Comparative Effects of Hang Clean and Half Squat Training Program Among Basketball Players

NCT06536790 | Recruiting DMC

• 1 other identifier: REC/RCR & AHS/23/0474
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 40
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of hang clean and half squat training programs on vertical jump performance and strength in male basketball players aged 18-35 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does a hang clean training program improve vertical jump performance in basketball players? Does a half squat training program improve vertical jump performance in basketball players? Researchers will compare the hang clean training group to the half squat training group to see if there is a significant difference in the improvement of vertical jump performance and strength. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled and allocated in group A \& B through sealed envelop method by Non-probability Convenient random sampling technique. Subjects in Group A will receive hang clean training. Group B will receive half squat training, attend pre- and post-testing assessments of vertical jump performance and strength

Conditions

Weight-Bearing Strengthening Program; Muscle Strength; Basketball

Keywords

Weight lifting; Resistance training; Basketball players

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• vertical jump test

  The vertical jump and reach test through wall will be used to assess the maximum vertical jump height of each participant. The test will be performed by having participants stand side on to a wall with their feet shoulder-width apart. They will reach up with one hand and mark the highest point they can reach with their fingers on the wall. Then, they will perform a maximum vertical jump, landing on both feet, and mark the highest point they can reach at the peak of their jump on the wall. The difference between the two marks will be recorded as the vertical jump height in centimeters (cm). This metric will be used to quantify the improvement in vertical jump performance following the 12-week hang clean training program versus the 12-week half squat training program.

  0 week, 12week

• 1-repitition maximum for strength

  The 1RM strength metric will be used to quantify the maximum weight an individual can lift in a single repetition of a specific exercise, in this case, the hang clean and half squat exercises. This metric will be used to assess the improvement in maximum strength following the 12-week hang clean training program versus the 12-week half squat training program.

  0 week, 12week

Study Arms (2)

Hang clean training

EXPERIMENTAL

Group A will perform hang clean training. Three sessions per week for twelve weeks.

Other: hang clean training

Half squat training

EXPERIMENTAL

Group B will perform half squat training. Three sessions per week for twelve weeks.

Other: half squat training

Interventions

hang clean training OTHER

This include hang clean training thrice a week for twelve weeks

Hang clean training

half squat training OTHER

This include half squat training thrice a week for twelve weeks

Half squat training

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 35 Years
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Male Basketball player
• Having experience with Weight-lifting movements, Squats, and Deadlifts
• No history of anterior cruciate ligament injuries
• No present complaint of Injury.
• years of Professional experience
• Current competitive level

You may not qualify if:

• Medical condition
• Previous history of LBP
• Orthopedic or health related conditions
• Female
• Inadequate Training Experience
• Exclude Performance-Enhancing Substance

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Riphah International University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Don Bosco Basketball Court

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

• Ciacci S, Bartolomei S. The effects of two different explosive strength training programs on vertical jump performance in basketball. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Oct;58(10):1375-1382. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07316-9. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

  PMID: 28597614 BACKGROUND

• Perez-Castilla A, Garcia-Ramos A, Padial P, Morales-Artacho AJ, Feriche B. Load-Velocity Relationship in Variations of the Half-Squat Exercise: Influence of Execution Technique. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):1024-1031. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002072.

  PMID: 28885389 BACKGROUND

• Hayashi R, Yoshida T, Kariyama Y. Differences in Kinetics during One- and Two-Leg Hang Power Clean. Sports (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;9(4):45. doi: 10.3390/sports9040045.

  PMID: 33801591 BACKGROUND

• Petway AJ, Freitas TT, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Medina Leal D, Alcaraz PE. Training load and match-play demands in basketball based on competition level: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0229212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229212. eCollection 2020.

  PMID: 32134965 BACKGROUND

• Philipp NM, Cabarkapa D, Nijem RM, Blackburn SD, Fry AC. Vertical Jump Neuromuscular Performance Characteristics Determining On-Court Contribution in Male and Female NCAA Division 1 Basketball Players. Sports (Basel). 2023 Dec 4;11(12):239. doi: 10.3390/sports11120239.

  PMID: 38133106 BACKGROUND

• Cabarkapa D, Eserhaut DA, Fry AC, Cabarkapa DV, Philipp NM, Whiting SM, Downey GG. Relationship between Upper and Lower Body Strength and Basketball Shooting Performance. Sports (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;10(10):139. doi: 10.3390/sports10100139.

  PMID: 36287752 BACKGROUND

• Stojanovic E, Stojiljkovic N, Scanlan AT, Dalbo VJ, Berkelmans DM, Milanovic Z. The Activity Demands and Physiological Responses Encountered During Basketball Match-Play: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):111-135. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0794-z.

  PMID: 29039018 BACKGROUND

• Ferioli D, Bosio A, Bilsborough JC, La Torre A, Tornaghi M, Rampinini E. The Preparation Period in Basketball: Training Load and Neuromuscular Adaptations. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Sep 1;13(8):991-999. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0434. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

  PMID: 29345555 BACKGROUND

• Barrera-Dominguez FJ, Almagro BJ, Saez de Villarreal E, Molina-Lopez J. Effect of individualised strength and plyometric training on the physical performance of basketball players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Dec;23(12):2379-2388. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2238690. Epub 2023 Jul 30.

  PMID: 37470434 BACKGROUND

• Takeuchi K, Tsukuda F. Comparison of the effects of static stretching on range of motion and jump height between quadriceps, hamstrings and triceps surae in collegiate basketball players. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Dec 22;5(1):e000631. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000631. eCollection 2019.

  PMID: 31908836 BACKGROUND

• Brini S, Boullosa D, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Ramirez-Campillo R, Nobari H, Castagna C, Clemente FM, Ardigo LP. Neuromuscular and balance adaptations following basketball-specific training programs based on combined drop jump and multidirectional repeated sprint versus multidirectional plyometric training. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0283026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283026. eCollection 2023.

  PMID: 36921008 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Muhammad Hamza Afzal, DPT

  Riphah International University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Muhammad Atif Javed, PP-DPT

CONTACT

+923317491071; atif.javed@riphah.edu.pk

Syed Asadullah Arslan, PHD

CONTACT

+923321483575

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: the assessor who will take the readings is blind
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: Randomized clinical trial

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 31, 2024
• First Posted: August 5, 2024
• Study Start: June 26, 2024
• Primary Completion: September 14, 2024
• Study Completion: September 14, 2024
• Last Updated: August 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)