The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Ethical Decision Making and Moral Distress
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is a pre-test-post-test, randomized controlled experimental study with a control group, planned to examine the effect of motivational interviewing on ethical decision-making and moral distress levels in intensive care nurses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2025
CompletedJuly 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
1 month
January 19, 2025
July 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ethical decision making
To reveal the moral problems frequently encountered in patient care; Drawing on her experiences with ethical problems in nursing practice, she developed six dilemmas specific to nursing practice. Principled Thinking demonstrates the importance given to considering moral principles when making moral decisions in nursing. Practical thinking, on the other hand, measures the importance that nurses give to environmental factors such as the number of patients, the number of available resources, institutional policies, the extent to which nurses perceive the support of the management, and physician control, in making decisions regarding ethical issues. The ID and PD scores obtained from each dilemma are added separately to determine the participant's total ID and PD scores. The lowest ID score that can be reached in the test is 18 and the highest ID score is 66. The lowest PD score that can be achieved is 6 and the highest PD score is 36.
5 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Moral Distress
5 month
Study Arms (2)
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALParticipant Information Form, Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and Moral Distress Scale will be applied to the intervention group to be included in the study before the intervention. Then, the motivational interview program will be implemented in 5 sessions in total, one session per week. At the end of the intervention program, nurses will be asked to fill out the Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and the Moral Distress Scale.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention will be applied to the control group to be included in the study. Participants will be asked to fill out the Participant Information Form, Ethical Dilemma Test in Nursing, and Moral Distress Scale forms before and after starting the intervention simultaneously with the intervention group. will be implemented. Then, the motivational interview program will be implemented in 5 sessions in total, one session per week. At the end of the intervention program, nurses will be asked to fill out the Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and the Moral Distress Scale.
Interventions
Motivational interviewing is a directive and client-centered approach used to elicit behavioral change by helping the client explore and resolve ambivalence. Motivational interviewing is a specific method of helping individuals understand their problems and take action for change. In this study, the motivational interview program created in line with the literature (Li et al, 2023; Miller and Rollnick, 2013; Çelik Örücü, 2020) consists of 5 sessions in total, one session per week. There are specific goals and objectives for each session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nurses working in Intensive Care Clinics who volunteer to participate in the study will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Being diagnosed with any mental illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cumhuriyet University Medical Faculty Hospital
Sivas, Center, 58140, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
SEMRA SEYHAN ŞAHİN, Dr.
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- There will be no blinding.Randomization will be done to avoid bias
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- RESEARCH ASSISTANT DR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2025
First Posted
January 24, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 10, 2025
Study Completion
July 10, 2025
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share