Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Setting Based on Evolutionary Algorithms
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Main objective: Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T. Secondary objectives: Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings
- for speech recognition in quiet
- for subjective auditory spatial perception
- for subjective auditory and musical perception
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2028
May 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 years
December 5, 2024
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Speech recognition in noise
HINT-5 min test. Noise level: 60 dB SPL. Speech level: adaptive with the answers of the participant. Result: speech-to-noise ratio (speech reception threshold, SRT50) for 50% of intelligibility in noise. Test with EAFS4T and with FS4T.
6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Speech recognition in quiet
6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Subjective auditory spatial perception
at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Subjective assessment of auditory perception
at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Subjective assessment of musical perception
at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Study Arms (1)
EA arm
OTHERat 6 month post-activation: evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting FS4T to give EAFS4T fitting. Participant wears EAFS4T during 6 weeks.
Interventions
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient (\>= 18 years old) speaking French
- Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation
You may not qualify if:
- retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU
Dijon, 21000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexis BOZORG GRAYELI, Pr
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2024
First Posted
December 17, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2028
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share