NCT06554249|UnknownDMC
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Study Start
October 15, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Primary Completion
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
The aim of this study is to determine whether full bladder IUD insertion without vulsellum or uterine sound under ultrasound guidance is associated with less pain compared with the standard technique of IUD insertion .
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
August 9, 2024
Actual (reported)August 15, 2024
Actual (reported)October 15, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Intensity of pain
Measured using 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain)
Immediately after the procedure
Success of IUD insertion
Immediately after the procedure
The patients are asked to empty the bladder before IUD insertion. The vulsellum is applied on the cervix, sounding of the uterus is done and the IUD is inserted according to the standard technique of IUD insertion. Pain intensity is assessed after the procedure using a visual analogue scale.
During the two hour period before IUD insertion, the patients are asked to drink about one liter of water and to avoid micturition. Abdominal ultrasound is used to obtain a sagittal view of the uterus and the IUD is introduced into the uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance. The vulsellum and uterine sound are not used during IUD insertion. Pain intensity is assessed after the procedure using a visual analogue scale.
The patients are asked to empty the bladder before IUD insertion. The vulsellum is applied on the cervix, sounding of the uterus is done and the IUD is inserted according to the standard technique of IUD insertion. Pain intensity is assessed after the procedure using a visual analogue scale.
During the two hour period before IUD insertion, the patients are asked to drink about one liter of water and to avoid micturition. Abdominal ultrasound is used to obtain a sagittal view of the uterus and the IUD is introduced into the uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance. The vulsellum and uterine sound are not used during IUD insertion. Pain intensity is assessed after the procedure using a visual analogue scale..
Faculty of medicine, Cairo university
Cairo, Egypt
Baradwan S, Alshahrani MS, Alnoury A, Khadawardi K, Khan MA, Abdelkader RAA, Saleh OI, Galal HM, Mohamed SMA, Abdelhakim AM, Elgedawy AM, Elbahie AM, Gaber MA, Magdy AA, Shaheen K. Does Ultrasound Guidance Provide Pain Relief During Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Jul;42(7):1401-1411. doi: 10.1002/jum.16166. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
Usama M Fouda, Prof.
Cairo University
First Submitted
August 9, 2024
First Posted
August 15, 2024
Study Start
October 15, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Primary Completion
June 15, 2025
Ultrasound Assisted Wound Debridement (UAW) Versus Standard Wound Treatment in Complicated Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
June 15, 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
August 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: