Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma
PREDICT-AEDH
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients With Cerebral Herniation Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Epidural Hematoma
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the acute epidural hematoma, there are insufficient data to support specific surgical treatment method. We aim to perform a multi-center, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral herniation undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedOctober 1, 2025
September 1, 2025
5.3 years
February 4, 2020
September 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
GOSE (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) scores
The primary outcome is indicated by the long-term functional outcomes, including overall mortality and the score on the "Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale" (GOS-E). "Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale" is the unabbreviated scale title, minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 8, which was scored as follows and higher scores mean a better outcome: 1. death; 2. persistent vegetative state; 3. lower severe disability; 4. upper severe disability (stratum 3 and 4 were considered as severe disability, with permanent requirement for help with daily living); 5. lower moderate disability; 6. upper moderate disability (stratum 5 and 6 were considered as mild disability, without a need for assistance in everyday life, that might, however, require special equipment for employment); 7. lower good recovery; 8. upper good recovery (stratum 7 and 8 were considered as good recovery).
6 months post-injury
Secondary Outcomes (7)
incidence of post-operative cerebral infarction
within 6 months post-injury
incidence of additional craniocerebral surgery
within 6 months post-injury
length of stay in hospital
within 6 months post-injury
detailed economic evaluation
within 6 months post-injury
incidence of serious adverse events
within 6 months post-injury
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Decompressive Craniectomy
EXPERIMENTALAfter the evacuation of epidural hematoma, the bone flap should not be replaced at the end of the operation.
Craniotomy
EXPERIMENTALAfter the evacuation of epidural hematoma, the bone flap must be replaced and fixed with an appropriate fixation system.
Interventions
A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. The bone flap should not be replaced at the end of the operation. DC has an advantage in controlling brain swelling, but patient is necessary to have another operation of cranioplasty to reconstruct the skull in the future.
A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. However, the bone flap must be replaced and fixed with fixation system (plates and screws). The patient will not need an additional operation to rebuild the skull in the future. But undisciplinable brain swelling and increased intracranial pressure may happen in some patients, and additional decompressive craniectomy is recommended in these cases.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clear medical history of traumatic brain injury;
- Within 12 hours after injury;
- Unilateral mydriasis or bilateral mydriasis before the operation;
- Acute supratentorial epidural hematoma and signs of brain stem compression on CT scan, representing the leading cause of operation, despite any other minor intracranial injuries associated (e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage and contusion);
- The admitting neurosurgeon considers that the epidural hematoma needs to be evacuated with a craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy.
- With informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous intracranial surgery prior to trauma;
- Patients with a score of 3 on the GCS, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis or defective coagulation, or other injuries that were deemed to be unsurvivable;
- Patients who had injury of the oculomotor nerve;
- Patients are considered to be operated mainly by following pathological change on CT: subdural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, large size infarction, et al., but not because of epidural hematoma;
- Severe pre-existing disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient is supposed to a good recovery from the TBI;
- Pregnant female.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Related Publications (5)
Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger JE; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3 Suppl):S7-15; discussion Si-iv.
PMID: 16710967BACKGROUNDLi LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Timofeev I, Corteen EA, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Sep;154(9):1555-61. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1428-8. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
PMID: 22752713BACKGROUNDLin H, Wang WH, Hu LS, Li J, Luo F, Lin JM, Huang W, Zhang MS, Zhang Y, Hu K, Zheng JX. Novel Clinical Scale for Evaluating Pre-Operative Risk of Cerebral Herniation from Traumatic Epidural Hematoma. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jun 1;33(11):1023-33. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3656. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 25393339BACKGROUNDWang WH, Hu LS, Lin H, Li J, Luo F, Huang W, Lin JM, Cai GP, Liu CC. Risk factors for post-traumatic massive cerebral infarction secondary to space-occupying epidural hematoma. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Aug 15;31(16):1444-50. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3142. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
PMID: 24773559BACKGROUNDYang C, Huang X, Feng J, Xie L, Hui J, Li W, Jiang J. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05359-6.
PMID: 34187537DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Junfeng Feng, MD
Department of Neurosurgery,Renji Hospital,School of Medicine,Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2020
First Posted
February 10, 2020
Study Start
May 23, 2020
Primary Completion
September 14, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
October 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share