Comparison in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects of a Tonotopy-based Fitting With or Without Fine Structure Coding
Comparison of Speech Understanding and Melodic Perception of Two Tonotopic Fitting Modalities With or Without Fine Structure in Newly Implanted Cochlear Patients: Randomized Double-blind Crossover Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Brief Summary: Main objective: Comparison of a tonotopy based fitting strategy (TFS) with fine structure coding to a tonotopy based fitting strategy without fine structure coding (TnoFS) for speech perception in noise. Secondary objectives: Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the perception of musical elements (contour test). Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for speech perception in quiet Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the qualitative preference for the listening of musical pieces. Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the melodic recognition
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedApril 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.6 years
February 22, 2023
April 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Speech recognition in noise
The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 20 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%). Signal-noise-ratios of 9, 6, 3 and 0 dB will be tested with speech at 65 dB SPL.
at 6 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in noise
The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 20 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%). Signal-noise-ratios of 9, 6, 3 and 0 dB will be tested with speech at 65 dB SPL.
at 12 weeks post-activation
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Speech recognition in quiet
at 6 weeks post-activation
Speech recognition in quiet
at 12 weeks post-activation
Melodic contour test
at 6 weeks post-activation
Melodic contour test
at 12 weeks post-activation
Qualitative measure of music
at 6 weeks post-activation
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TnoFS then TFS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCochlear Implant with TnoFS first during 6 weeks then with TFS during 6 weeks
TFS then TnoFS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCochlear Implant with TFS first during 6 weeks then with TnoFS during 6 weeks
Interventions
Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting without fine structure coding then with fine structure coding
Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting with fine structure coding then without fine structure coding
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient (\>= 18 years old) speaking French
- Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation
- Total hearing loss for less than 5 years
You may not qualify if:
- retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
- patient with residual hearing \< 60 dB HL at 250 Hz and \< 80 dB HL at 500 Hz
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gwenaelle Creff, Dr
Rennes University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind study: the patient and the investigator don't know the fitting.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2023
First Posted
March 6, 2023
Study Start
April 15, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share