NCT06681649

Brief Summary

\~80% of ICU survivors experience profound long-term cognitive, physical, and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Caregivers additionally experience similar detrimental psychosocial effects following discharge. Despite this knowledge, follow-up care is almost non-existent. ICU follow-up clinics may mitigate these long-term impacts, but lack evaluation of their effectiveness. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of ICU follow-up clinics vs. standard-of-care in improving qualitative/clinical outcomes of ICU survivors and caregivers, with those receiving follow-up care hypothesized to have improved outcomes.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 28, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

critical illnessdeliriumpost-intensive care syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Feasibility - Consent Rate

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measure: Consent rate, measured as the proportion of eligible population who consent to participate

    6 months

  • Feasibility - Enrolment Rate

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures: Enrolment rate, measured as the proportion of consented participants who are randomized

    6 months

  • Feasibility - Follow-Up Rate

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures: Follow-up rate, measured as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete follow-up visits at 1-, 3-, and 6-months

    6 months

  • Feasibility - Data Capture Rate

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures: Data capture rate, measured as the percentage of data elements acquired at each study time point

    6 months

  • Feasibility - Rate of adverse events

    To determine the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT evaluating the impact of a post-ICU follow-up clinic intervention on clinical and qualitative patient and caregiver outcomes, as assessed via the following measures: Rate of adverse events, assessed using the number of hospital and ICU readmissions, as well as the number of visits to the emergency department at 6 months.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Qualitative impact of intervention

    6 months

  • Process evaluation

    6 months

Other Outcomes (14)

  • Neurocognition

    6 months

  • Weight and BMI

    6 months

  • Clinical Outcome

    6 months

  • +11 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group will receive follow-up care through the specialized post-ICU follow-up clinic at KHSC at approximately 1- and 3-months following ICU discharge. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in the follow-up clinic along with the ICU survivor participant. In addition to receiving specialized follow-up clinical care, ICU survivor participants and their caregivers will also receive the following additional items as part of a bundled care intervention program (see Appendix): * Informational pamphlet on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge * Flyer on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge (brief version, which may be placed on the participant's refrigerator or other location at home as a consistent reminder) * Diaries in which the healthcare team, family members, and the patient themselves are able to journal their experiences, updates, progress, and barriers in the ICU and following discharge

Behavioral: Intervention

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive generalized standard of care follow-up through their primary care provider. This follow-up is highly variable depending on the patient and their primary care provider.

Interventions

InterventionBEHAVIORAL

The intervention group will receive follow-up care through the specialized post-ICU follow-up clinic at KHSC at approximately 1- and 3-months following ICU discharge. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in the follow-up clinic along with the ICU survivor participant. In addition to receiving specialized follow-up clinical care, ICU survivor participants and their caregivers will also receive the following additional items as part of a bundled care intervention program (see Appendix): * Informational pamphlet on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge * Flyer on critical illness and expectations following ICU discharge (brief version, which may be placed on the participant's refrigerator or other location at home as a consistent reminder) * Diaries in which the healthcare team, family members, and the patient themselves are able to journal their experiences, updates, progress, and barriers in the ICU and following discharge

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (age greater than or equal to 18 years)
  • Life expectancy greater than or equal to 6 months as determined by the attending physician
  • High risk for long-term functional sequelae following ICU discharge, defined as ICU stay greater than or equal to 4 days, or involving at least one of:
  • mechanical ventilation (any, i.e., invasive or non-invasive)
  • tracheostomy
  • delirium (defined as Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) positive or documented history of delirium in the patient's medical record by the clinical care team at some point during their ICU admission)
  • lack of access to a primary care physician for clinical follow-up
  • access to email or mail to complete follow-up questionnaires
  • presence of an informal caregiver
  • Informal caregiver (e.g., spouse, offspring) for ICU survivor as defined above
  • Adult (age greater than or equal to 18 years)

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological or communication difficulties which would preclude completion of follow-up assessments or participation in focus groups
  • Inability to speak or read English (required for completion of standardized questionnaires, clinical assessments, and for participation in focus groups)
  • Failure to provide consent/failure to have consent provided by a substitute decision maker

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Queen's University

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Jawa NA, Maslove DM, Sibley S, Muscedere J, Hunt M, Hanley M, Boyd T, Westphal R, Mathur S, Fakolade A, Tryon M, Boyd JG. IMPACT-ICU feasibility study: pragmatic mixed-methods randomised controlled trial of a follow-up care intervention for survivors of critical illness and caregivers. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e086799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086799.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessDeliriumpostintensive care syndrome

Interventions

Methods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsConfusionNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Natasha A Jawa, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2024

First Posted

November 8, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations