To Compare the Consumption of Sevoflurane and Desflurane in Low Flow Anaesthesia
1 other identifier
observational
564
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective observational study aims to compare sevoflurane and Desflurane consumption in low-flow anaesthesia using the ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiology). Environmental Sustainability Committee recommendations. The patients aged 20-65 years, ASA I and II undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study. Question: Can we reduce our carbon footprint of desflurane and sevoflurane using low-flow anaesthesia, according to the recommendations of the ASA Environment Sustainability Committee? PRIMARY To compare the mac hour consumption of sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthetic agents under low flow (one litre/min) conditions To calculate the carbon footprint of sevoflurane and desflurane in the study cases. SECONDARY To test whether a significant generation of carbon monoxide occurs due to the interaction of sevoflurane/desflurane with soda lime in the closed circuit Groups 1) low-flow sevoflurane (LFS)- 1 L/min gas flow 2) low- flow desflurane (LFD)- 1 L/min gas flow Anaesthesia will be administered according to the recommendations of the ASA Environment Sustainability Committee. Three strategies to reduce the fresh gas flow and environmental contamination are
- 1.Induction: Set the Vaporizer to Deliver a Concentration Greater than Intended
- 2.Intubation: Turn Off the Fresh Gas Flow, Not the Vaporizer.
- 3.Maintenance: Minimize Fresh Gas Flow During Maintenance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
3.6 years
September 19, 2021
September 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare the MAC hour consumption of sevoflurane under low flow conditions. To compare the mac hour consumption of sevoflurane and desflurane anasthetic agents under low flow (one litre/min) conditi
To compare the mac hour consumption of sevoflurane anasthetic agents under low flow (one litre/min) conditions To calculate the carbon foot print of sevoflurane and desflurane in the low flow anaesthesia being used in this study
Duration of surgery 4hours,4-6 hours, more than 6hours
To calculate the carbon foot print of sevoflurane and desflurane in low flow anaesthesia
Carbon foot print calculation according to the formula
Duration of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To test whether significant generation of carbon monoxide occurs due to interaction of sevoflurane / desflurane with sodalime in the closed circuit.
end of surgery
Study Arms (2)
low-flow sevoflurane (LFS)
Anaesthesia will be administered according to the recommendations of ASA Enviornment Sustainability Committee. Three strategies to reduce the fresh gas flow and enviornmental contamination are 1. Induction: Set the Vaporizer to Deliver a Concentration Greater than Intended 2. Intubation: Turn Off the Fresh Gas Flow, Not the Vaporizer. 3. Maintanance: Minimize Fresh Gas Flow During Maintenance.
low- flow desflurane (LFD)
Anaesthesia will be administered according to the recommendations of ASA Enviornment Sustainability Committee. Three strategies to reduce the fresh gas flow and enviornmental contamination are 1. Induction: Set the Vaporizer to Deliver a Concentration Greater than Intended 2. Intubation: Turn Off the Fresh Gas Flow, Not the Vaporizer. 3. Maintanance: Minimize Fresh Gas Flow During Maintenance.
Interventions
1. Induction: Set the Vaporizer to Deliver a Concentration Greater than Intended 2. Intubation: Turn Off the Fresh Gas Flow, Not the Vaporizer. 3. Maintanance: Minimize Fresh Gas Flow During Maintenance.
Eligibility Criteria
564 patients aged 20-65 and ASA status I-II scheduled for procedures longer than three hours duration at RGCI\&RC from 2017-2018 will be included in this study
You may qualify if:
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) I \& II.
- Patients with age 20-65 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to inhalation agents.
- Liver dysfunction.
- Chronic alcoholism.
- Chronic smokers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RGCI& RC
Delhi, 110085, India
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Anaesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2021
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
February 16, 2018
Primary Completion
September 16, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share