NCT06781801

Brief Summary

Background Cardiometabolic conditions-including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity-are highly prevalent among individuals with psychotic disorders. These conditions contribute substantially to reduced life expectancy, diminished quality of life, and increased societal and economic burdens. Thus, effective, individualized interventions are urgently needed. Outpatient psychiatric clinics offer an ideal setting for such efforts owing to regular patient contact and access to multidisciplinary care. We have developed a comprehensive, clinically integrated trial aimed at improving cardiometabolic health, promoting healthier lifestyles, and enhancing quality of life for individuals with psychotic disorders receiving care in the Greater Gothenburg region. Methods LAGOM is a multicenter, naturalistic, quasi-experimental case-control trial conducted across six geographically separate outpatient psychosis clinics within the Department of Psychotic Disorders at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, a multi-site university hospital in the Greater Gothenburg region. A total of 650 adults with psychotic disorders will be recruited from these clinics. Two clinics will implement the LAGOM intervention, whereas four will serve as control sites delivering usual care. The intervention is embedded within routine psychiatric care and grounded in behavioral science. It includes comprehensive cardiometabolic risk assessments, two visual motivational tools (QRISK3 and a body composition analyzer), personalized follow-up plans, risk-oriented referrals to primary care, and structured education for patients, relatives, and staff. The intervention is designed to be scalable, sustainable, and tailored to individual patient needs. Discussion If proven superior to usual care, this pragmatic, multicomponent intervention-delivered within routine psychiatric care-could improve cardiometabolic health and quality of life for individuals with psychotic disorders. Embedding the intervention within existing clinical structures enhances its scalability and feasibility and, if effective, could serve as a model for wider implementation.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
650

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Feb 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress33%
Feb 2025Dec 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 17, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 27, 2025

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

August 11, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

January 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Psychotic disordersQuality of lifeCost-effectivenessCardiometabolic risk factorsCardiovascular disease preventionMetabolic syndromePragmatic clinical trialIntegrated health careMulticomponent interventionBehavior change intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk based on the SCORE2 algorithm

    Whether the intervention is superior to usual care in reducing the estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk, assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. Primary endpoint: The difference between the intervention and control groups in the mean change in estimated absolute cardiovascular risk, as assessed using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), a tool designed to estimate the 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in individuals aged 40-89 years. SCORE2 ranges from a minimum value of 0% (indicating no risk) to a maximum value of 100% (indicating certainty of an event). Higher scores represent a worse outcome, as they reflect an increased likelihood of experiencing a cardiovascular event within the specified timeframe.

    At 12 months from baseline.

  • Estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk based on the SCORE2 algorithm

    Whether the intervention is superior to usual care in reducing the estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk, assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. Primary endpoint: The difference between the intervention and control groups in the mean change in estimated absolute cardiovascular risk, as assessed using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), a tool designed to estimate the 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in individuals aged 40-89 years. SCORE2 ranges from a minimum value of 0% (indicating no risk) to a maximum value of 100% (indicating certainty of an event). Higher scores represent a worse outcome, as they reflect an increased likelihood of experiencing a cardiovascular event within the specified timeframe.

    At 24 months from baseline.

  • Estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk based on the SCORE2 algorithm

    Whether the intervention is superior to usual care in reducing the estimated absolute ten-year cardiovascular risk, assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. Primary endpoint: The difference between the intervention and control groups in the mean change in estimated absolute cardiovascular risk, as assessed using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), a tool designed to estimate the 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in individuals aged 40-89 years. SCORE2 ranges from a minimum value of 0% (indicating no risk) to a maximum value of 100% (indicating certainty of an event). Higher scores represent a worse outcome, as they reflect an increased likelihood of experiencing a cardiovascular event within the specified timeframe.

    At 36 months from baseline.

Secondary Outcomes (63)

  • Change in body mass index

    At 12 months from baseline.

  • Change in body mass index

    At 24 months from baseline.

  • Change in body mass index

    At 36 months from baseline.

  • Change in waist-hip ratio

    At 12 months from baseline.

  • Change in waist-hip ratio

    At 24 months from baseline.

  • +58 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Requirements for achieving a change in targeted lifestyle

    At 12 months from baseline.

  • Requirements for achieving a change in targeted lifestyle

    At 24 months from baseline.

  • Requirements for achieving a change in targeted lifestyle

    At 36 months from baseline.

