Comparing Myopia Control Efficacy in Children With 4 Methods: Orthokeratology, DIMS, DISK, and SVS.
A Comparison of Myopia Control Efficacy in Children With Orthokeratology, Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segment (DIMS) Spectacles, Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISK) Lenses, and Single-vision Spectacles for 12 Months
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if 3 optical interventions(DIMS, DISC and orthokeratology) to control myopia have different efficacy to slow myopia progression in children when the control is single focus spectacles(SVS). It will also learn about the safety of all 4 interventions. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does orthokeratology slows the progressing myopia more significant than the DIMS or DISK? What medical problems do participants have when taking orthokeratology, DIMS and DISK? Researchers will compare all the 3 interventions to a placebo (SVS) to see if 3 interventions has significant difference in slow the axial length elongation as well as the refraction changes. Participants will: Take orthokeratology, DIMS, DISK or SVS every day for 12 months Visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups and tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2031
October 23, 2024
October 1, 2024
8.2 years
October 16, 2024
October 21, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of axial length for 12-month (mm)
The ocular axial length change at follow-up of 12-month from baseline with IOLmaster 500(IOLMaster 500, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) in the unit of millimetre
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Changes of Spherical Equivalence Refraction (D)
12 months
Dropout rate (%)
12 months
Changes of ocular axial length at follow-up of 3 months (mm)
3 months
Changes of ocular axial length at follow-up of 6 months (mm)
6 months
Changes of ocular axial length at follow-up of 9 months (mm)
9 months
Study Arms (4)
Orthokeratology
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo wear Orthokeratology at night to slow down progressing myopia
defocus-incorporated multiple segment lenses (DIMS) spectacles
EXPERIMENTALTo wear defocus-incorporated multiple segment lenses (DIMS) spectacles at daytime
defocus incorporated soft contact (DISK) lenses
EXPERIMENTALTo wear defocus incorporated soft contact (DISK) lenses at daytime
single-vision spectacles (SVS)
PLACEBO COMPARATORTo wear SVS at daytime and at night before sleep
Interventions
Orthokeratology is to a rigid contact lens with reverse design to flat the central cornea to correct the myopia, which is to use at night during sleep; DIMS and SVS are both spectacles to wear at daytime; DIMS has many tiny lenses at peripheral of the big lenses to make the peripheral retina myopic defocus during the daytime; SVS has only one focus while DIMS has many focuses made by the tiny segments lenses around the peripheral vision fields; DISK is a soft contact lens with peripheral myopic power design to make the myopic eyes defocus at peripheral during the daytime.
It is the special lenses with peripheral lots of tiny segments of plus lenses around the center
Myopic Glasses with mono-focus in each eye
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must agree to participate in the study
- Must have cycloplegic refraction with spherical equivalent refractive (SER)
- \- 2.00 D \~ - 5.00 D (including the boundary values)
- Clinical diagnosis of astigmatism was ≤ 1.00D
- Must be able to have corrected visual acuity ≤ 0.00 logMAR of either eye
- Must be able to wear either of SVS/DIMS/DISC/Orthokeratology lenses and kept the same intervention for 12 month
- Must have the front cornea curve value between 41.00D\~44.00D
- Must have axial length of the study eye between 23.00mm and 25.00mm at baseline
You may not qualify if:
- Dry eye
- keratitis
- Conjunctivitis
- Clinical diagnosis of entropion
- Clinical diagnosis of glaucoma
- Clinical diagnosis of retinal lesions
- Clinical diagnosis of amblyopia
- Clinical diagnosis of optic media lesions (e.g., central thick corneal scars, cataract)
- Clinical diagnosis of optic nerve dysfunction
- Have medical history of atropine eyedrops (including 1% high concentration , 0.05%, 0.01% or other low concentration)
- Have history of wearing peripheral defocus spectacles
- Have history of wearing duo-focal soft contact lenses
- Unable to follow up
- Investigators consider to be not eligible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaikai QIUlead
- Ningbo Eye Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Ningbo Eye Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315000, China
Optometry department, Ningbo Eye Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2024
First Posted
October 23, 2024
Study Start
October 21, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 10, 2031
Last Updated
October 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The explanation why IPD will not be shared is that almost all the data to be obtained is on another clinic center with another external site. The data is confidential to obtain to outside system with complete details.