. Birat Thapa Magar, Post Graduate Resident

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Posted

February 18, 2025

Study Start

March 4, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02