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control clinics (usual care)

NO INTERVENTION

The "usual care" model in Gothenburg includes annual health checks for individuals with psychotic disorders. Patients attend two 60-minute visits for assessments such as blood tests, blood pressure, and weight checks, with results evaluated using standard benchmarks or risk algorithms like SCORE2. Physicians may suggest referrals to primary care or recommend lifestyle changes, including diet, exercise, or substance use adjustments. Identified issues may prompt simple advice or referrals to health promoters for support with smoking cessation, dietary guidance, or group activities. The 36 ± 6-month clinical trial standardizes data collection at four outpatient clinics without altering care. Eligible patients sign consent, with rescreening allowed if a patient meets the exclusion criteria at one annual check but not at the next. Non-participants continue with regular care.

Intervention Clinics

EXPERIMENTAL

The annual health checks for the intervention group follow the same structure of two visits as in routine care as usual, with the primary difference being the content of the visits.

Other: Intervention

Interventions

The intervention group follows a structured flowchart for annual health check-ups, focusing on assessing the cardiometabolic profile, considering sex and ethnicity. This assessment includes tracking changes in cardiometabolic parameters, alongside overall cardiometabolic risk using SCORE2 and if the criteria for metabolic syndrome are met. Lifestyle habits are evaluated based on health status, illness, and benefits of quitting unhealthy behaviors. Education sessions educate participants and families on the link between psychotic disorders, lifestyle choices, and cardiometabolic health. Gradual lifestyle changes are tailored to individual needs, addressing stress and cognitive challenges, and follow national health guidelines with personalized advice and motivational tools. Regular follow-ups assess progress, while motivational tools "body composition analyzer and QRISK3" enhance engagement. Contact with internal and external resources is based on the assessment and motivational work.

Intervention Clinics

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults ≥18 years of age meeting the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria for any one of the schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F20-F25 or F28-F29)
  • Ability to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Having an electrical medical implant such as a pacemaker or other mechanical implants
  • Pregnancy
  • Deemed unsuitable by the investigator: A person may be deemed unsuitable for participation if circumstances prevent safe or reliable participation in the trial. Examples include inability or unwillingness to maintain contact with the clinic (e.g., absence of a stable address or telephone number), planned relocation or transfer to another treatment facility, municipality, or country during the trial period, mobility limitations or other practical barriers preventing attendance at clinic visits, or administrative restrictions preventing appropriate documentation in medical records or trial databases (e.g., protected or anonymous identity status). Such decisions are made on an individual basis in consultation with the clinical team (case manager (CM), treating psychiatrist, and site principal investigator (PI)) to ensure patient safety and trial integrity.
  • Currently under compulsory care.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Psykosmottagning Centrum

Gothenburg, 411 13, Sweden

RECRUITING

Psykosmottagning Nordost

Gothenburg, 415 05, Sweden

RECRUITING

Psykosmottagning Öster

Gothenburg, 416 72, Sweden

RECRUITING

Psykosmottagning Hisingen

Gothenburg, 417 52, Sweden

RECRUITING

Psykosmottagning Väster

Gothenburg, 421 48, Sweden

RECRUITING

Psykosmottagning Mölndal

Mölndal, 431 35, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Najar H, Jedenius E, Froberg A, Olofsson A, Holmbom C, Bjorlin CK, Hagberg C, Saari-Bladmyr E, Hantelius E, Walinder E, Andreasson E, Gustafsson J, Lundin L, Klysing L, Rundqvist L, Korvek N, Rydell P, Heder S, Zeebari Z, Holmberg C. Multicenter, cluster-based, superiority trial of a multicomponent lifestyle intervention versus usual care for reducing cardiometabolic risk in individuals with psychotic disorders over 36 months: the LAGOM protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2026 Jun 23;26(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12888-026-08315-3.

    PMID: 42337535BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychotic DisordersMetabolic Syndrome

Interventions

Methods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental DisordersInsulin ResistanceHyperinsulinismGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Hemen Najar, M.D., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a longitudinal, multicenter, naturalistic, multicomponent, parallel-group, quasi-experimental cluster-based trial with a superiority framework. The trial uses a case-control clinical design with a 1:3 allocation ratio, assigning one participant at the intervention clinics for every three at the control clinics. Clusters are defined at the level of outpatient clinics, with two intervention clinics and four control clinics.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2025

First Posted

January 17, 2025

Study Start

February 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

August 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

In accordance with the trial's CIP, individual participant data from this trial are not publicly available due to privacy and data protection regulations. All data are handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (EU 2016/679; GDPR) and relevant Swedish legislation, and are stored securely at Region Västra Götaland. Participants in the trial are coded with a specific record ID.

Locations