NCT06722768

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate various gait parameters by a sensor-embedded smart insole before and after the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the CSF tap test enhance gait and balance parameters in participants?
  • Does the CSF tap test enhance cognitive and urinary symptoms in participants? Researchers will compare pre- and post-CSF tap test gait and balance parameters by a sensor-embedded smart insole. Participants will:
  • Participate in physical function assessments including the 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go test, and Berg Balance Scale wearing sensor-embedded smart insoles before and after the CSF tap test.
  • Complete survey about cognitive and unary symptoms before and after the CSF tap test.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2021

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 9, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

gait analysissmart insoleCerebrospinal fluid tap test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Timed up and go test (TUG)

    Researchers ask patients to rise from a seated position, walk a distance of 3 m, turn around, return to the chair, and sit back. The average time of three trials was recorded as a result.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • 10 meter walk test (10MWT)

    Patients are instructed to walk 14 m, including 2 m at both ends for acceleration and deceleration, at their comfortable speed. Gait speed was calculated by dividing the 10m distance by the time taken.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Berg balance scale (BBS)

    Patients are asked to perform 14 tasks regarding the static and dynamic balance of patients. Each task was rated on a five-point scale from 0 to 4, with a total score of 56.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Total steps of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording total steps.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Cadence of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording steps per minute.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Velocity of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording gait speed (km/h).

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Stride length of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording stride length (m).

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Stride time of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording stride time (s).

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Swing phase rate of walking

    Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole, recording swing phase rate (%).

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Mean peak pressure

    The insole raw data stream was analyzed as following process. Pressure sensor measured foot pressure 40 times per second as relative values (0∼1,023). We obtained periodic foot pressure graphs for each foot region. From these graphs, mean peak pressure were determined by splitting the graph for each step, identifying the maximum pressure value in each step, and averaging the peak pressure values. The relative pressure values were subsequently converted into kilopascals using a validated algorithm with the conversion formula.

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Korean Mini-Mental State Examination

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

  • International Prostate Symptom Score

    This session will be performed at baseline and at end-point. A baseline assessment will be conducted within 24 hours before the CSF tap test, and an end-point assessment will be conducted within 24 hours after the CSF tap test.

Study Arms (2)

Responder group

Patients with iNPH were divided into responder group and non-responder group after CSF tap test. The responder group consists of patients who underwent the tap test and exhibited improvements in gait and balance, including increased gait speed as measured by the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), reduced time on the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), and resolution of shuffling, magnetic, and wide-based gait patterns. Classification were done by a multidisciplinary team including physiatrist, neurologist, and neurosurgeon. Surgical treatment was carefully considered for the responder group. Patients who declined surgery or were considered at high risk for surgical complications due to advanced age or comorbidities were excluded. Patients who were able to get an operation primarily underwent shunt surgery. Additional gait and balance analyses were performed on patients who underwent surgery within 24 hours after their last operation.

Non-Responder group

Patients with iNPH were divided into responder group and non-responder group after CSF tap test. The non-responder group consists of patients who underwent the tap test but did not exhibit improvements in gait or balance. Classification were done by a multidisciplinary team including physiatrist, neurologist, and neurosurgeon. Surgical treatment was not considered for the responder group.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Single general hospital

You may qualify if:

  • individuals who have more than 1 symptom in the clinical triad including gradually developed gait disturbances mainly showing shuffling, magnetic, wide based gait
  • individuals who assessed a standardized cranial MRI scan and those with an Evans ratio greater than 0.30 were included in the study (Microvascular lesions in the white matter were accepted only if they were mild.)
  • individuals who voluntarily agree to participate in the study and sign a consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • individuals with history of hemorrhage
  • individuals unable to walk independently on flat ground for 10 meters
  • individuals with clinically significant disorders in the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory, or endocrine systems
  • individuals considered clinically unsuitable for the trial by the trial manager or person in charge based on significant medical findings

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yongin Severance Hospital

Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Shprecher D, Schwalb J, Kurlan R. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008 Sep;8(5):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s11910-008-0058-2.

    PMID: 18713572BACKGROUND
  • Kiefer M, Unterberg A. The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Jan;109(1-2):15-25; quiz 26. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0015. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

    PMID: 22282714BACKGROUND
  • Halperin JJ, Kurlan R, Schwalb JM, Cusimano MD, Gronseth G, Gloss D. Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2015 Dec 8;85(23):2063-71. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002193.

    PMID: 26644048BACKGROUND
  • Dias SF, Graf C, Jehli E, Oertel MF, Mahler J, Schmid Daners M, Stieglitz LH. Gait pattern analysis in the home environment as a key factor for the reliable assessment of shunt responsiveness in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1126298. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1126298. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37082443BACKGROUND
  • Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drucke H, Johnk K, Diercks C, Palmie S, Mehdorn HM, Illert M, Deuschl G. Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus--which parameters respond to the CSF tap test? Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Sep;111(9):1678-86. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00362-x.

    PMID: 10964082BACKGROUND
  • Jang CW, Park K, Paek MC, Jee S, Park JH. Validation of the Short Physical Performance Battery via Plantar Pressure Analysis Using Commercial Smart Insoles. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 11;23(24):9757. doi: 10.3390/s23249757.

    PMID: 38139603BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HydrocephalusBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Na Young Kim, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Seung Ick Choi

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2024

First Posted

December 9, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 1, 2025

Study Completion

February 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations