Comparison in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects of a Tonotopy-based Bimodal Fitting With or Without Synchronization
Comparison of a Bimodal Fitting With Synchronization and a Conventional Bimodal Fitting in Newly Implanted Cochlear Patient. Prospective Monocentric Randomized Double-blind Crossover Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Main objective: For a bimodal fitting (hearing aid (HA) + cochlear implant (CI)): Comparison of a tonotopy based fitting strategy with synchronization between HA and CI (ABFS) to a tonotopy based fitting strategy without synchronization (ABFnoS) for the accuracy of sound localization. Secondary objectives: Comparison of ABFS to ABFnoS for the bias of sound localization. Comparison of ABFS to ABFnoS for speech perception in noise. Comparison of ABFS to ABFnoS for the auditory skills experienced by the subject.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2026
January 14, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.2 years
June 2, 2023
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of sound localization
The accuracy of sound localization will be achieved with a sound localization test in the horizontal plane with 7 loudspeakers (HP) spaced 30° apart and arranged in a ½ circle from -90° to +90° at 1m around the patient.
at 6 weeks post-activation
Accuracy of sound localization
The accuracy of sound localization will be achieved with a sound localization test in the horizontal plane with 7 loudspeakers (HP) spaced 30° apart and arranged in a ½ circle from -90° to +90° at 1m around the patient.
at 12 weeks post-activation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Bias of sound localization
at 6 weeks post-activation
Bias of sound localization
at 12 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in noise
at 6 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in noise
at 12 weeks post-activation
Auditory skills experienced by the patient
at 6 weeks post-activation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ABFnoS then ABFS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCochlear Implant with ABFnoS first during 6 weeks then with ABFS during 6 weeks
ABFS then ABFnoS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCochlear Implant with ABFS first during 6 weeks then with ABFnoS during 6 weeks
Interventions
Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting without synchronization with the contralateral hearing-aid then with synchronization with the contralateral hearing-aid
Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting with synchronization with the contralateral hearing-aid then without synchronization with the contralateral hearing-aid
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient (\>= 18 years old) speaking French
- Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation
- Total hearing loss for less than 5 years
You may not qualify if:
- retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
- patient with residual hearing \< 70 dB hearing level (HL) at 250 Hz and 500 Hz and \< 80 dB HL at 1000 Hz on the contralateral ear
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Nice
Nice, 06103, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas Guevara, Pr
Nice University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind study: The patient and the investigator don't know the fitting.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2023
First Posted
June 12, 2023
Study Start
October 17, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2026
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share