Evaluation of Correlation Between Oculometric Measures and Clinical Assessment in Parkinson's Disease
PALOMA
A Multicenter Longitudinal Study to Evaluate the Correlation Between Oculometric Measures and Clinical Assessment in Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PALOMA Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
300
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter longitudinal study in about 300 patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's disease, who will be evaluated in several clinical centers with a clinical assessment and an oculometric examination during a time period with specific intervals. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between oculometric measures and clinical assessment over time, as well as the potential to detect early change in clinical status using an oculometric assessment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable parkinson-disease
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2026
CompletedApril 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.5 years
May 8, 2023
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change of saccadic latency over time as evaluated during visits
Difference between saccadic latency (ms) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p\>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Change of anti-saccadic error rates over time as evaluated during visits
Difference between anti-saccadic error rates (%) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p\>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Change of smooth pursuit speed over time as evaluated during visits
Difference between smooth pursuit speed (ms)as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p\>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency
The correlation between the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS, scored 0-to a maximum total of 199, indicating the worst possible disability from PD) and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05) according to MDS-UPDRS scores at visits
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates
The correlation between Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS, scored 0-to a maximum total of 199, indicating the worst possible disability from PD) and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates (%), measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05) according to the MDS-UPDRS scores at visits
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with smooth pursuit
The correlation between Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS, scored 0-to a maximum total of 199, indicating the worst possible disability from PD) and its parts with smooth pursuit speed (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation\>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation\<0.2), p\<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Correlation between MoCA score and its parts with saccadic latency
12 months
Correlation between MoCA score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates
12 months
Correlation between MoCA score and its parts with smooth pursuit
12 months
Using the retrieved data of collected NeuraLight oculometric measures for calibration of prediction models of MDS-UPDRS clinical endpoint
12 months
Using the retrieved data of collected NeuraLight oculometric measures for calibration of prediction models of MoCA clinical endpoint
12 months
Study Arms (1)
PD patients
EXPERIMENTALMen and women with idiopathic PD (Hoehn \& Yahr scale 1-2) aged 40-85 years
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women with idiopathic PD (Hoehn \& Yahr scale 1-2)
- Age between 40 and 85 years old
- to 5 years' time since diagnosis
- Normal or corrected vision
- Ability to follow instructions
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent form
- No anticipated changes in PD medications from baseline throughout the study duration based on clinical status during screening
- If treated, stable on treatment for at least 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to sit for 40 minutes on a chair in a calm manner
- Personal or 1st degree relative history of epilepsy
- Additional neurological diseases
- Drug or alcohol abuse (except for using medical cannabis during 24 hours prior NL examination date)
- Pregnancy or a potential pregnancy (self-declaration)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NeuraLightlead
- European Clinical Research Infrastructure Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
AIBILI research center
Coimbra, Portugal
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)
Seville, Spain
University Hospital Zürich
Zurich, Switzerland
The VCTC
Oxford, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christina Januário, MD
University of Coimbra
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Armstrong, MD
The VCTC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pablo Mir, MD
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Tosin, PhD
Rush Medical University Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bettina Balint, MD
University Hospital, Zürich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2023
First Posted
May 17, 2023
Study Start
August 21, 2023
Primary Completion
March 2, 2026
Study Completion
March 2, 2026
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share