Parkinson Atypical Rating of Oculometric Patterns Evaluated Routinely
PARATROOPER
Use of Oculometric Measures in the Differential Diagnosis of Typical and Atypical Parkinsonian Conditions: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observational longitudinal study in 4 cohorts of patients with Parkinsonian syndromes, who are visiting the Movement Disorders outpatient clinics. The aim of the study is to assess the difference of oculometric measures in different neurodegenerative brain conditions and their accuracy over time, and as compared to clinical diagnosis, in order to find a change over time, difference between subgroups and correlations with accepted clinical endpoints in subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and who provide a signed Informed Consent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
September 1, 2024
1.1 years
September 11, 2024
March 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change of saccadic latency between subgroups
A difference between saccadic latency among the cohorts, enabling a categorization of different patients in study cohorts (p\<0.05)
12 months
Change of antisaccadic error rate between subgroups
A difference between antisaccadic error rate (%) among the cohorts, enabling a categorization of different patients in study cohorts (p\<0.05)
12 months
Change of saccadic latency over time as evaluated during visits
Difference between saccadic latency (ms) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p\>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Change of antisaccadic error rate over time as evaluated during visits
Difference between antisaccadic error rate (%) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p\>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency
The correlation between the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS, scored 0-to a maximum total of 199, indicating the worst possible disability from PD) and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05)
12 months
Correlation between UMSARS score and its parts with saccadic latency
The correlation between the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) scored 0-to a maximum total of 48, indicating the worst possible disability from MSA) and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05)
12 months
Correlation between PSP-CDS and its parts with saccadic latency
The correlation between the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Clinical Deficits Scale (PSP-CDS) scored 0-to a maximum total of 100, indicating the worst possible disability from MSA) and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Correlation between MoCA score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates
12 months
Correlation between MoCA score and its parts with smooth pursuit
12 months
Study Arms (4)
Parkinson patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, ages 50-80, Hoehn \& Yahr scale 1-3
PSP patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients diagnosed with PSP, according to actual diagnostic criteria from Höglinger GU et al, 2017.
MSA patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients diagnosed with MSA, according to actual diagnostic criteria from Wenning et al, 2022.
Healthy
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy subjects with no neurological diseases or cognition deficits
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women, age between 40 and 80 years
- \<5 years since disease diagnosis
- Normal or corrected vision
- MOCA score ≥ 20
- Ability to follow instructions
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent form Specific
- PD cohort: Ages 50-80, Hoehn \& Yahr scale 1-3
- PSP cohort: diagnosed according to actual diagnostic criteria from Höglinger GU et al, 2017.
- MSA cohort: diagnosed according to actual diagnostic criteria from Wenning et al, 2022.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NeuraLightlead
- Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocíocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)
Seville, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Habibi M, Oertel WH, White BJ, Brien DC, Coe BC, Riek HC, Perkins J, Yep R, Itti L, Timmermann L, Best C, Sittig E, Janzen A, Munoz DP. Eye tracking identifies biomarkers in alpha-synucleinopathies versus progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol. 2022 Sep;269(9):4920-4938. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11136-5. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
PMID: 35501501BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pablo Mir, MD
IBIS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Calle Antonio Maura Montaner, Seville, Spain
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
September 10, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-09