Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of a Slipped Disc of the Lower Back
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic low back pain is a common problem which results in reduced functionality, quality of life and general well being. Conservative treatment includes patient education, exercise, maintaining a healthy body mass index and appropriate modifications to activities of daily living. Physical modalities are used to support the mainstay of treatment and include superficial heat, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), ultrasound, short wave diathermy , traction, and complimentary therapies. In the clinical practice of the investigators, diathermy, in the form of ultrasound and short wave, is used to heat deeper tissues, increase tissue elasticity and metabolic rate and reduce pain and muscle spasm. The medical literature to date states that further studies are required to compare the efficacy of different diathermy modalities in the treatment of lower back pain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound to that of short wave diathermy and a treatment program which does not include diathermy in the treatment of a slipped disc.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedNovember 21, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.3 years
February 4, 2019
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in level of pain
visual analogue scale (VAS) score from 0 to 10cm for current pain. 0= no pain 10= the worst pain imaginable
Before treatment, 2 weeks after the commencement of treatment, 6 weeks after the commencement of treatment, 14 weeks after the commencement of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in level of Disability
Before treatment, 2 weeks after the commencement of treatment, 6 weeks after the commencement of treatment, 14 weeks after the commencement of treatment
Change in health related quality of life
Before treatment, 6 weeks after the commencement of treatment, 14 weeks after the commencement of treatment
Study Arms (3)
Ultrasound group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThirty one patients receiving a total of ten sessions of physical therapy over a two week period. Each week the patients will receive five session of physical therapy on consecutive days. The ultrasound group will be treated with a hotpack (20minutes) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at a frequency of 100Hz intensity adjusted to the patient's tolerability (twenty minutes) and ultrasound 1MHz frequency (ten minutes) applied to the lower back, abdominal and lower back muscle strengthening exercises.
Short wave diathermy group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe short wave diathermy group will consist of thirty one patients receiving a total of ten sessions of physical therapy over a two week period. Each week the patients will receive five session of physical therapy on consecutive days. The short wave diathermy group will be treated with a hotpack (20minutes), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at a frequency of 100Hz intensity adjusted to the patient's tolerability (twenty minutes) and short wave diathermy at a frequency of 27.12MHz (twenty minutes) applied to the lower back , abdominal and lower back muscle strengthening exercises.
Control group
OTHERThe control group will consist of thirty one patients receiving a total of ten sessions of physical therapy over a two week period. Each week the patients will receive five session of physical therapy on consecutive days. The control group will be treated with a hotpack (20minutes) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at a frequency of 100Hz intensity adjusted to the patient's tolerability (twenty minutes) applied to the lower back , abdominal and lower back muscle strengthening exercises.
Interventions
Ultrasound 1 MHz, 1.5 W/cm2 for a total of 10 min applied to the lower back
SWD frequency of 27.12MHz applied in continuous mode (thermic) applied to the lower back for twenty minutes
superficial heat, analgesic physical modality and exercise only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- )Age 20-60
- )Presenting to the Baskent University Faculty of Medicine Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department outpatient clinic
- \) history of low back pain for greater than three months
- \) Aetiology of back pain lumbar disc herniation based on history, examination and computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (protruded, extruded disc)
You may not qualify if:
- )lower extremity neurological deficit, 2) infectious, inflammatory, metabolic, neoplastic, abdominal, pelvic aetiology of back pain. 3) a history of vertebral fracture, spinal surgery, spondylolisthesis 4) heat intolerance/medical contraindication to thermal treatment 5) presence of metal prosthesis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Hospital
Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, van Tulder MW. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015 Feb 18;350:h444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h444.
PMID: 25694111BACKGROUNDOral A, Ketenci A. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Approaches in the Management of Radicular Low Back Pain. A review of the Evidence and Current Recommendations. Turkish Journal of Physlcai and Rehabilitation Medicine 59:57-68, 2013
BACKGROUNDChou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians; American College of Physicians; American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.
PMID: 17909209BACKGROUNDJegede KA, Ndu A, Grauer JN. Contemporary management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.003.
PMID: 20399360BACKGROUNDFiore P, Panza F, Cassatella G, Russo A, Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, Ranieri M, Di Teo L, Santamato A. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;47(3):367-73. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PMID: 21654616BACKGROUNDChou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
PMID: 17909210BACKGROUNDAhmed MS, Shakoor MA, Khan AA. Evaluation of the effects of shortwave diathermy in patients with chronic low back pain. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2009 Apr;35(1):18-20. doi: 10.3329/bmrcb.v35i1.2320.
PMID: 19637541BACKGROUNDOzen S, Guzel S, Senlikci HB, Cosar SNS, Selcuk ES. Efficacy of ultrasound versus short wave diathermy in the treatment of chronic low back pain in patients with lumbar disk herniation: a prospective randomized control study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 20;15(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00769-2.
PMID: 37986090DERIVEDEbadi S, Henschke N, Forogh B, Nakhostin Ansari N, van Tulder MW, Babaei-Ghazani A, Fallah E. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD009169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009169.pub3.
PMID: 32623724DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sacide N Saracgil Cosar, MD
Baskent University Faculty of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator assessing the patient before and post treatment will be blind to the treatment received by the patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
September 14, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
November 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share