NCT05754918

Brief Summary

Brief Summary: Main objective: Comparison of a tonotopy based fitting strategy (TFS) with fine structure coding to a tonotopy based fitting strategy without fine structure coding (TnoFS) for speech perception in noise. Secondary objectives: Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the perception of musical elements (contour test). Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for speech perception in quiet Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the qualitative preference for the listening of musical pieces. Comparison of TFS to TnoFS for the melodic recognition

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2023

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

cochlear implant strategytonotopy-based fittingfine structure coding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Speech recognition in noise

    The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 20 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%). Signal-noise-ratios of 9, 6, 3 and 0 dB will be tested with speech at 65 dB SPL.

    at 6 weeks post-activation

  • Speech recognition in noise

    The speech recognition in noise is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 20 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%). Signal-noise-ratios of 9, 6, 3 and 0 dB will be tested with speech at 65 dB SPL.

    at 12 weeks post-activation

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Speech recognition in quiet

    at 6 weeks post-activation

  • Speech recognition in quiet

    at 12 weeks post-activation

  • Melodic contour test

    at 6 weeks post-activation

  • Melodic contour test

    at 12 weeks post-activation

  • Qualitative measure of music

    at 6 weeks post-activation

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

TnoFS then TFS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cochlear Implant with TnoFS first during 6 weeks then with TFS during 6 weeks

Device: TnoFs then TFS (Cochlear implant)

TFS then TnoFS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cochlear Implant with TFS first during 6 weeks then with TnoFS during 6 weeks

Device: TFS then TnoFS (Cochlear implant)

Interventions

Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting without fine structure coding then with fine structure coding

TnoFS then TFS

Cochlear implant with tonotopy-based fitting with fine structure coding then without fine structure coding

TFS then TnoFS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patient (\>= 18 years old) speaking French
  • Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation
  • Total hearing loss for less than 5 years

You may not qualify if:

  • retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
  • patient with residual hearing \< 60 dB HL at 250 Hz and \< 80 dB HL at 500 Hz

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Rennes

Rennes, 35000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Interventions

Cochlear Implants

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing LossHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neural ProsthesesImplantable NeurostimulatorsElectrodes, ImplantedElectrodesElectrical Equipment and SuppliesEquipment and SuppliesProstheses and ImplantsHearing AidsSensory Aids

Study Officials

  • Gwenaelle Creff, Dr

    Rennes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Double blind study: the patient and the investigator don't know the fitting.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Two arms A and B: Arm A: patient's fitting with tonotopy-based fitting without fine structure coding (TnoFS) --\> 6 weeks use --\> tests and patient's fitting with tonotopy-based fitting with fine structure coding (TFS) --\> 6 weeks use --\> tests; Arm B: patient's fitting with TFS --\> 6 weeks use --\> tests and patient's fitting with TnoFS --\> 6 weeks use --\> tests
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2023

First Posted

March 6, 2023

Study Start

April 15, 2023

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

April 1, 2025

Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations