RTMS for Refractory Auditory Hallucinations Based on Personalized Targets Using Magnetoencephalography
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is an before-after study in the same patient, which enrolled 36 psychiatric patients with refractory auditory hallucinations. The target of patient intervention relies on the results of magnetoencephalography localization. The medication and dosage remain unchanged during the intervention period. The investigators assume that the intervention targets for each auditory hallucination patient are individualized.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 14, 2025
December 1, 2024
1.8 years
January 26, 2025
February 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction rate of the AHRS scale
AHRS (Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale) is a scale used to assess patients' auditory hallucinations within the past 24 hours. The minimum score of the AHRS scale is 0, indicating the absence of auditory hallucination symptoms, while the maximum score represents the most severe level of symptoms. The specific numerical values need to refer to the version of the scale being used.
From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Reduction rate of the PSYRATS scale
From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.
Reduction rate of the PNASS scale
From enrolment to the end of the 2-week pseudostimulation treatment. From 2 weeks rest after the end of pseudostimulation treatment to the end of 2 weeks of true stimulation treatment.
Study Arms (1)
Physical intervention for before-after study in the same patient with auditory hallucinations
OTHERPseudo stimulus intervention in weeks 1-2, for a total of 10 days. After resting for 2 weeks, enter the 3-4 weeks of real stimulation, with 5 days of intervention per week for a total of 10 days.
Interventions
RTMS using pseudo stimulus intervention in weeks 1-2, for a total of 10 days. After resting for 2 weeks, enter the 3-4 weeks of real stimulation, with 5 days of intervention per week for a total of 10 days. Application of rTMS for 1Hz low-frequency intervention, with intervention parameters of 1400 sessions, 100% exercise threshold, and a total of 23 minutes per session. After each target intervention, rest for half an hour to one hour.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Must be able to right-handed
- Primary school education or above
- Understand and sign a written informed consent form (jointly signed by the guardian and the participant if under 18 years old)
- Existence of persistent auditory hallucinations (defined as: taking sufficient antipsychotic medication for at least 6 months, combined with 3 antipsychotic medications still ineffective, and no significant improvement in auditory hallucinations symptoms, with an AHRS score still\>12)
You may not qualify if:
- MECT treatment within the past 3 months
- Major physical illnesses (organic lesions such as sensory and motor disorders, neurological disorders, and traumatic brain injury)
- Taboo symptoms for rTMS treatment (such as intracranial metal implants)
- Aggressive behavior and an impulse to damage equipment
- Metal (including orthodontic treatment, dental implants) and tattoos inside the body
- Claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Shanghai, 200030, China
Related Publications (2)
Lynch CJ, Elbau IG, Ng TH, Wolk D, Zhu S, Ayaz A, Power JD, Zebley B, Gunning FM, Liston C. Automated optimization of TMS coil placement for personalized functional network engagement. Neuron. 2022 Oct 19;110(20):3263-3277.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
PMID: 36113473BACKGROUNDCash RFH, Weigand A, Zalesky A, Siddiqi SH, Downar J, Fitzgerald PB, Fox MD. Using Brain Imaging to Improve Spatial Targeting of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 15;90(10):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.05.033. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 32800379BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2025
First Posted
January 31, 2025
Study Start
February 5, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 10, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12