NCT06792084

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is a pre-test-post-test, randomized controlled experimental study with a control group, planned to examine the effect of motivational interviewing on ethical decision-making and moral distress levels in intensive care nurses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

January 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ethicsmoral distressintensive care nurses

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ethical decision making

    To reveal the moral problems frequently encountered in patient care; Drawing on her experiences with ethical problems in nursing practice, she developed six dilemmas specific to nursing practice. Principled Thinking demonstrates the importance given to considering moral principles when making moral decisions in nursing. Practical thinking, on the other hand, measures the importance that nurses give to environmental factors such as the number of patients, the number of available resources, institutional policies, the extent to which nurses perceive the support of the management, and physician control, in making decisions regarding ethical issues. The ID and PD scores obtained from each dilemma are added separately to determine the participant's total ID and PD scores. The lowest ID score that can be reached in the test is 18 and the highest ID score is 66. The lowest PD score that can be achieved is 6 and the highest PD score is 36.

    5 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Moral Distress

    5 month

Study Arms (2)

intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant Information Form, Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and Moral Distress Scale will be applied to the intervention group to be included in the study before the intervention. Then, the motivational interview program will be implemented in 5 sessions in total, one session per week. At the end of the intervention program, nurses will be asked to fill out the Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and the Moral Distress Scale.

Behavioral: motivational interviewing

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

No intervention will be applied to the control group to be included in the study. Participants will be asked to fill out the Participant Information Form, Ethical Dilemma Test in Nursing, and Moral Distress Scale forms before and after starting the intervention simultaneously with the intervention group. will be implemented. Then, the motivational interview program will be implemented in 5 sessions in total, one session per week. At the end of the intervention program, nurses will be asked to fill out the Nursing Ethical Dilemma Test and the Moral Distress Scale.

Interventions

Motivational interviewing is a directive and client-centered approach used to elicit behavioral change by helping the client explore and resolve ambivalence. Motivational interviewing is a specific method of helping individuals understand their problems and take action for change. In this study, the motivational interview program created in line with the literature (Li et al, 2023; Miller and Rollnick, 2013; Çelik Örücü, 2020) consists of 5 sessions in total, one session per week. There are specific goals and objectives for each session.

intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Nurses working in Intensive Care Clinics who volunteer to participate in the study will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Being diagnosed with any mental illness

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cumhuriyet University Medical Faculty Hospital

Sivas, Center, 58140, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Motivational Interviewing

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingCounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • SEMRA SEYHAN ŞAHİN, Dr.

    Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
There will be no blinding.Randomization will be done to avoid bias
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: It is a pretest-posttest, randomized controlled experimental study with a control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
RESEARCH ASSISTANT DR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2025

First Posted

January 24, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 10, 2025

Study Completion

July 10, 2025

Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations